Loading...
Ord 306 Rezoning a tract of land from Office Park to Planned Development PD-2 ORDINANCE 306 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TEXAS TO REZONE AN APPROXIMATELY 311-ACRE TRACT OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED IN ENTON AND TARRANT COUNTIES, TEXAS (i) SOUTH OF S.H. 114, (ii) EST OF PRECINCT LE ROAD, AN (iii) NORTH OF DOVE ROAD FROM "0" OFFICE PARK AN "R-40" ESTATE RESIDENTIAL TO A "P 9' PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR AUTHORIZING AN OFFICE COMPLEX, INCLUDING OFFICE, PERSONAL SERVICES, BANK AN FINANCIAL STITUTIONS, DATA CENTER, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND ACCESSORY USES SUCH AS HOTEL/MOTEL WITH CONFERENCE FAC I , RETAIL AND PARKING STRUCTURES; DEFINING CERTAIN TERMS; DESCRIBING AND INTERPRETING THE PD CONCEPT PLAN; REGULATING PERMITTED USES, HEIGHT, LOT SIZES AND BUILDING LINES, TOTAL FLOOR AREA, PARKING, LOADING AN OTHER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, LANDSCAPING, FLOOD PLAIN, AN DRAINAGE; RATIFYING THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE BOARD ON JULY 27, 1998; PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OFT E OFFICIAL ZONING P; PROVING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE ATE. WfffiREAS, on November 13, 1992, the Board of Aldermen (sometimes referred to as the "Board") of the Town of Westlake, Texas (the "Town"), adopted a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance(the"Zoning Ordinance");and WIMREAS, on August 24, 1992, the Board adopted a Comprehensive Plan (the "1992 Comprehensive Pian") for the"Town; and WI-IEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance has been amended by the Board after receiving recommendations from the Planning and Zoning Commission (the "Commission"); and WHEREAS, on September 15, 1997, based on the recommendations of the Commission, the Board amended the Zoning Ordinance and the subdivision regulations by the adopting of a Unified Development Code(the"UDC") for the Town; and WFffiREAS,the UDC has been amended with the most recent amendments being adopted on February 16, 1995; and WfffiREAS, there is located within the corporate limits of the Town an approximately 311-acre tract of land (commonly known as the Maverick Planning Area and hereinafter sometimes referred to as the"Planning Area"); and WfffiREAS, the public infrastructure, amenities, and services necessary to develop the Town, including the Planning Area, are not available and will not be ORDINANCE NO. 3 PAGE 2 (Fidelity PD) available without a long-term commitment of both public and private funds to finance infrastructure, amenities, and services; and WHEREAS, because of the size, location, and natural features of the Planning Area and the Town's need for public infrastructure, amenities, and services, the Town has a critical interest in the development of the Planning Area and is encouraging such development to the highest possible standards of quality consistent with the Town's long- term development vision; and WHEREAS, because of improvements to State Highway 114, further urban growth throughout the region, and other changed conditions that affect the region, the Town believes there are unique and significant opportunities for an master planned office complex with accessory uses within the Planning Area that will be consistent with the Town's long-term development vision; and WHEREAS, the location and unique features of the Planning Area present unique opportunities for facilities suited to large corporate headquarters within the master planned development; and WHEREAS,the suitability of the Planning Area for such master planned facilities can be enhanced through modifications to the development regulations governing the Planning Area, including modifications to the zoning, floodplain, subdivision and other standards otherwise applicable under the UDC; and WHEREAS, the economic development and land use planning objectives of the Town will be furthered by the establishment of such master planned facilities; and WHEREAS, on July 27, 1998, after receiving recommendations from the Commission, the Board approved and adopted amendments to the Thoroughfare Plan, and an amended Conceptual Open Space Plan to the 1992 Comprehensive Plan; all of which amended plans are approved and adopted by the Board to enable the Town to maximize the opportunities and benefits to the Town and all of its citizens that will result from a master-planned, office development of the Planning Area; and WHEREAS, the Commission and Board held a public hearing upon the application of Maverick Commercial Investments, Inc. to rezone the approximately 311- acre tract of land to PD Planned Development District on July 27, 1998, after written notice of such hearing having been sent to owners of real property being within 200 feet of the property and notice being published in a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Westlake, all in accordance with law; and WHEREAS, the applicant has proposed that the subject property be used solely for a corporate office campus, including office complex, bank and financial institutions,, ORDINANCE NO. PAGE 3 (Fidelity PD) data center and research and development facilities, together with certain private commercial uses wholly accessory to such corporate office complex; and W-BEREAS, the Commission has recommended to the Board that the hereinafter described property be rezoned to '?D" Planned Development District authorizing a corporate office complex, including office complex, bank and financial institutions, data center and research and development facilities, together with certain private commercial uses wholly accessory to such corporate office complex; and IB AS, the Board believes that the interests of the Town, the present and future residents and citizens of the Town, and developers of land within the Town are best served by adopting this Ordinance, which the Board has determined to be consistent with the 1992 Comprehensive Plan, the Thoroughfare Plan, and Open Space Plan, all as amended; WHEREAS,the Board adopted Ordinance No. 301 on July 27, 1998 rezoning the hereinafter described property to "PD" Planned Development District with certain conditions and the Board desires to ratify its action taken on July 27, 1998 by adopting this ordinance which incorporates the conditions attached to the "PD" Planned Development District; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TEXAS: PART 1. That the recitals set forth above are hereby incorporated herein, adopted by the Town and declared to be true and correct. PART 11. That the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Westlake, Texas, Ordinance No. 200, is hereby amended by this PD Ordinance, by adding Planned Development District No. 2 within the property described in Exhibit "X', attached hereto by reference for all purposes. This PD will be subject to the zoning provisions, development standards and other regulations contained in the Planned Development District No. 2 Standards attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and the Planned Development District No. 2 Concept Plan attached hereto as Exhibit "C". ORDE'4ANCE NO. PAGE 4 (Fidelity PD) PART 111. Except to the extent provided by the PD Concept Plan and this PD Ordinance, development of land within the PD District shall be governed by the provisions of the UDC applicable to "0" Office zoning districts and by all other ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town that are applicable to development as amended and in effect at the time of the passage of this Ordinance. In the event of any conflict between (i)the PD Concept Plan and this PD Ordinance and (ii) the UDC and such ordinances, rules and regulations,the terms, provisions and intent of the PD Concept Plan and this PD Ordinance shall control. PART IV. Upon the effective date of this PD, the Town Secretary shall promptly enter the new Planned Development on the Town's Official Zoning Map,which entry shall include the abbreviated designation'TD No. 2" and the date that this Ordinance was adopted by the Board. PART V. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the Board of Aldermen of the Town of Westlake, Texas, that sections, paragraphs, clauses and phrases of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs or sections of this Ordinance since the same would have been enacted by the Board of Aldermen of the Town of Westlake without the incorporation in this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase,clause, sentence, paragraph or section. PART VI. This Ordinance shall become effective upon its passage and proof of the unconditional conveyance of the property described in Exhibit "N' to Fidelity Texas Limited Partnership or an affiliated or related entity. ORDINANCE NO. � PAGE 5 (Fidelity PD) PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TEXAS, ON TIES 1 OTH DAY OF AUGUST, 1998. CHARLA BRADSHAW, MAYOR PR® TEM ATTEST. ` t Ingersswy, Town Secr PROVED AS TO FORM: Paul C. Isham, Town Attorney LEGAL DESCRIPTION 309.305 ACRE TRACT BEING A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CHARLES MEDLIN SURVEY,ABSTRACT NUMBER 823(DENTON COUNTY),ABSTRACT NUMBER 1084(TARRANT COUNTY),THE MEMUCAN HUNT SURVEY,ABSTRACT NUMBER 756(TARRANT COUNTY)AND THE J.BACON SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 2026 (TARRANT COUNTY),TOWN OF WESTLAKE, DENTON AND TARRANT COUNTIES, TEXAS AND BEING ALL OF THE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO HILLWOOD/1088, LTD., RECORDED IN VOLUME 12260, PAGE 1948 OF DEED RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS,ALL OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO SCOTT BRADLEY AND WIFE KELLY PACE BRADLEY, RECORDED IN VOLUME 6395, PAGE 67 OF DEED RECORDS AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO HILLWOOD/WILLOW BEND, LTD., RECORDED IN VOLUME 11316, PAGE 2235 OF DEED RECORDS,TARRANT COUNTY,TEXAS AND UNDER COUNTY CLERK'S NUMBER 93-R0075228 OF REAL PROPERTY RECORDS, DENTON COUNTY,TEXAS AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A RAILROAD SPIKE, FOUND AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF PRECINCT LINE ROAD (A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY)AND THE CENTERLINE OF ROANOKE-DOVE ROAD (A CALLED 50 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY); THENCE WITH THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF ROANOKE-DOVE ROAD THE FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES S 89°50'03"W, 1942.81 FEET; N 86°34'52"W, 550.83 FEET; N 82028'16"W, 252.07 FEET; S 65°50'11"W, 562.77 FEET; S 71°04'02"W, 198.77 FEET; THENCE N 11°01'26"W, 589.37 FEET, DEPARTING SAID APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE; THENCE N 00`2655"W, 573.79 FEET; THENCE N 17'09'12"E, 1518.12 FEET; THENCE N 09007'25"W, 892.93 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT; THENCE WITH SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 1369.14 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 58°52'17", HAVING A RADIUS OF 1332.50 FEET, THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 49012'42"E, 1309.71 FEET; THENCE N 1946'33"E, 318.45 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF STATE HIGHWAY 114 (A VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY); CSB Job No. 981498010 S#CRT July 9, 1998 J:\JOB\98149801\SUR\WP\LEG\OVERALL.WPD Page 1 of 2 s THENCE WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND DISTANCES N 70'39'43"E, 64.29 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT; WITH SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC DISTANCE OF 443.43 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°25'08", HAVING A RADIUS OF 5749.58 FEET,THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 72008'30"E, 443.32 FEET; S 63'32'03"E,238.74 FEET; N 84°41'23"E, 154.28 FEET; S 76041'49"E, 119.54 FEET; S 45°55'45"E, 116.36 FEET; S 75°22'11"E,296.05 FEET; N 69029'26"E,98.90 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT; WITH SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT,AN ARC DISTANCE OF 204.65 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02003'13", HAVING A RADIUS OF 5709.58 FEET, THE LONG CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 72°10'21"E, 204.64 FEET; S 71'03'31"E,736.07 FEET,TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID HILLWOODMILLOW BEND TRACT, IN THE APPROXIMATE CENTERLINE OF AFOREMENTIONED PRECINCT LINE ROAD; THENCE S 00°30'00"E, 1386.00 FEET; THENCE S 23°5544"W, 87.29 FEET; THENCE N 89°19'34"W, 164.44 FEET; THENCE S 06°48'13"W, 137.96 FEET; THENCE S 89043'41"E, 50.00 FEET; THENCE S 00°16'19"W, 2147.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 13,473,328 SQUARE FEET OR 309.305 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY C&B Job No. 981498010 S#CRT July 9, 1998 J:\JOB\98149801\SUR\WP\LEG\OVERALL.WPD Page 2 of 2 MAVERICK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND CONCEPT PLAN Exhibits B and C to ORDINANCE NO. 306 establishing TOWN OF WESTLAKE, TEXAS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 2 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MAVERICK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1 SHORT TITLE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SECTION 2 PURPOSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SECTION 4 GENERAL DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section 4.1 Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Section 4.2 Words and Terms Defined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SECTION 5 APPLICABILITY OF EXISTING REGULATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 SECTION 6 AMENDMENT OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 SECTION 7 CONCEPT PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Section 7.1 PD Concept Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Section 7.2 PD Development Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Section 7.3 PD Site Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Section 7.4 Relationship of Plans to Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Plan and Open Space Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 SECTION 8 COMPLIANCE WITH CODE REQUIRED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 ARTICLE II. PERMITTED USES SECTION 1 USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 SECTION 2 ACCESSORY USES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 SECTION 3 USES PERMITTED BY SPECIFIC USE PERMITS (SUP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Table of Contents Page i ARTICLE III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 1 DENSITY AND SITE COVERAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Section 1.1 Floor Area Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Section 1.2 Lot Coverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Figure 1 Improvements to be in Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 SECTION 2 MINIMUM LOT SIZE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 SECTION 3 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 SECTION 4 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Section 4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Section 4.2 Exceptions to Height Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 SECTION 5 MINIMUM PRIMARY BUILDING SIZE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 SECTION 6 SETBACKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Section 6.1 Front Yard Setbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Section 6.2 Rear Yard Setbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Section 6.3 Side Yard Setbacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 SECTION 7 FENCING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 SECTION 8 EXTERIOR WALLS AND BUILDING ARTICULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Section 8.1 Buildings of 100 square feet or more and over nine feet in height . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Section 8.2 Exterior Materials for Accessory Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Section 8.3 Building Articulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Section 8.4 Exceptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 SECTION 9 LIGHTING STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Section 9.1 Lighting Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Section 9.2 Lighting Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 SECTION 10 RESIDENTIAL PROXIMITY SLOPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Section 10.1 Determination of Proximity Slope Height Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table of Contents Page ii Section 10.2 Exceptions to Slope Requirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Section 10.3 Typical Illustration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 ARTICLE IV. ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS SECTION 1 STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Section 1.1 Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Section 1.2 Bridging of Floodplain and Waterway . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 ARTICLE V. PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS SECTION 1 PARKING SPACE STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 SECTION 2 OFFICE USE PARKING REQUIREMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 SECTION 3 HANDICAPPED PARKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 SECTION 4 OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 SECTION 5 LIGHTING OF PARKING AND LOADING AREAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 ARTICLE VI. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Section 1.1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Section 1.2 Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 SECTION 2 PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Section 2.1 Prior to Issuing a Building Permit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Section 2.2 Variations Approved on PD Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 SECTION 3 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Section 3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Section 3.2 Town Edge Landscape Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Section 3.3 Roadway Landscape Zones . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Section 3.4 Roadway Median Landscape Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Section 3.5 Parking Lot Landscaping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Section 3.6 Structured Parking Landscaping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Section 3.7 Screening of Surface Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Section 3.8 General Site Tree Planting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Section 3.9 Screening of Loading and Service Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Section 3.10 Acceptable Landscape Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Table of Contents Page iii SECTION 4 IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Section 4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Section 4.2 Irrigation Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 SECTION 5 LANDSCAPE COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Section 5.1 Landscaping required prior to Certificate of Occupancy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Section 5.2 Performance Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 SECTION 6 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Section 6.1 Owner Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Section 6.2 Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 SECTION 7 ILLUSTRATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 ARTICLE VII. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 1 VARIANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SECTION 2 CONSEQUENCES OF BOARD DENIALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SECTION 3 BOARD AND COMMISSION APPROVALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SECTION 4 STREET AND HEAD-IN PARKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SECTION 5 SURVEY MONUMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SECTION 6 MAINTENANCE PERIOD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SECTION 7 FORM OF SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 SECTION 8 TIMING OF SECURITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 SECTION 9 BOUNDARY SURVEY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 SECTION 10 FOUNDATION AND FRAMING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 SECTION 11 FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 SECTION 12 OVERSIZE COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 SECTION 13 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT SITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 SECTION 14 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS - LEVEL OF SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 SECTION 15 UTILITY EASEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 16 ADA STANDARDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 17 BRIDGE SURFACES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 18 FIRE LANES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 19 DEAD-END WATER LINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 20 WATER LINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 21 DEPTH OF COVER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 22 FIRE HYDRANT SPACING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 23 FLOODPLAIN AND DRAINAGE RELOCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 SECTION 24 MANHOLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Table of Contents Page iv MW \: % ?\ \\ » ^ § n ONW \\ \« ` ' \\ ,,, . .,,,,, . ..,,,. . ...+m» � TO `??¥ � »�#?//\:?� » ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the Maverick Planned Development District, or simply as the Planned Development, or, as referenced in this document, as the "PD". SECTION 2 PURPOSES This Planned Development is adopted for the following purposes: • To provide for a superior design of lots or buildings; • To provide for increased open space opportunities; • To provide rural amenities or features that would be of special benefit to the property users or community; • To protect or preserve natural amenities and environmental assets such as trees, creeks, ponds, floodplains, slopes or hills and viewscapes; • To provide an appropriate balance between the intensity of development and the ability to provide adequate supporting public facilities and services. SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE This PD takes effect as set forth in the adopting ordinance. SECTION 4 GENERAL DEFINITIONS Section 4.1 Uses • For the purpose of this PD Ordinance, certain numbers, abbreviations, terms, and words shall be used, interpreted and defined as set forth in this Section. • Unless the context clearly indicates to the contrary, words used in the present tense include the future tense and words used in the plural include the singular. • The word "shall" wherever used in this Section will be interpreted in its mandatory sense; the word "may" shall be deemed as permissive. Section 4.2 Words and Terms Defined Accessory use: Means uses provided for the support of primary permitted uses or to be used principally by tenants or employees of a primary use. Coverage: Means the percentage of lot area covered by roof, floor, parking structure or other structure, or surface parking. Coverage shall not include the area covered by roof eaves (and other ordinary building projections up to 24 inches) roadways, driveways, sidewalks or Article 1. General Provisions Page 1 impervious cover other than listed herein. Floor Area Ratio (FARC Means the ratio of floor area to lot area. Floor area means the total area of all floors of all buildings on a lot or unified development site measured between the outer perimeter walls of the buildings excluding (i) area in a building or in a separate structure(whether below or above-grade) used for the parking of motor vehicles, (ii) courts or balconies open to the sky, and (iii) roof area used for recreation. Lot area means the gross site area excluding only (i) public roadways; and (ii) the Town edge landscape zone. Lot Lines: Mean the property lines bounding a lot, excluding any street or alley dedicated. Masonry: Means exterior building material which includes natural stone, brick and architectural precast concrete described as "Cast Stone" with structural component properties. Use of precast concrete requires that traditional profiles,joints and reveals shall be used in the creation of elements to integrate the precast with other exterior building materials. SECTION 5 APPLICABILITY OF EXISTING REGULATIONS Except to the extent provided by the PD Concept and Development Plan and this PD Ordinance, development of land within the PD District shall be governed by the provisions of the UDC applicable to "Office-O" zoning districts and by all other ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town that are applicable to development. In the event of any conflict between (i) the PD Concept Plan and this PD Ordinance and (ii) the UDC and such ordinances, rules and regulations, the terms, provisions and intent of the PD Concept Plan and this PD Ordinance shall control. For a period of five years from the date of the passage of this Ordinance, the PD shall be exempt from any amendments to the UDC adopted subsequent to August 3, 1998. SECTION 6 AMENDMENT OF OFFICIAL ZONING MAP Upon the adoption of this PD, the Town Secretary shall promptly enter the new Planned Development on the Town's Official Zoning Map, which entry shall include the abbreviated designation "PD No. 2" and the date this PD was adopted by the Board. SECTION 7 CONCEPT PLAN, DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SITE PLANS Section 7.1 PD Concept Plan This PD District is established based on the PD Concept Plan attached to and made a part of this PD Ordinance. The graphic depictions contained on the PD Concept Plan are regulatory standards and the size of the plans may vary from the standard size cited herein if accepted by the Town Planner. Amendments to the PD Concept Plan shall be considered a zoning change and the provisions of Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code Article I. General Provisions Page 2 relating to notices,public hearings and written protests for changes in zoning districts shall apply. Section 7.2 PD Development Plans Development Plans shall not be required for any development within the PD District. Section 7.3 PD Site Plans A. General Requirement. This PD District was established based on a PD Concept Plan; consequently, development within the PD District shall require one or more PD Site Plans approved by the Commission in accordance with this PD. A PD Site Plan may be prepared and submitted for the entire development at one time or for individual phases of development, and each plan shall be submitted in fifteen(15) copies to the Town Secretary. Each PD Site Plan shall be accompanied by a drainage study for the area covered by the proposed plan. The first Site Plan shall be accompanied by a drainage plan for the entire site. B. Submittal Requirements. The following requirements apply to each application for PD Site Plan approval: 1. Size. PD Site Plans shall be prepared on one or more standard sheets of sizes of 30" x 42" or 24" x 36" and at an engineering scale of 1"=100' or larger. If multiple sheets are required, an overall plan shall be submitted as well (which may be to any scale). PD Site Plans shall be prepared by a registered engineer, architect, or landscape architect. 2. General Information: a. North Arrow; b. Total site acreage; C. Submission date; d. Scale (written and graphic); Article I. General Provisions Page 3 e. Vicinity map; E Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the architect, landscape architect,planner, surveyor,designer,engineer,developer,and owner (as applicable); g. A boundary survey of the site with the location of proposed land uses; h. Adjacent subdivision names and property lines; and i. Adjacent land uses and structures. 3. Structures: a. Location, site dimensions, building square footage and use of all existing facilities and proposed building sites the first site plan may show general boundaries of building site locations; and footprints for actual structures may be smaller than the building site envelope shown each plan may be subsequently approved showing specific footprints,by the Town Planner, without amending the PD Site Plan provided that the general building site boundary is not exceeded); b. Setback and separation distances between building sites; C. Preliminary elevations and perspectives to show the relationship of building heights to surrounding topography; d. Proposed construction type and facade materials for all nonresidential buildings (the Commission may require elevations and perspective drawings); e. Proposed density of each use; and f. Proposed location of screening along the public roadways shown on the PD Concept Plan. 4. Streets and Sidewalks: a. A general plan for circulation of traffic and pedestrians within and external to the development, including designated points of access; Article I. General Provisions Page 4 b. Location and width of all rights-of-way and easements; C. Location and approximate dimensions of all pavement and curbing; d. Location and width of all sidewalks; e. Location and width of all ingress/egress points; E Location and width of all medians and median breaks; and g. Location of any special traffic regulation facilities. 5. Off-Street Parking and Loading Areas: a. Number, location, and dimension of spaces; b. Type of surface material of parking facility; C. Dimension of aisles, driveways, maneuvering areas, and curb return radii; d. Distance between spaces and adjacent rights-of-way; and e. Location of all existing and proposed fire lanes and hydrants. 6. Landscaping: a. Location and size of major tree groupings and existing hardwood trees greater than 8" caliper, noting whether they are to be removed or retained; b. Location size and species of proposed plant materials, including paving; C. Number and type of each landscape element; d. Height and type of all fencing or buffering; C. Height of all planters, sculptures, and decorative screens; Article I. General Provisions Page 5 f. Location and type of trash receptacle screening; g. Location and type of lighting for streets, signage, and parking areas; and h. Location of visibility triangles where required. 7. Drainage: a. Direction of water flow; b. Quantity of on and off-site water generation; C. Topographic contours at a minimum of 5 foot intervals; d. Points of concentrated water discharge; e. Areas where special design and construction may be necessary due to slope or soil conditions; f. Location and design of all water detention and drainage areas; and g. Drainage ways, creeks, and limits of the 100 year floodplain and floodway as shown on current FEMA mapping or the Town's drainage plan, including location and acreage,together with a general plan for accommodating flood waters and drainage. 8. Preliminary Service Plan: a. A preliminary drainage plan of the area showing the size and location of each existing and proposed drainage way and retention or detention area; b. The proposed method of providing water and sewer service. Article I. General Provisions Page 6 9. Development Standards Variance(s): A list of the development standards, if any (whether in the PD Ordinance or in the then-existing ordinances, rules, or regulations of the Town that apply to development within the PD District), for which the applicant is seeking a variance by the Board as part of the PD Site Plan approval process (without the necessity of going through a board of adjustment or other variance procedure). 10. Height Variances: If Board approval of any height variance above that designated on the Concept Plan and at Article III, Section 10 is being requested, the applicant shall prepare (at the request of the Town Planner) a view analysis of the impact of such requested variance on adjacent residential areas of the Town. C. Commission Decision. The Commission, after notice and public hearing in accordance with the Town's UDC procedures, shall approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny each PD Site Plan. D. Approval Criteria. The Commission, in approving, conditionally approving, or denying a PD Site Plan, shall consider the following criteria: 1. The plan complies with the applicable PD Concept Plan and PD Ordinance, including express conditions attached to the PD Concept Plan or PD Ordinance; 2. The plan complies with the standards and conditions of the Town's Unified Development Code and of other ordinances,rules and regulations of the Town(to the extent that such standards and conditions are applicable to development within the PD District); 3. The traffic estimated to be generated by the plan is generally consistent with the original, Board approved traffic impact analysis as updated; Article I. General Provisions Page 7 4. The plan includes the necessary on-site or adjacent traffic improvements to accommodate traffic generated by the plan (e.g., turn lanes, stacking lanes, signalization, etc.); 5. The preliminary drainage study for the plan indicates that the proposed development can be achieved without increasing the upstream or downstream water surface elevation on property owned by third parties and that detention and drainage areas can be improved in a natural manner approved by the Board; and 6. Landscaping for the Town Edge Landscaping Zone (as hereinafter defined) promotes continuity and unity consistent with the landscape plan for the development and encourages views to public open space and public landmarks. E. Conditions. The Commission,or the Board on appeal,may establish such conditions to the approval of a PD Site Plan as are reasonably necessary to assure that the approval criteria are met. F. Appeal from Commission Action. If the Commission approves a PD Site Plan with conditions or if it disapproves a PD Site Plan, the applicant may appeal the decision to the Board by filing a written request with the Town Secretary within ten (10) days after the Commission's decision. G. Variances. If the applicant requests a variance from any PD Ordinance standards or other requirements of the Applicable Town Ordinances(as defined in the PD Ordinance),the variance request will be forwarded to the Board with the Commission's recommendation for decision. Except as otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance the procedures and criteria for approval shall be those applicable to variances under the UDC. H. Amendment. PD Site Plans are not considered part of a PD Ordinance. Except as otherwise provided in this Subsection, any amendment to an approved PD Site Plan must be approved by the Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, "minor modifications" to any PD Site Plan may be approved by the Town Planner. A "minor modification" to a PD Site Plan is defined as any modification that does not: 1. alter the basic relationship of proposed development to adjacent property; Article I. General Provisions Page 8 2. change the uses permitted; 3. increase the maximum density, floor area, or height; 4. decrease the amount of off-street parking, unless parking remains sufficient in number and conforms to ordinance requirements; or 5. reduce the minimum yards or setbacks. However, if the Town Planner believes that a minor modification entails a significant change in the Site Plan, he may refer the request to the Commission for a determination. Section 7.4 Relationship of Plans to Comprehensive Plan, Transportation Plan and Open Space Plan The PD Concept Plan attempts to establish regulatory standards that reflect the policies and objectives contained in the Comprehensive Plan, Thoroughfare Plan, and Open Space Plan for the Town in effect on the date of the passage of this PD Ordinance and to effect the Town's plan for provision of public facilities and services. SECTION 8 COMPLIANCE WITH CODE REQUIRED All development of land within the PD shall conform to the requirements of this Ordinance, and no person may use, occupy, sell or develop land, buildings or other structures, or authorize or permit the use, occupancy, sale or development of land,buildings or other structures under his/her control, except in accordance with all applicable provisions of this PD. Article I. General Provisions Page 9 ARTICLE IL PERMITTED USES SECTION 1 USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT The following uses are permitted as principal uses by right. Agricultural Uses Orchard Plant Nursery (Growing) Farms General (Crops) Farms General (Livestock Ranch) Commercial Uses Offices (General) Studio Information Processing Data Center Amusement/Recreation Golf Course (Public or Private) Park or Playground (Public or Private) Country Club (Private Membership) Golf Clubhouse (Public or Private) Recreation Center (Private) Hike, Bike and Equestrian Trails (Public or Private) SECTION 2 ACCESSORY USES The following uses are specifically permitted as accessory uses to principal uses to serve the occupants of the building or to facilitate the development of the building. This Section does not exclude other land uses which are generally considered accessory to a principal use. An accessory use which is customarily incidental to a principal use, and which is located on the same lot as the principal use (though it may be located in a separate structure), shall be a permitted accessory use without being separately listed in this Section. Agricultural Uses Stables (Private Use) Temporary Accommodations for Employees/Customers/Visitors Institutional and Governmental Uses Emergency Ambulance Service Post Office (Governmental) Mailing Service (Private) Article II. Permitted Uses Page 10 Hell stop/Verti-stop Clinic Child Daycare (Private; 7 or more) School (Vocational) Telephone, Electric, Cable, and Fiber Optic Switching Station Utility Distribution Lines Water and Sewage Pumping Station (below Grade) Water, Sewer, Electric, and Gas Meters Electric Transformers Private Streets/Alleys Commercial Uses Banks and Financial Institutions Commons Uses(retail and personal service uses combined in one structure to serve the office facility) Personal Services Research and Development Facility for Computer Software Hotel/Motel with Conferencing Facility Laundry/Dry Cleaning (Drop/Pick) Shoe Repair Beauty Parlor/Barbershop Quick Copy/Duplicating Services Convenience Store Drug Store Stationery and/or Book Store Art Gallery/Museums Retail Stores - General (Excluding Second Hand Goods) Restaurant/Cafe Parking Structure Cafeteria (Private) Job Printing, Lithography, Printing or Blueprinting Temporary Batching Plant Amusement/Recreation Athletic Fields (Private) Athletic Courts (Private) Heath/Spa Facilities (Private) Greenhouse (Private) Satellite Dish Auto Services Vehicle Maintenance (Private) Wholesale Trade Article IL Permitted Uses Page I1 Temporary Construction Office (limited to period of construction) Temporary Construction Materials Storage (limited to period of construction) SECTION 3 USES PERMITTED BY SPECIFIC USE PERMITS (SUP) The following uses are permitted only after first obtaining a "Specific Use Permit" as set forth in the Unified Development Code. Agricultural Uses Stables (As a Business) Institutional and Government Uses Electrical Substation Utility Shop and Storage Water and Sewage Pumping Station (above grade) Water Storage Tank and Pumping System (elevated or above grade) Commercial Medical Laboratory R&D Laboratory Wholesale Trade Temporary Sales Office Article II. Permitted Uses Page 12 ARTICLE III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION 1 DENSITY AND SITE COVERAGE Section 1.1 Floor Area Ratio The maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") shall be 0.375:1. The transportation mitigation measures shall be placed in service prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the FAR as shown on illustration Figure 1. Section 1.2 Lot Coverage A minimum of twenty percent (20%) pervious area shall be required, excluding the 100 year flood plain, the interior of surface parking lots, and the Town Edge. Article III. Development Standards Page 13 SECTION 1 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1 FAR IMPROVEMENTS TO BE IN SERVICE 0 to .25 1. SH-114 at Precinct Line Road Reassign the westbound Service Road to provide one exclusive through-lane, one shared left-through-lane, and one exclusive left-turn lane. 2. SH-114 at Kirkwood Boulevard Add traffic signalization to the interchange. 3. Kirkwood Boulevard at Precinct Line Road a. Add traffic signalization to the intersection. b. Construct a major site driveway with a two-lane approach opposite Kirkwood Boulevard to take advantage of the traffic signal. 4. Other Major driveways on Precinct Line Road and Lake Turner Parkway may require future signalization and should be assessed as warranted by demand. Site access drives which are not at major intersections may require future signalizations and should be assessed as warranted by demand and be funded by the private sector. .26 to .30 1. SH-114 at Precinct Line Road Reassign the westbound Service Road to provide one exclusive through-lane, one shared left-through-lane, and one exclusive left-turn lane. Article III. Development Standards Page 14 2. SH-114 at Kirkwood Boulevard Add traffic signalization to the interchange. 3. Kirkwood Boulevard at Precinct Line Road a. Add traffic signalization to the intersection. b. Construct a major site driveway with a three-lane approach opposite Kirkwood Boulevard to take advantage of the traffic signal. 4. Other Major driveways on Precinct Lime Road and Lake Turner Parkway may require future signalization and should be assessed as warranted by demand. Site access drives which are not at major intersections may require future signalizations and should be assessed as warranted by demand and be funded by the private sector. 5. SH-114 at Trophy Club Drive Construct an additional northbound through-lane on Trophy Club Drive at the westbound Service Road intersection to provide four-lane approaches, assign dual northbound left-turn lanes. .31 to .35 1. SH-114 at Precinct Line Road Reassign the westbound Service Road to provide one exclusive through-lane, one shared left-through-lane, and one exclusive left-turn lane. 2. SH-114 at Kirkwood Boulevard Add traffic signalization to the interchange. 3. Kirkwood Boulevard at Precinct Line Road a. Add traffic signalization to the intersection. Article M. Development Standards Page 15 b. Construct a major site driveway with a three-lane approach opposite Kirkwood Boulevard to take advantage of the traffic signal. C. Construct additional left-turn lane on northbound approach of Precinct Line Road to provide a three-lane approach. d. Construct additional right-turn lane on northbound approach of Precinct Line Road at Kirkwood Boulevard. 4. Other Major driveways on Precinct Line Road and Lake Turner Parkway may require future signalization and should be assessed as warranted by demand. Site access drives which are not at major intersections may require future signalizations and should be assessed as warranted by demand and be funded by the private sector. 5. SH-114 at Trophy Club Drive Construct an additional northbound through-lane on Trophy Club Drive at the westbound Service Road intersection to provide four-lane approaches, assign dual northbound left-turn lanes. .36 to .375 1. SH-114 at Precinct Line Road Reassign the westbound Service Road to provide one exclusive through-lane, one shared left-through-lane, and one exclusive left-turn lane. 2. SH-114 at Kirkwood Boulevard Add traffic signalization to the interchange. 3. Kirkwood Boulevard at Precinct Line Road a. Add traffic signalization to the intersection. b. Construct a major site driveway with a Article III. Development Standards Page 16 three-lane approach opposite Kirkwood Boulevard to take advantage of the traffic signal. C. Construct additional left-turn lane at northbound approach of Precinct Line Road to provide a three-lane approach. d. Construct additional left-turn lane on westbound approach opposite Kirkwood Boulevard to provide a three-lane approach. 4. Other Major driveways on Precinct Line Road and Lake Turner Parkway may require future signalization and should be assessed as warranted by demand. Site access drives which are not at major intersections may require future signalizations and should be assessed as warranted by demand and be funded by the private sector. 5. SH-114 at Trophy Club Drive a. Construct an additional northbound through-lane on Trophy Club Drive at the westbound Service Road intersection to provide four-lane approaches, assign dual northbound left-turn lanes. b. Construct additional southbound through-lane on Trophy Club Drive at the westbound Service Road intersection to provide four-lane approach. Article I1I. Development Standards Page 17 SECTION 2 MINIMUM LOT SIZE The minimum lot size shall be 200,000 square feet. SECTION 3 MINIMUM LOT WIDTH The minimum lot width shall be 200 feet. SECTION 4 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT Section 4.1 General Except as provided below, and as limited by Section 10 of this Article III and the Concept Plan, the height limit for all structures shall be the lesser of five stories above grade or 75 feet. The height of all structures shall be measured from the average grade around the perimeter of the building except for that portion of the property adjacent to and abutting Dove Road which shall be limited to 735 feet above mean sea level (MSL) for a distance of 1500 feet north between Precinct Line Road and the western edge of the site as shown on the Concept Plan. In addition, building height shall be setback based on a 5:1 slope from the closet residential property line, and a 2:1 slope from adjacent public streets. Section 4.2 Exceptions to Height Requirements The height limits imposed above shall not apply to (a) chimneys and vent stacks, church spires, elevator shafts, penthouses, cupolas, entry features, skylights, or other architectural features that are not intended for occupancy or storage; (b) flag poles and similar devices; or (c) heating and air conditioning equipment, solar collectors, and similar equipment, fixtures and devices provided such equipment, fixtures, and devices are screened from view with a solid wall that is architecturally consistent with the design of the building to which they are attached. SECTION 5 MINIMUM PRIMARY BUILDING SIZE The minimum primary building size shall be 3,000 square feet. SECTION 6 SETBACKS Section 6.1 Front Yard Setbacks A. The front yard setback shall be 100 feet. B. Required front yards must be open and unobstructed except for fences and signs allowed by this PD Ordinance, provided, however, ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices, and other architectural features may not project more than 12 inches into the required front yard. Article III. Development Standards Page 18 C. The front yard setback is measured from the front lot line or from the required right-of-way, whichever creates the greater setback. D. A front yard setback shall be provided from all boundaries of the PD area. Section 6.2 Rear Yard Setbacks A. The rear yard setback shall be 100 feet. B. Required rear yards must be open and unobstructed except for fences and signs allowed by this PD Ordinance; provided, however, that ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices, and other architectural features may not project more than 12 inches into the required rear yard. A fireplace chimney may project up to two feet into the required rear yard if its area of projection does not exceed 12 square feet. Roof eaves may project up to three feet into the required rear yard. Balconies may not project into the required rear yard. C. The rear yard setback is measured from the rear lot line. D. A person need not provide a full rear yard setback for an accessory structure if the structure does not exceed 15 feet in height. Where the rear yard is adjacent to an alley, a three-foot setback must be provided. Where the rear yard is not adjacent to an alley, no setback is required. Section 6.3 Side Yard Setbacks A. The side yard setback shall be 75 feet. B. Required side yards must be open and unobstructed except for fences and signs allowed by this PD Ordinance- provided, however, that ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices, and other architectural features may not project more than 12 inches into the required side yard. A fireplace chimney may project up to two feet into the required side yard if its area of projection does not exceed 12 square feet. Cantilevered roof eaves may project up to three feet into the required side yard. Balconies may not project into the required side yard. C. The side yard setback is measured from the side lot line, except when a front yard is treated as a side yard, in which case the setback is measured from the lot line or the required right-of-way, whichever creates the greater setback. D. Air conditioning units may be located in the required side yard, but not nearer than one foot to the property line. E. A person need not provide a side yard setback for an accessory structure if the structure does not exceed 15 feet in height and is located in the rear 30 percent of the lot. Article III. Development Standards Page 19 SECTION 7 FENCING A. The maximum height of any fence is seven feet, measured from the average grade level at the base of the fence. B. Chain link fences are prohibited unless they are completely screened from adjacent public roadways, from all public open space and from all golf courses. C. Only split rail, steel pipe, iron cable and turnbuckles, and living fences are allowed adjacent to public roadways, public open space and golf course uses unless otherwise approved by the Commission. D. Solid fences(defined as any fence with more than 40% of its wall surface constructed of solid masonry) not more than 3.5 feet high are allowed (i) within any front, side, or rear yard setbacks and within 10 feet of any public roadway or public open space and (ii) within any front, side, or rear yard setback if the fence complies with the following standards: 1. The wall area of the fence is comprised of at least 40% open fencing, including such materials as iron, split rail, steel pipe, cable with turnbuckle or wood rail; and 2. The remaining solid portion of the fence complies with the following standards: a) section lengths between columns shall not exceed 30 feet; b) if two 30-foot sections are contiguous, the next section must be curved or otherwise offset so as to achieve at least a five foot articulation; C) no more than 60 feet of solid fencing will be permitted unless 20% of the length of the solid fence portion is screened by berms (with an average height of three feet) and plantings (with an average height of two feet); d) the solid portion of the fence shall have an average distance of 10 feet from public roadways and public open space; e) the fence shall be designed and constructed to avoid significant trees; and f) the fence shall not obstruct sight distance requirements at roadway intersections. E. Retaining walls are not visible from public roadways, public open space and golf course are permitted. Article III. Development Standards Page 20 SECTION 8 EXTERIOR WALLS AND BUILDING ARTICULATION Section 8.1 Buildings of 100 square feet or more and over nine feet in height Exterior walls for all primary buildings of 100 square feet or more and over nine feet in height as well as accessory buildings which are greater than 3,000 square feet in floor area (except greenhouses and barns), shall be constructed of at least eighty percent (80%) masonry construction(excluding windows, doors and screening of mechanicals) unless said wall is on a porch, patio, courtyard, or breezeway, in which event, said wall may be of non-masonry construction. Accent and trim materials may include architectural precast concrete commonly known as "cast stone", stucco/EIFS, ornamental metal panel, spandrel glass, tile and architectural fiberglass - GFRC, as well as those materials listed at Section 3.2 of Article V Of the UDC. Section 8.2 Exterior Materials for Accessory Buildings Exterior materials for accessory buildings shall be chosen to either minimize the building's presence and subsequently blend into the surroundings or compliment the materials of the primary building. Except as provided in Section 8.1, acceptable materials include: A. Stucco /EIFS B. Painted Metal Panel C. Treated Timber D. Fiberglass Panel E. Precast Masonry Units F. Glass G. Brick In addition, landscape screening, berms and strategic siting shall be employed where possible as methods to minimize the building's presence. Section 8.3 Building Articulation A. Except as provided in paragraph B, below, buildings shall meet the articulation standards of the UDC. B. Alternatively, facade articulations may include the use of materials that vary and manipulate window fenestrations, varying the size of window openings through the use of one and two story design expressions and the application of surface materials. Facade articulations should include: 1. Variation of building materials; 2. Manipulation of the building massing; 3. Color/texture; 4 Architectural elements: columns, pilasters, cornices; Article III. Development Standards Page 21 5. Fenestration: varying window openings/size; and 6. Architectural detailing of the surface material: corbeling, reveals, relief, profiles. To utilize the alternative articulation standards of this paragraph B, elevation drawings shall be submitted to the Town Planner following schematic design. The Town Planner shall review the elevation for compliance with the intent of this Section. The Town Planner shall make a determination of compliance within 30 days from the date that drawings are submitted. If no determination is made within the 30 day period, the elevation shall be deemed to have been approved. Section 8.4 Exceptions Exceptions to the requirements of Sections 8.1, 8.2, and 8.3 of this Article may be permitted on a case by case basis by the Town Planner upon submission and approval of elevational drawings of the subject structure and material samples. SECTION 9 LIGHTING STANDARDS Section 9.1 Lighting Elements The following lighting elements are allowed: A. Lighting to illuminate (1) building facades (both from above and below), (2) building entrances, (3) building loading and service areas, and (4) any other areas for security purposes. B. Lighting for all pedestrian areas including, but not limited to, courtyards, entryways, sidewalks, walkways, hike, bike and equestrian trails, and any areas that represent a hazard or include a change in elevation (such as ramps, curbs and curb cuts), C. Lighting for parking areas, access drives, and internal vehicular circulation ; and D. Lighting for all landscaped areas. Section 9.2 Lighting Standards A. Illumination. Illumination shall not exceed 0.2 foot candles per square foot at any single family property line. B. Glare. Fixture design and orientation shall minimize glare as viewed from roadways. All direct down lighting shall be accomplished with shielded lights with total cutoff above 80 degrees. All fixtures located at a site perimeter shall be equipped with a shield to reduce spill light outside the site. C. Luminaire Height. 1. Luminaries used for building security or to illuminate building facades, entrances, and loading and service areas may be installed(i) on the building facade but not above the building roof line; and (ii) anywhere on the lot with a maximum height of 25 feet, but not higher than the building roof line. 2. Luminaries used to illuminate pedestrian areas shall have a maximum height of 12 feet, and no pedestrian walkways are allowed between upright fixtures and Article III. Development Standards Page 22 a building. 3. Luminaries used to illuminate parking decks shall be a maximum height of 15 feet. D. Prohibited Lighting. High pressure sodium light fixtures shall be prohibited sources of exterior lighting throughout the PD area. SECTION 10 RESIDENTIAL PROXIMITY SLOPE Section 10.1 Determination of Proximity Slope Height Restrictions Except as provided in Section 10.2 below, structures shall not exceed: (i) the height of a line drawn at a slope of 5:1 from an angle originating from any property line or lot line zoned for single family use, and (ii) the height of a line drawn at a slope of 2:1 from an angle originating from any right-of-way line for a public roadway. If the grade of the ground rises or falls from the point of origin of the slope line, the maximum permitted height shall increase or decrease, respectively, by the vertical measurement of the difference in grade. Section 10.2 Exceptions to Slope Requirement The height limit imposed by Section 10.1 above shall not apply to any of the following uses (regardless of their location): electrical substation or utility distribution lines. Section 10.3 Typical Illustration Article III. Development Standards Page 23 ARTICLE IV. ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS SECTION 1 STANDARDS Section 1.1 Street. The development may include roadways designed to Collector Streets, Commercial Street, Local Street and Alley standards, as well as private drives. Section 1.2 Bridging of Floodplain and Waterway Crossing the floodplain shall be allowed in the general locations shown on the Concept Plan subject to the normal Town review standards and procedures established in Article XIV Flood Plain and the Town's Engineering Standards. Article IV. Roadway Construction Standards Page 24 ARTICLE V. PARKING AND LOADING STANDARDS Parking and loading standards for each permitted use shall be those standards designated in the Unified Development Code for Office use unless modified by the following standards. SECTION 1 PARKING SPACE STANDARDS A maximum of 20% of the required parking spaces may be dimensioned for small cars. SECTION 2 OFFICE USE PARKING REQUIREMENT Parking for office uses shall be provided at a minimum ratio of one (1) space for each 300 square feet of floor area devoted to office uses. SECTION 3 HANDICAPPED PARKING Space and route design standards shall comply with all ADA and TADA design standards. SECTION 4 OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS Gross Floor Area Minimum Required Loading Spaces (Square Feet) Office Retail Office/Ind. Hotel Restaurant 0� to 20,000 none none none none none 20,001 to 40,000 1 1 1 1 1 40,001 to 100,000 1 2 2 j 1 1 100,001 to 160,000 2 2 2 2 j N/A 160,001 to 260,000 2 3 3 2 N/A 260,001 to 360,000 3 3 3 3 N/A 360,001 to 460,000 3 4 4 3 N/A -- — — --- - 460,001 to 600,000 3 5 5 3 N/A 600,001 + 4 Study Study_ 3 N/A SECTION 5 LIGHTING OF PARKING AND LOADING AREAS Lighting of parking and loading areas shall be done in accordance with the requirements of the UDC, as may be modified by Section 9 of Article III of this Ordinance. Article V. Parking and Loading Standards Page 25 ARTICLE VI. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SECTION 1 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY Section 1.1 Purpose It is the intent of this Article to preserve and protect the unique natural beauty and environment of the Town; to preserve and enhance views from public roadways; to provide visual buffering and screening for service and loading areas and for parking areas; to enhance and beautify the freeway edges; to ensure that significant natural features of native trees, views and significant topography involving water bodies are preserved; to provide a general tree cover that will assist private properties in the development of energy conservation measures; and to provide for the health and comfort of the public by providing tree canopy for parking lot areas. Section 1.2 Applicability This Article applies to all new development within the PD. SECTION 2 PROCEDURES Section 2.1 Prior to Issuing a Building Permit Prior to the issuance of any building permit, a tree survey and protection plan, a landscape plan, a grading plan and an irrigation plan must be submitted and approved as part of the PD Site Plan process. These plans may be combined on one or more drawings. Section 2.2 Variations Approved on PD Site Plan The Board may approve variations to requirements set out in this PD when approving a PD Site Plan in which such variations are clearly identified. SECTION 3 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Section 3.1 General- The Town's standards for roadway landscape zones and roadway median landscape development only apply to public roadways. These standards will not apply to private roadways constructed on site. A. Existing Trees and Ponds. Existing trees and ponds shall be preserved and protected whenever possible and may be enhanced pursuant to the provisions of this PD Ordinance and the PD Concept Plan. B. Sight Distance Easements at Street and Driveway Intersections. Landscaping must meet the requirements for sight distance easements as established in the UDC. C. Provision of Landscaping.Requirements are divided into the following categories: 1) town edge landscape zone (illustrated on Figure IA and 113); 2) roadway landscape zone (illustrated on Figures 2A and 2B)1- 3) B);3) roadway median landscape zone (illustrated on Figure 3)1- 4) );4) parking lot landscaping (illustrated on Figures 4A, 413, 4C, 4D and 4E)1- 5) E);5) screening of parking (illustrated on Figures 5A, 513, 5C, and 5D); 6) structured parking landscaping (illustrated on Figure 6),- 7) );7) general site tree planting (illustrated on Figure 7); and Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 26 8) screening of loading and service areas (illustrated on Figures 8A, 813, 8C and 8D); and 9) plant material sizes and tree pits (illustrated on Figures 9A and 913). D. Landscape Plan. The form of landscape plans shall conform generally to the sample landscape plan in the UDC. Section 3.2 Town Edge Landscape Zones A. Intent. It is the intent of this subsection to preserve and enhance the Town's highly visible edge in order to reinforce the rural and natural qualities of the community and to contribute to the health, safety and welfare of the community. This zone can facilitate positive vistas to prominent knolls and valleys while softening development with tree massings that will establish a unique rural environment for the Town. B. Location of Town Edge Landscape Zones. 1. State Highway 114 There shall be a landscape zone along S.H. 114. The landscape zone shall have an average width of 150 feet and a minimum width of 70 feet from the highway right-of-way, as shown on the Concept Plan. C. Landscape Treatment of Town Edge Landscape Zones. 1. Alternative Treatments. The Town edge landscape zone may be treated in one of two ways, at the option of the owner, by an earth berm or forested edge as set out below. 2. Earth Berm. a) State Highway 114. The earth berm may vary in width and height but shall have a maximum 5:1 slope from the property line to the ridge line and a maximum 3:1 slope from the highway right-of-way line to the ridge line. The berm shall be a minimum height of six (6) feet. b) Wildflowers. Wildflowers may be planted along the berm. C) Trees. Trees shall be planted along the earth berm in the following manner. • Quantity: There shall be a minimum of thirteen (13) trees per 10,000 square feet of the area measured from the ridge line of the berm to the edge of the landscape zone that is not adjacent to the highway right-of-way line. • Size: At least 60% of the trees shall be large trees, and the remainder shall be small trees. 3. Forested Edge. a) As an alternative to creating an earth berm, a developer may elect to create a forested edge within the Town edge landscape zone, which includes a minimum of seventeen(17) trees per 10,000 square feet of the entire area of the Town edge landscape zone. At least 60% of the trees shall be large trees, and the remainder shall be small trees. Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 27 b) Wildflowers may be planted within the zone. Section 3.3 Roadway Landscape Zones A. Intent. It is the intent of Roadway Landscape Zones to preserve existing tree thickets and create newly planted tree groves in tight natural appearing clusters, which create a rural edge and definition of roadways in the Town. B. Application. Roadway Landscape Zones occur on all public streets. C. Zone Width. The width of the landscape zone is measured from the outside edge of the street pavement to the required building setback line on both sides of the street. D. Landscape Requirement. 1. Tree Density. A minimum of six (6) trees are required per one hundred (100) linear feet of landscape zone on each side of the roadway, which may be planted anywhere within the Roadway Landscape Zone. Credit will be given for maintaining existing trees of equal or greater size which are listed in the Town's Approved Plant List. 2. Tree Size. There shall be a minimum of sixty percent large trees with the remainder being small trees. Tree sizes and measurement shall conform to Subsection 3.10, Acceptable Landscape Materials. 3. Protected Trees. Protected trees of 8 inch or greater caliper identified in Article IX Tree Preservation, that are to be removed within a roadway R.O.W., shall be replaced with trees from the Town's Approved Plant List. A sufficient number of trees shall be planted to equal, in caliper, the diameter of the protected tree(s) that are removed. The replacement trees shall be located first within the Roadway Zone. If there is not sufficient planting space within the Roadway Zone to meet the tree replacement requirements, then they may be planted within other portions of the lot, in the median (if present), or on other land or roadways in the subdivision or Township. Section 3.4 Roadway Median Landscape Development A. Intent. It is the Intent of this subsection to ensure that medians, resulting from roadway construction shall contribute to the rural character of the community through forestation. B. Application. This standard applies to any medians that occur within roadways in the Town. C. Landscape Requirement. 1. Tree Density. Medians may vary in width, and shall contain a minimum of thirteen (13) trees per 10,000 square foot of median area. 2. Tree Size. There shall be a minimum of sixty percent large trees with the remainder being small trees. Tree sizes and measurement shall conform to Subsection 3.10 Acceptable Landscape Materials. Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 28 3. Tree Placement. Tree placement and arrangement shall be in tight clusters and groupings, tying median and street shoulders together to achieve a complete street corridor that is as natural and rural in appearance as possible. Section 3.5 Parking Lot Landscaping A. Intent. It is the intent of this subsection to provide landscape development within parkin lots that maintains and enhances the rural, natural qualities of the Town, while providing shade and breaking up large parking areas. Tree planting requirements also help reduce the impact of automobiles on the environment, help to reduce solar damage to automobiles, and provide visitors with a healthier and more comfortable environment. Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 29 B. Landscape Areas. 1. Parking Lots. Surface parking lots shall include a minimum of sixty (60) square feet of landscaped area for each required off-street parking space. A maximum of 200 parking spaces is permitted in each defined parking lot. Parking located in parking structures is not included in the calculation of required landscape area. 2. Parking Lot Edge. A Parking Lot Edge shall surround each parking lot and shall be a minimum often(10)feet wide. The Parking Lot Edge may overlap any parking setback line. When separating two parking lots, the Parking Lot Edge along the outside perimeter of each parking lot shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide and shall contain an average minimum three (3) foot high berm, as measured from the higher of the curb or paving elevation. If there is a three(3) foot or greater differential in the elevations of the edges of the parking lots being separated, then screening in the Parking Lot Edge shall be provided using one of the following options: (a) an average two 2) foot berm, as measured from the higher of the curb or paving elevation or (b) a two (2) foot high planting or hedge. Parking Lot Edges may facilitate the grading and terracing of parking lots on a site. 3. Location of Required Landscape Area. Required landscape area shall occur entirely within the parking lot and Parking Lot Edge. C. Landscape Requirement. 1. General. Required landscape areas may take the form of 'Parking Lot Edges", "Spot Islands" or "Linear Islands", depending on site design and the preservation of natural site features. All islands within parking lots shall occur in one of two general forms: Spot Islands or Linear Islands. All required landscape areas shall: a) be planted with living plant materials; b) allow for pedestrian walking surfaces across them to provide improved pedestrian circulation across the parking lots (except those Spot Islands described in CA. below); and C) have a minimum of one (1) tree located in each island. Twenty-five percent(25%) of all Spot Islands shall include a row of small shrubs the length of the Spot Island (except those Spot Islands described in CA(b) below) and twenty-five percent (25%) of all Spot Islands shall be planted with ground cover, resulting in fifty percent (50%) of all Spot Islands planted with either small shrubs or ground cover. 2. Tree Density. There shall be a minimum of one (1) tree per 2.5 parking spaces in all parking areas. These trees may be planted anywhere within the parking lot (including Spot Islands and Linear Islands) or within the Parking Lot Edge. 3. Tree Size. At least 60% of the trees shall be large trees, and the remainder shall be small trees. Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 30 4. Spot Islands. A Spot Island shall be located within a maximum fifteen (15) feet of each parking space (measured from the nearest curb line of the island to the nearest point on the edge of the parking space). Spot Islands shall be either (a) a minimum of six (6) feet wide by eighteen (18) feet long, (b) a minimum of five(5)feet wide by five(5)feet long (limited to 25% of the total number of spot islands in a 200 space parking cell) or (c) a minimum of nine (9)feet wide by eighteen(18)feet long. Spot Islands shall be measured from inside curb to inside curb. The location of Spot Islands shall recognize convenient pedestrian circulation routes and walks. 5. Linear Islands. Linear Islands shall not be less than five (5) feet in width and shall be designed as long and narrow planted strips, breaking larger lots into smaller linear parking cells. Linear Islands are appropriate on sites of steeper terrain, running parallel with existing topographic contours, to preserve existing trees and better integrate existing rural topography. Linear Islands shall be located within a maximum fifteen (15) feet of each parking space (measured from the nearest curb line of the island to the nearest point on the edge of the parking space). 6. Existing Trees and Natural Features. Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in subsections 3.3(C)(4) and 3.3(C)(5) above, the location of all landscaped islands should be adjusted to accommodate existing trees or other natural features, provided that the total landscape area requirements are met. Section 3.6 Structured Parking Landscaping All structured parking facilities shall be bordered by a 25' landscaped zone that will employ a combination of naturally formed berms with a range in height of plant material which is scaled to the vertical dimension of the structure. An average height of landscaping treatment of 10'-0" shall be maintained to the lowest level of exposed facade. Section 3.7 Screening of Surface Parking A. General. It is the intent of this subsection to screen all parking areas from public roadways and from publicly dedicated open space. The screen shall be a minimum of thirty-six (36) inches in height and shall be achieved through one of the following methods: 1. A berm; or 2. A planting screen, or 3. A combination of the above; or 4. Otherwise as shown on an approved PD Site Plan. B. Parking Lot Edge. Screening shall generally be placed within the parking lot edge. Section 3.8 General Site Tree Planting A. Intent. It is the intent of this subsection to plant trees to improve energy conservation and Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 31 comfort levels, as well as to enhance the rural character of the Town. Tree groupings located in close proximity to buildings on the south and southwest sides will reduce sun exposure, glare and heat build-up, particularly during the warm summer months. Conversely, chilling winter winds from the north and northwest can be buffered and re-directed with proper tree plantings. Early spring and summer breezes should be re-directed toward external public spaces to enhance the comfort and enjoyment of these protected areas. B. Method to Determine Tree Requirement. 1. Land Area. General site tree density is derived from the amount of permeable green space on the site (excluding Town edge landscape zones, roadway landscape zones, parking lot Spot Islands and Linear Islands, parking lot edges and screening for loading and service areas). Permeable green space is defined as planted or grassed areas, as opposed to impervious surfaces such as building or parking areas, plazas and walkways. 2. Tree Requirement. A total minimum of twenty-five (25) large trees shall remain or be planted per acre of the site's permeable green space (along with native plant species). This quantity of trees is in addition to trees required in parking areas, the Town edge landscape zone, roadway landscape zones, roadway medians and in screening of loading and service areas. C. Tree Size. All trees shall be large trees (however, two ornamental trees may be substituted for one large tree). Section 3.9 Screening of Loading and Service Areas A. Intent. it is the intent of this subsection to screen service and loading areas from residential areas and from publicly dedicated open space and public roadways. It is also the intent of this subsection to screen dumpsters from view. B. Screening of Loading and Service Areas. 1. All off-street service and loading areas which abut a residential area or publicly dedicated open space or public roadways must be screened from view with a landscape reserve along such service or loading area. Screening within the landscape reserve may be accomplished through one of the following methods (at the option of the owner): a) A wall plus a minimum of one large tree planted per each thirty (30) linear feet of landscape reserve; or b) Large evergreen shrubs with an initial height that will create a solid planting within two (2) years plus a minimum of one large tree planted per each thirty (30) linear feet of landscape reserve; or C) Evergreen trees planted to create a solid planting within two (2) years at a minimum height of eight (8) feet. Trees shall be a species of Eldarica Pine, Savannah Holly, Leyland Cypress or [other species]; or d) A berm with evergreen shrubs planted to create solid planting within two (2) years plus a minimum of one large tree for each thirty (30) linear feet of the berm. The minimum height of the berm shall be three (3) feet, measured from the highest existing elevation of the landscape reserve. Berm side-slopes shall not exceed a 3:I slope (to allow safe mowing and maintenance of the slope). Evergreen shrubs shall be Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 32 planted on the berm for an extra five (5) feet minimum screen height. Furthermore, a minimum of one large tree shall be planted for each thirty (30) linear feet of the berm. C. Screening of Dumpsters. 1. Placement. Dumpsters shall be located at the side or rear of the property outside of the required building setback areas. 2. Screening. Dumpsters shall be screened on three sides, using one of the following methods (at the option of the owner): a) A masonry wall enclosure (compatible with adjacent architecture) of a height that is a minimum of one foot above the top of the dumpster; or b) A planting enclosure of large evergreen shrubs planted a minimum of four(4)feet apart that shall create a solid screen to a minimum height of seven (7) feet within two (2) years; or C) A combination of the above; or d) Otherwise as shown on an approved PD Site Plan. Section 3.10 Acceptable Landscape Materials A. No Artificial Plants. No artificial plant materials may be used to satisfy the requirements of this PD. B. Plants Meeting Landscape Requirements. Plant materials used to meet the landscape requirements of this PD Ordinance must comply with the following minimum size standards at the time of installation (acceptable landscape materials are illustrated at Figure 8). 1. Large Trees. Large trees must have a minimum caliper of three (3) inches, and a minimum height of ten (10) feet. 2. Small Trees. Small trees must have a minimum caliper of two (2) inches and a minimum height of eight (8) feet. 3. Ornamental Trees. Ornamental trees must have a minimum height of eight (8) feet. 4. Large Evergreen Shrub. A large evergreen shrub must have a minimum height of three (3) feet. S. Small Shrub. Small shrubs must be a minimum of a three (3) gallon container in size. 6. Vines. Vines must be a minimum of a one (1) gallon container in size. 7. Ground Cover. Ground cover must be a minimum of a four (4) inch pot container in size. 8. Grass. Solid sod, Hydro-Mulch or seeding may be used. C. Height of Plant Material. Material height is measured from the top of the root ball Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 33 C. Height of Plant Material. Material height is measured from the top of the root ball or, if the plant is in a container, from the soil level in the container. D. Plant Species. In satisfying the landscaping requirements of this PD Ordinance, the use of high-quality,hardy and drought-tolerant plant materials which are listed in the Town's approved plant list is required. SECTION 4 IRRIGATION REQUIREMENTS Section 4.1 General The owner shall be responsible for the health and vitality of plant material through irrigation, except for natural and undisturbed areas, of all landscaped areas and plant materials, and shall: A. Provide a moisture level in an amount and frequency adequate to sustain growth of the plant materials on a permanent basis. B. Ensure that such plant materials are in place and operational at the time of landscape inspection at least nine months after the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. C. Ensure that such plant materials are maintained and kept operational at all times to provide for efficient water distribution. Section 4.2 Irrigation Methods A. Landscaped Areas. One of the following irrigation methods shall be used to ensure adequate watering of plant material in landscaped areas (at the option of the owner): 1. Conventional System. An automatic or manual underground irrigation system (which may be a conventional spray or bubbler type heads). 2. Drip or Leaky-Pipe System. An automatic or manual underground irrigation system in conjunction with a water-saving system such as a drip or leaky pipe system. 3. Temporary and Above Ground Watering. Landscape areas utilizing xeriscape plants and installation techniques, including areasplanted with native grasses and wildflowers, may use a temporary and above ground system,and the owner shall be required to provide irrigation in such areas for the first two growing seasons only. B. Natural and Undisturbed Areas. No irrigation shall be required for undisturbed natural areas or undisturbed existing trees. SECTION 5 LANDSCAPE COMPLETION REQUIREMENTS Section 5.1 Landscaping Required Prior to Certificate of Occupancy Except as otherwise provided, all landscaping must be completed in accordance with an approved Landscape Plan prior to after the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Section 5.2 Performance Bond Notwithstanding Section 5.1 above, the property owner may provide the Town with a performance bond or other security described in Article VII, Section 7, approved by the Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 34 Town that ensures that the landscaping will be completed within 9 months from the date of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The bond shall be for an amount that would pay for the cost of completing the approved Landscape Plan if the property owner were to fail to comply within the 9 month period. SECTION 6 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS Section 6.1 Owner Responsibility Property owners shall be responsible for maintaining all landscaping on their property, including the area between the property line and the curb line of any public street. Specifically, property owners will be responsible for: A. The regular maintenance of all required landscape areas and plant materials in a vigorous and healthy condition, free from weeds and litter. This maintenance shall include weeding, watering, fertilization, pruning, mowing, edging, mulching and other needed maintenance, in accordance with generally accepted horticultural practice; B. The regular maintenance, repair or replacement of landscape structures (walls, fences, etc.) to a structurally sound condition, and C. The regular maintenance, repair or replacement of any screening or buffering required. Section 6.2 Enforcement Failure to regularly maintain in accordance with this PD will constitute a violation of this PD and will be subject to enforcement in accordance with the UDC. Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 35 SECTION 7 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1: A. Town Edge Landscape Zone - six foot earth berm B. Town Edge Landscape Zone - forested edge Figure 2: A. Roadway Landscape Zone - zone width B. Roadway Landscape Zone - tree planting requirements Figure 3: Roadway Median Landscape Zone Figure 4: A. Parking Lot Landscaping - alternative 1 B. Parking Lot Landscaping - alternative 2 C. Spot Islands (6' x 18' and 9' x 18') - minimum standards D. Spot Islands (5' x 5') - minimum standards E. Linear Islands - minimum standards Figure 5: A. Off-Street Parking Screening - planting B. Off-Street Parking Screening - wall fence C. Off-Street Parking Screening - berm D. Off-Street Parking Screening - rail fence with vines Figure 6: Structured Parking Figure 7: General Site Tree Planting Figure 8: A. Off-Street Loading - pairing of docks B. Off-Street Loading - buffer reserves for docks C. Off-Street Loading - screening of docks D. Off-Street Loading - screening of dumpsters Figure 9: A. Plant Material Sizes B. Tree Pits Article VI. Landscape Requirements Page 36 Figure lA Town Edge landscape Zone - six foot earth berm TO^N EDG= ------ LA\D5:APE ZONE- (7�IDTH vARIEW • i NIGH/�AY R.O.W. I I 5cE ScC.T10` E.LOW . I � i i e i I / I I _\;RSE (60: CSS) / RIDGS 0= EERM (b F' minlm.v n h.elo�t) HIGHJVAr' MAX MAX 1 State Highway 114 Town Edge Berm Not to Scale Figure 1B Town Edge Landscape Zone - forested edge LA\:*SAO= Zo\= (n 7-H VA¢�SJ ¢o^ I I 80' To z 143' ao' / I I7 TREES �-.N LA\�5oAPE �.�¢,_ (ccn) i s�A__ leo ) Zo\E State Highway 114 Forested Edge Not to Scale Figure 2A Roadway Landscape Zone - zone width f }'�vit�ltrEi� To • ' � S�A�K 1JFJ�. �1f,URF- zg Fog TRS D�I.Ltt� �EbzlltR�}r1��rTS C11' UNOSc�t C zoN� Figure 2B Roadway Landscape Zone - tree planting requirements t I I 1 sTFza T �uxT reams Pte• . 1 )97-NT/.s Toric 7X55S. ,. ZZ X G Tis iCfq D. • /3.2 TREE'S Det /3 Stz�Go/. —LARG'e Tads /3 X Gor - 76 4c bA4044!TXE�S Y0/ `Sof l LL- T/tLE s /3 X fO 9% 6.2 C $5W LG rx&66 Figure 3 Roadway Median Landscaping :; _tv `CA Rvadmay Median-varscf Median Requirementx • 13 trees per 10,000 S.F. of median area •60%trees minimum 3" •40% calife trey minimum 2" alipohight perl8fof minimum height Figure 4A Parking Lot Landscape Alternative 1 k,, A 15'of a spot island rl>o L I . C 10'P&rking Edge 5'x5'Spot Islands 20'Between Parking Areas 7 X .L7: 7 6'xl8'Spot Islands 200 Parking Spaces with 1 tree required per 2.5 spaces :--: 80 Trees 60 S.F. of landscape area per required off-street space 12M0 S.F. of landscape area Total Parking Area: 78,162 S.F. Pavement: 63,733 S.F. Landscape Area: 14,429 S.F. Spot Islands: Type A (6' x 18') : 23 Type B (5' x 51) : 6 (21% of Total) Total : 29 Landscape Area Coverage: 19% Not to Scale Figure 4B Parking Lot Landscape Alternative 2 15'of a spot island 5'x5'Spot Islands T; Iy 10'Parking Edge 'Y 20'Between Parking Areas Ir 6'x18'Spot Islands 7; F I I I I I L 200 Parking Spaces with I tree required per 2.5 spaces — 80 Trees 60 S.F. of landscape area per required off-street space 12,000 S.F. of landscape area Total Parking Area: 82,880 S.F. Pavement: 65,491 S.F. Landscape Area: 17,389 S.F. Spot Islands: Type A (9' x 18') : 18 Type B (6' x 18') : 14 - Type C (5' x 5') : 6 (21% of Total) Total : 38 Landscape Area Coverage: 21% Not to Scale Figure 4C Spot Islands - (6 ' x 18 ' and 9 ' x la , - minimum standards R�T G11V. � 5POT 1'5LAN D5 �8 /,A (nf. Figure 4F Spot Islands (5 ' x5 ' ' minimum standards kj latAl UN1 _���ids�IJ..F. ,✓vRb p�M.�Ns"l.oN 4- TYPE- Figure 4D Linear Islands - minimum standards CoNTouRs Figure 5A PLANTING ;;I,Of I t-w 7AV77NEr : ti o v L.�s£ Sv.Yz A! I L ti�G,c,CB,y v::•:•.. Pftl�iS T !'�aPGre7�' R 0.W. Figure 5B ILAV r7ti'Y��MCf ?'G iiikfBg - ''S,t; b "' t: l•�a+tLL oto �� �, `J ofMitt. I Figure 5C BERM •I' t 1 - •� ` _ 'moi w e I O 0 1�A'r/fS/IlJ • iv.4TE Ro• • I RAIL FENCE WITH VINES Figure 5D .f t • O .o.w. 0 Cb Cb ' C CIO n LSI , 1 r UN , Q� , �n ce , rt m � ce , m ce � e � lzt 0 I Figure 7 General Site Tree Planting _ IIn 6EN6i��L SITU TIZE�, FL*M I MIN. 25 TRRV 10�C�E IL �' - • - iE � -6� N Sp�� �._ MUM REq��REM�T um� RDRDJV' r �y l.�'iJ(J�PsP'� zoN6S� l bl►.� / DJMPSR, _ � =•:���• �--� S�f��N 116 1 Figure 8A Off-Street Loading - pairing of docks A0YV7 ;;Y. :•:•i:: +AL1 ' ::Y{:t•:<%r<; �(( •' • 510 % 51D� • ' WJLL �'f/N/M/T.L` 'S4f�X/itG iS�ifLGS• Figure 8B LAND APS ��V�- Wlb774 DETEiNmgr Q)ON 5CREEFNIN; MET}10 D 1 �' CA"1MEl�C�hL I } Figure 8C METHODS OF SCREENING OFF-STREET LOADING DOCKS <�LlD u/.KL./Ft1Xx. rRCG3. • (l DIRGE rKEE PbC 30'FPAV4,9) GI �® Wi�LL//`CNct'W/TN TUE�C,�XTir� strc�Qs�socio MIN. �auo M��R-WCE MIN. ' © E'VERaAff 1 79Ee P.UN Ak7 _ 1 P TU ' E ISR 0FAONTRCB. G� MIN. ' HIN: SVER4�11/ On�M EI�RGe�NP1,>;ti?J,� Figure 8D Oaf-Street Loading - screeninb of dumpsters .Top of b�►b1 K �u�ps O S�LTIot�- MA5,OPFT WALL t�uasu F-IF �..h i~vwm�Roeii Simas- HIP 4CEi�� ` 3 s rD s Cf ra Wclzlle�RF Figure 9A Page 1 of 2 Plant Material Sizes jr fSUfc-:p/Z` � /�oVG QIIL. . .o, •� r �.,of. N� lac i U O�N�I�lENT'•4G. TRCES. Figure 9A Page 2of2 Plant Material Sizes (continued ) 3'IMN.) l�41�E E�Ei�GREF.�V SYftU6, . S�LL Sfffzl/6. <M/N. VNES. ill _ .=1 1► q�eoUNO covEiC. � cess. Sol-/fl S�tA, SSD. Figure 9B ZX L Dd'k. Tr4p .� w =11 ,� I� �,� ► ul�l I ARTICLE VII. SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following development standard shall govern development within the district notwithstanding provisions of other regulations and ordinances; providing, however, that all regulations in effect at the time of passage of this Ordinance pertaining to the same subject matter that are not expressly varied by the standards that follow shall be applied to development within the district. SECTION I VARIANCE Except as provided below,variances and special exceptions may be granted in accordance with the Town's standard procedures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Board (as part of a PD Site Plan) shall have the authority to approve (1)variances with respect to height, landscaping, open space, and signs; and/or (ii) approve increasing or decreasing the size of any land use sub-area shown on the PD Concept Plan by a maximum aggregate amount of five percent (5%). SECTION 2 CONSEQUENCES OF BOARD DENIALS Any denial by the Board of any action which requires Board approval shall be deemed a denial "without prejudice"unless this PD Ordinance expressly provides otherwise. SECTION 3 BOARD AND COMMISSION APPROVALS Except as otherwise provided by state law, all approvals of the Board or Commission required by the PD Ordinance, or the Applicable Town Ordinances shall be by simple majority vote. SECTION 4 STREET AND HEAD-IN PARKING Street parking and head-in parking are allowed on private drives and roadways. SECTION 5 SURVEY MONUMENTS Survey monuments may be set using the current standards as established by the Texas Surveyor's Association. No survey monumentation shall be permanently buried. SECTION 6 MAINTENANCE PERIOD When public infrastructure (e.g.,roadways, storm drainage, water lines, and wastewater)has been complete and accepted by the Town, there shall be provided to the Town a bond (or other security acceptable to the Commission) that will provide for the maintenance of such infrastructure for a period of one (1) year after acceptance. SECTION 7 FORM OF SECURITY If this PD Ordinance or any of the Applicable Town Ordinances requires security for any obligation imposed by such ordinance, such security may be in the form of a cash deposit, letter of credit, performance bond, pledge of governmental securities, or other collateral reasonably acceptable to the Board. Article VII. Special Development Standards Page 37 SECTION 8 TIMING OF SECURITY If this PD Ordinance or any of the Applicable Town Ordinances requires security for any obligation imposed by such ordinances, such security may be provided by the owner, developer, or contractor. Security shall not be required until construction of the secured obbl^ligation begins �jr,��p�Qmr�gCd SECTION 9 BOUNDARY SURVEY ro'��� � �� , ��� A boundary survey submitted with any preliminary plat shall be required to close and shall be certified by a licensed surveyor of the State of Texas. SECTION 10 FOUNDATION AND FRAMING Foundation work and first floor framing may be completed before fire protection improvements must be completed. SECTION 11 FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL The finished first floor of any building must be 18 inches above the highest point in any septic system drain field. SECTION 12 OVERSIZE COSTS The Town may require that public roadways, water lines, and sanitary/the nes be oversized. If such oversizing is required by the Town, the incremental cost (includn and construction) of the oversizing shall be paid by the Town as funds become availablee the improvements are completed in proportion to the respective increases in costs or as set forth in the Economic Development Agreement. SECTION 13 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT SITES Any platted lots may contain multiple separate structures, and each structure may contain multiple uses that are permitted by right as principal uses (together with all uses that are accessory to such principal uses). Any lot with multiple"principal use" structures may be designated by the owner(s) as a"unified development site"for purposes of complying with the provisions of the PD Ordinance and with the Applicable Town Ordinances. Any part of a unified development site (together with improvements located or to be constructed thereon) may, from time to time, be leased or sold (by metes and bounds or other legally sufficient description); and the part leased or sold may be developed, used and occupied without having to be platted, and the remainingpart of the unified development site may be developed,used, and occupied without having to be replatted. Regardless of ownership, the unified development site shall continue to be treated as one lot. A lot may be designated to the Town Planner as a unified development site at any time. Such designation must be in writing and must be signed by all owners of the lot; and such designation cannot be removed without the consent of all owners within the unified development site. SECTION 14 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS - LEVEL OF SERVICE The PD Districts were created based on a traffic impact analysis ("TIA") for the entire PD that was approved by the Board and that included "levels of service" (for roadways and intersections shown on the PD Concept Plan)that were deemed acceptable by the Board. Updates of the original traffic impact analysis will be required whenever any amendment to the Concept Plan is proposed that materially increases peak hour trip generation for the build out of the site beyond the peak hour trips estimated in the most recent traffic impact analysis and at the time of each PD site plan approval, Article VII. Special Development Standards Page 38 unless waived by the Town Engineer, for the purpose of determining on-site or abutting roadway improvements as set forth in Illustration 1 of Article III, Section 1. The TIA requirement is to be used for the sole purpose of determining the status of roadway improvements and site-related driveway access locations and size; it is not to be used to justify a lower density or additional off-site improvements. SECTION 15 UTILITY EASEMENTS Utility easements may be located as necessary to adequately serve development. Utility easements are not required to follow street alignments and may be located on or adjacent to lot lines. SECTION 16 ADA STANDARDS To the extent, if any,that the Applicable Town Ordinances are in conflict with the design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act or the Texas Architectural Barrier Statute, the standards of such acts shall control. SECTION 17 BRIDGE SURFACES Exposed surfaces of bridges may (at the option of the developer) be constructured of concrete, imbedded stone, cast stone, or other material approved by the Board. SECTION 18 FIRE LANES Fire lane width and radius must be approved by the Fire Marshall. SECTION 19 DEAD-END WATER LINES Dead-end water lines less than 600 feet shall be allowed. SECTION 20 WATER LINES Water lines within residential subdivisions may be installed within rights-of-way or easements. SECTION 21 DEPTH OF COVER The minimum depth of cover over water lines shall be 42 inches. SECTION 22 FIRE HYDRANT SPACING Maximum fire hydrant spacing shall be 1,000 feet,and all parts of a building must be within 500 feet of a fire hydrant. SECTION 23 FLOODPLAIN AND DRAINAGE RELOCATION Section 23.1 Floodplain and drainage ways may be relocated provided the relocated floodplain or relocated drainage way (i) is consistent with the applicable PD Concept Plan, (ii) complies with applicable state and federal regulations, and (iii) retains a natural character; (iv) no rise in the 100 year water surface upstream or downstream of the property; (v)no net loss in Valley storage; and(vi)discharge velocity shall be non-erosive. In addition it shall not result in (i) a rise in the 100 year surface upstream or downstream of the property,(ii)a net loss of Valley storage,or(iii)an erosive discharge velocity. Article VII. Special Development Standards Page 39 Section 23.2 Improved channels may be lined where there is erosive velocity. The erosive velocity shall be determined based on a site specific geotechnical investigation which determines the soil type in the channel. The linings may be natural stone or crushed stone with approved landscape cover. Channel lining shall not be concrete lined. SECTION 24 MANHOLES The maximum distance between manholes shall be 500 feet for all line sizes. Manhole steps shall not be required. SECTION 25 SANITARY SEWER LINES The minimum size for sanitary sewer lines shall be six inches in diameter. The maximum depth for sanitary sewer lines (from finished grade to the bottom of the line) shall be 20 feet. Visual inspection of sanitary sewer lines shall occur prior to acceptance and prior to the expiration of the maintenance bond. Article VII. Special Development Standards Page 40 I SNlf4 100'minimum setback 150'average setback OFFICE mob' OFFICE COMM. i/ Private access drive /� Private axes zof I ovation and size Location and sae b be 00'i determined. determined,3Dista , as per FIG.1 Ord Art OFFICE � OFFICE OFFICE %' OFFICE Final Road Location to be determined. Access over flood Private access drive plain)ovation Locatlon and and sae / OFFICE to be determined. to be determined. OFFICE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE � , :<. ; OFFICE GOLF l +/-1500' ZONE OF ELEVATION over flood 735 NSL MAXIMUM HEIGHT i ain k>adon Private access drive to be determined. Location and size b be r -� determined. I I SINGLE ----------------------- ---- — Minimum setback for the 75 FAMILY rrwamum building height assuming a 5:1 slope from the closest Dove Road I residential property line. I SINGLE FAMILY NOTE:All roads Internal to J — I the site are private. I LEGEND CONCEPTPLAN - - - Property Una Maverick Commercial Real Estate —— — Topography Date: August 3, 1998 --------- 5:1 Viewing Angle Setback Minimum Public Open Space(St Acres) Mvt'anum Private Open Space(47t Acres) Site Acreage(309.305 Acres) EXHIBIT "C" kF � 8 I 1 uoti F-� 11 --------- -- - -----------r Vim,- Y6 Y6 1051 EXHIBIT C. Town of Westlake Unified Development Code, as amended up to and including the date of this Ordinance, to be inserted; proposed amendments only attached: Article XI - Planned Development Regulations Article XII - Zoning Related Application (Sections 1.1 and 5.1 only) Article XIII - Subdivisions (Section 2.2 only) ARTICLE XI. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION 1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Article is to provide for the creation of planned development zoning district ("PD Districts"). PD Districts are intended to provide for the development of land as an integral unit for single or mixed use in accordance with a PD Concept Plan that may include uses, regulations and other requirements that vary from the Town's Unified Development Code (the "UDC") or from other ordinances, rules or regulations of the Town. PD Districts are intended to implement generally the goals and objectives of the Town's Comprehensive Plan, but may be accompanied by specific amendments to provisions of the Plan, the Open Space Plan or the Thoroughfare Plan. PD Districts are also intended to encourage flexible and creative planning, to ensure the compatibility of land uses, and to allow for the adjustment of changing demands to meet the current needs of the community by meeting one or more of the following purposes whenever possible: • to provide for a superior design of lots or buildings; • to provide for increased recreation and/or open space opportunities for public use; • to provide rural amenities or features that would be of special benefit to the property users or community; • to protect or preserve natural amenities and environmental assets such as trees, creeks, ponds, floodplain, slopes or hills and viewscapes; • to provide an appropriate balance between the intensity of development and the ability to provide adequate supporting public facilities and services. REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 1.2 NATURE OF DISTRICT AND MINIMUM STANDARDS Each PD District is intended to be a free-standing zoning district in which land uses and intensities of land use may be tailored to fit the physical features of the site and to achieve compatibility with existing and planned adjacent uses. In order to ensure that a PD District implements the policies of the Comprehensive Plan, and to further ensure that the PD District is in accordance with a comprehensive plan of zoning regulation, it is necessary to establish minimum standards for residential and non-residential uses proposed for the PD District that must be incorporated within an ordinance adopted by the Board (the "PD Ordinance"). A. Land Use. 1. Uses. Unless otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance, only those uses authorized by the Town's UDC are permitted in PD Districts, except that the following special uses may be authorized in accordance with the minimum standards set forth in this Subsection 1.2 following promulgation of specific dimensional, area, and design criteria governing such uses; a. retail shopping mall; b. destination resort; and C. mixed use town center. 2. Location. The location of all authorized uses shall be consistent with the PD Concept Plan and PD Site Plan. 3. Residential Density. Unless otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance on the basis of exceptional design and provision of enhanced open space, residential density shall not exceed two (2) units per gross acre REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 for single-family residential use and eighteen (18) units per gross acre for multi-family use. B. Open Space Standards. 1. Public and Private Open Space. Unless otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance, a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the gross land area within the entire PD District shall be devoted to open space, consistent with the open space requirements of the Town's Open Space Plan. Open space for PD Districts may be satisfied by either public or by a combination of public and private open space. Open space requirements specified in this subsection 1.2.B.1 are in addition to requirements for site landscaping and buffering. 2. Preservation of Natural Features. Unless otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance or PD Concept Plan; a. Floodplain areas shall be preserved and maintained as open space; and b. Significant stands of native trees and shrubs shall be preserved and protected from destruction or alteration. 3. Open Space Amenities. An applicant for a PD District may propose open space amenities in order to intensify the uses of the land within the district. 4. Open Space Allocation. Open space requirements shall be satisfied for each phase of multi-phased residential development. If open space is not to be provided proportionally among phases of development, the REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 applicant must execute a reservation of open space in a form that will assure the Town that such open space will be provided. The Town may require that all open space within the district must be provided prior to completion of development within the district. C. Other Minimum Development Standards. 1. Dimensional and Area Standards. Unless otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance, dimensional and area standards for uses shall be the most restrictive standards authorized by the Town's UDC for the same or similar uses. 2. Non-Residential Uses. Unless otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance, the following standards shall apply to all non-residential uses within a PD District: a. Height. No structure shall exceed the lower of three (3) stories or 45 feet above natural grade; however, the Board may allow up to five (5) stories adjacent to State Highway 114 if authorized by view analysis from residential areas. b. Drainage. Drainage features shall be integrated into the design of the development and shall be contained within ponds and streams with a natural appearance wherever possible. C. Floor Area Ratio: Shall not exceed .3; however, the Board may authorize higher intensities of use if supported by traffic impact analysis and site-specific open space analysis. R E D A L:15 3 602.1 202 97-00040 3. Materials. Unless otherwise provided by the PD Ordinance, UDC standards for building materials shall apply. 1.3 PLANS REQUIRED. There are three types of plans that may be required as part of the development process within a PD District. The general purpose and use of each plan is described as follows: A. PD Concept Plan. The PD Concept Plan is mandatory and is intended to be used as the first step in the PD development process. It establishes the most general guidelines for the PD District by identifying the land uses and intensities, thoroughfare locations, and open space boundaries (including public trail systems). It also illustrates the integration of these elements into a master plan for the whole PD District. The PD Concept Plan, as incorporated in the PD ordinance and together with the text of the ordinance, establishes the development standards for the PD district. The Board may waive PD Concept Plan requirements in the ordinance approving the PD and establish when the requirements shall be filed, with either the Development Plan or Site Plan. B. PD Development Plan. A PD Development Plan is optional and is intended to be used where necessary as the second step of the PD development process. A PD Development Plan may be used where the developer requests or the Board requires certain standards for the PD District to be specified after initial establishment of the PD District. A PD Development Plan includes more detailed information as to the specific land uses and their boundaries. The purposes of a PD Development Plan are to allow flexibility in the development process by deferring specification of all development standards at the time of PD District REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 creation and to enable developers to satisfy conditions imposed on creation of the District prior to submittal of a PD Site Plan. C. PD Site Plan. A PD Site Plan is mandatory and is the final step of the PD development process. The purposes of a PD Site Plan are to assure that the development of individual building lots, parcels, or tracts within the PD District are consistent with the approved Concept Plan and Development Plan, if any, and to assure that the standards applicable within the PD District are met for each such lot, parcel or tract. A PD Site Plan shall continue to be valid for a period of four years after it is approved by the Board; however, such period may be extended by the Board. A PD Site Plan shall terminate at the end of such four-year period (or extended period if approved by the Board) unless, within such period, a preliminary plat has been filed with the Town for all of the land covered by such PD Site Plan. If a PD Site Plan terminates, development of the land covered by the terminated plan cannot occur until a new PD Site Plan has been approved for the land as provided by this Article. 1.4 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE An applicant for a PD Development Plan or PD Site Plan is encouraged to request a pre- application conference with a Town official or the Town Planner prior to formal application. At the pre-application conference, the applicant should present a draft plan with as much detail as possible. Based on the information presented, the Town representative will provide initial comments concerning the merits of the proposed development and inform the applicant of any additional requirements for preparation of the formal zoning application. RE DAL:153602.1 20297-00040 1.5 COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED PLANS Except as otherwise provided by the subdivision provisions of the Town's Unified Development Code, no development shall begin and no building permit shall be issued for any land within a PD District until a PD Site Plan that is consistent with the PD Concept Plan and applicable PD Development Plan has been approved. Each PD District shall be developed, used, and maintained in compliance with the approved PD Site Plans for the district. Compliance with the PD Ordinance shall be construed as a condition precedent to granting of Certificates of Occupancy. SECTION 2. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PROCEDURES 2.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICT AND CONCEPT PLAN. A. Zoning Amendment. An application for the establishment of a PD District shall be made to the Commission. The application shall (1) be accompanied by a PD Concept Plan; (2) be accompanied by a list of proposed PD District development standards; (3) identify the Town's then-current zoning district which shall apply to the extent not otherwise provided by the PD Concept Plan or by the proposed PD District development standards; (4) be accompanied by a concept plan informational statement, and traffic impact analysis unless waived by the Board. Except to the extent provided by the PD Concept Plan and the PD Ordinance, development within the PD District shall be governed by all of the ordinances, rules, and regulations of the Town in effect at the time of such development (including the standards of the Town's zoning district so identified in the application). In the event of any conflict between (i) the PD Concept Plan and the REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 PD Ordinance and (ii) the then- current ordinances, rules, and regulations of the Town, the terms, provisions, and intent of the PD Concept Plan and PD Ordinance shall control. In addition, prior to action by the Commission on the establishment of the PD District, the applicant shall submit a traffic impact analysis. B. PD Concept Plan. A PD Concept Plan (or, at the applicant's option, a PD Development Plan) shall be processed simultaneously with the zoning amendment application, and if the zoning amendment application is approved, the PD Concept Plan (or PD Development Plan) shall be incorporated as part of the PD Ordinance. The graphic depictions contained on a PD Concept Plan shall be considered as regulatory standards. Unless otherwise provided in the PD ordinance, each PD Concept Plan shall be prepared on one or more standard sheets of sizes of 30" x 42" or 24" x 36" and at an engineering scale of 1"=100' or larger. If multiple sheets are required, an overall plan shall be submitted as well (which may be to any scale). Each PD Concept Plan shall graphically depict the following: 1. A diagram or drawing of the boundaries of the proposed PD District; 2. Proposed and existing land uses by category (including, if applicable, proposed and existing land uses by category for any sub-areas to be developed within the PD District); 3. Proposed density by type of residential uses, including the maximum numbers of dwelling units for residential uses other than single- family detached and lot sizes for single-family detached; R E D A L:15 3 602.1 2 02 97-00040 4. Proposed total floor area and floor area ratios by category of non- residential uses, together with residential view analysis, if any; 5. Proposed configuration of public and or private open space serving the development, showing the relationship to the Town's Open Space Plan, including trail system and access points to the trail system, estimated dimensions and approximate total square footage, and areas to be dedicated to the public or to a private maintenance organization; 6. Proposed and existing thoroughfares, boulevards and large streets. The requirements to show internal thoroughfares and streets may be waived by the Board in the ordinance approving the PD as long as a general plan for internal circulation as submitted with the next development plan or site plan application; 7. To the extent known for adjoining land, existing land uses (by zoning district), existing thoroughfares, and existing open space for such adjoining land; 8. Any amenities proposed for purposes of achieving density or intensity bonuses; 9. Drainage ways, creeks, and limits of the 100 year floodplain and floodway as shown on current FEMA mapping or the Town's master drainage plan, including approximate location and acreage, together with a general plan for accommodating flood waters and drainage; and 10. A general plan for circulation of traffic and pedestrians within and external to the development, including designated points of access. R EDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 C. Proposed PD Development Standards. Proposed PD District development standards shall be processed simultaneously with the zoning amendment application, and if the zoning amendment application is approved, such standards shall be incorporated as part of the PD Ordinance. Such proposed development standards may include (but shall not be limited to) uses; density; lot size; lot dimensions; setbacks; coverage; height; landscaping; lighting, fencing, parking and loading; signage; open space; drainage; and utility and street standards. Any graphic depictions used to illustrate such standards shall be considered as regulatory standards. D. Concept Plan Informational Statement. A PD Concept Plan shall be accompanied by an information statement containing the information set forth below. If the zoning amendment application is approved, the informational statement shall not be binding on the applicant or the land owner and shall not be considered part of the PD Concept Plan or the PD Ordinance. Informational statements shall be updated concurrently with any amendment to the PD Concept Plan and with each PD Development Plan. Each statement shall include the following: 1. A general statement setting forth how the proposed PD District will relate to the Town's Comprehensive Plan, 2. The total acreage within the proposed PD District; 3. If the development is to occur in phases, a conceptual phasing plan that identified the currently anticipated general sequence of development, REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 including the currently anticipated general sequence for installation of major capital improvements to serve the development; and 4. An aerial photograph with the boundaries of the PD Concept Plan clearly delineated. E. Traffic Lnpact Analysis. Prior to or simultaneous with submission of an application for the establishment of a PD District, the applicant shall submit to the Town's transportation engineer a traffic impact analysis for the proposed PD District. The analysis must be approved by the Board prior to (or concurrently with) the approval by the Board of the PD District. The traffic analysis shall not be considered part of the PD Concept Plan or the PD Ordinance but may be used to condition the density or intensity of uses or the timing of development within the District. The traffic impact analysis shall be updated with each PD Site Plan. F. Complete Application. No application for the establishment of a PD District shall be deemed to be filed with the Town until the Town Planner has determined that the PD Concept Plan is complete, that the proposed PD District development standards have been identified, a traffic impact analysis has been submitted, and that the informational statement is complete. Fifteen (15) copies of all such materials shall be submitted. G. Commission Recommendation. The Commission, after notice and public hearing in accordance with the Town's UDC procedures, shall formulate its recommendation with respect to establishment of a PD District. The recommendation of the Commission shall be forwarded to the Board for decision. REDA L:153602.1 20297-00040 H. Board Decision. Following receipt of the Commission's recommendation, the Board, after notice and public hearing in accordance with the Town's UDC procedures, shall conduct a public hearing and shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application for establishment of the PD District. I. Approval Criteria. Based upon the PD Concept Plan, the Commission, in making its recommendations to the Board, and the Board, in determining whether the PD District should be established, shall consider whether the following criteria have been met: 1. The plan of development is generally consistent with the Town's Comprehensive Plan(as such plan may be amended prior to or concurrently with approval of the PD District); _ 2. Proposed uses and the configuration of uses are compatible with existing and planned adjoining uses; 3. The general arrangement of streets conforms to the Town's Thoroughfare Plan(as such plan may be amended prior to or concurrently with approval of the PD District); 4. Proposed uses, development densities and intensities and development regulations are generally consistent with this Article; 5. The configuration of the proposed open space serving the development is generally consistent with the Town's Open Space Plan (as such plan may be amended prior to or concurrently with approval of the PD District); 6. The amenities proposed justify proposed densities or intensities; and REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 7. The proposed plan of development furthers the public health, safety and general welfare of the community; and 8. The traffic impact analysis demonstrates that the capacity of the proposed roadways shown on the proposed PD Concept Plan, together with any roadways within related PD Districts and the supporting roadway network, are adequate to accommodate the traffic expected to be generated by the uses, densities and intensities of use shown on the PD Concept Plan and authorized in the PD Ordinance. J. Conditions. The Commission may recommend, and the board may require, such conditions to the establishment of a PD District and to the approval of a PD Concept Plan as are reasonably necessary to assure that the purposes of the District and the approval criteria for the PD Concept Plan are met. Such conditions may include the requirement of a PD Development Plan. K. Adopting Ordinance. The PD Ordinance shall include the PD Concept Plan as an exhibit to the ordinance and shall include the following: 1. A statement of the purpose and intent of the PD District; 2. A metes and bounds description of the land within the PD District; 3. A list of the specific land uses permitted within the PD District, together with a description of the sub-areas, if any, in which such uses are allowed; 4. The maximum density or intensity of each permitted land use; 5. A list of all the PD District development standards, together with necessary graphic illustrations; R E D A L:15 3602.1 20297-00040 6. Identification of the Town's then-current zoning district standards that shall apply to the extent not otherwise provided by the PD Concept Plan or PD Ordinance; 7. Identification of the development standards, if any (whether in the PD Ordinance or in the then-existing ordinances, rules, or regulations of the Town), that may be deferred for specification until approval of a PD Development Plan or specific plan or that may be varied by the Board as part of the approval process for a PD Site Plan; 8. Unless otherwise identified on the PD Concept Plan, the general location and size of open space serving the development, including any proposed dedication of open space to the public or to a maintenance organization; 9. Provisions governing amenities, if any, to justify densities or intensities; and 10. Such additional conditions as are established by the Board to assure that the PD District and PD Concept Plan are consistent with the purposes of the District and the approval criteria for the Concept Plan. 2.2 DEVELOPMENT PLANS. If the Board requires as a condition of establishing the PD District and approving a PD Concept Plan that PD Development Plans be submitted prior to submittal of a PD Site Plan, a PD Development Plan may be prepared and submitted for the entire development at one time or for individual phases of development. Each plan shall be submitted in fifteen (15) copies to the Town Secretary. Each PD Development Plan shall be accompanied by (i) a development plan REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 informational statement and (ii) a preliminary drainage study for the area covered by the proposed plan. If deemed necessary by the Town's Transportation Engineer or Town Planner, the applicant for a PD Development Plan shall also submit an updated traffic impact analysis prior to Commission action. A. Submittal Requirements for PD Development Plans 1. Approximations of the following: site boundaries and dimensions, lot lines, site acreage and square footage, and distances to the nearest cross streets; 2. Location maps, north arrow, title block and site data summary table; 3. Existing land uses and zoning classifications on adjacent properties; 4. Any features omitted from the PD Concept Plan upon Board authorization; and 5. Such additional features as are determined necessary to assure compliance with conditions established by the Board to be satisfied by the Development Plan. B. PD Development Standards. Development standards that were not specified in the PD Ordinance, as authorized by the Board, shall be submitted and approved as an amendment to the PD Ordinance and incorporated therein, in conjunction with approval of the PD Development Plan. C. Development Plan Informational Statement. Each PD development Plan shall be accompanied by an information statement containing the information hereinafter set forth. The informational statement shall not be binding on the applicant or the land owner and shall not be considered part of the PD REDA L:153602.1 20297-00040 Development Plan or PD Ordinance. Informational statements shall be updated concurrently with any amendment to a PD Development Plan and with each PD Site Plan. Each informational statement shall include the following: 1. Name and address of landowner and date of preparation of the PD Development Plan; 2. Name and address of architect, landscape architect, planner, engineer, surveyor, or other persons involved in the preparation of the PD Development Plan; 3. A table listing the specific permitted uses proposed for the property, and, if appropriate, the boundaries of the different land uses and the boundary dimensions; 4. Development standards for each proposed land use, as follows: a. Minimum lot area; b. Minimum lot width and depth; C. Minimum front, side, and rear yard areas; d. Maximum height of building; and e. Maximum building coverage. 5. A list of the development standards, if any (whether in the PD Ordinance or in the then-existing ordinances, rules, or regulations of the Town that apply to development with the PD District), for which the applicant is seeking amendment by the Board as part of the PD Development Plan approval process; R E D A L:15 3 602.1 20297-00040 6. If Board approval of any height increase is being requested, a view analysis of the impact of such requested variance on adjacent residential areas of the Town; 7. Preliminary and approximate building locations and building footprints; 8. Preliminary elevations and perspectives to show the relationship of building heights to surrounding topography; 9. Location of parking areas and structures for multi-family and non- residential uses, including areas for off-street parking; 10. A detailed description of how open space serving the development will be satisfied for the phase of development represented by the PD Development Plan, including any proposed dedications of open space to the public or to a private maintenance organization; 11. If the PD Development Plan is a phase of the project (as described in the applicant's original informational statement submitted with the PD Concept Plan), depiction of the area subject to the development in relation to the then-current phasing plan, together with any updates of the then- current phasing plan that were submitted as part of the applicant's original informational statement; 12. Preliminary tree survey; 13. A list detailing each condition imposed by the PD Ordinance that is to be satisfied through approval of the PD Development Plan; and REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 14. A list identifying each proposed addition or amendment to the PD Ordinance. D. Preliminary Drainage Study. Each PD Development Plan shall be accompanied by a preliminary drainage study for the area covered by the study. The study shall be prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Texas and experience in the study of drainage issues. The preliminary drainage study shall (i) contain a topographical map of the area proposed for development to a scale not smaller than 1 inch = 200 feet; (ii) generally describe how the proposed development will comply with the drainage design policies set forth below; (iii) include all information deemed necessary by the preparing engineer to support his or her determination that the proposed development will comply with the drainage design policies; and (iv) include all information reasonably requested by the Town Engineer to support his or her review of the preliminary drainage study. The purposes of the drainage design policies are to prevent flooding of adjacent properties owned by third parties and to regulate water surface elevations and peak discharges. Development within the PD District shall not produce any increase in the water surface elevation (either upstream or downstream) due to a 5-year, 10-year, 50 year, or 100-year storm. If the discharge from the area proposed for development would increase the water surface elevation above predevelopment conditions on any property owned by third parties due to any such storms, then such peak discharge must be regulated to the extent necessary to eliminate the increased water surface elevation. The regulation of discharges to eliminate such increases may be achieved using either on-site or off-site stormwater REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 management facilities (such as detention areas, retention areas, and infiltration and sedimentation ponds). E. Updated Traffic Impact Analysis. If deemed necessary by the Town's transportation engineer, the applicant for a proposed PD Development Plan shall submit an updated traffic impact analysis prior to action by the Commission. The purpose of the updated analysis is to determine whether the traffic estimated to be generated by the development shown on the proposed PD Development Plan will necessitate specific on-site or adjacent traffic improvements (e.g., turn lanes, stacking lanes, signalization, etc.) and to determine whether conditions attached to the Concept Plan based on the original traffic impact analysis have been met. F. Commission Recommendation. The Commission, after notice and public hearing in accordance with the Town's UDC procedures, shall recommend to the Board whether to approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove each PD Development Plan, together with each proposed amendment to the PD Ordinance. G. Board Decision. Upon receipt of the Commission's recommendation, the Board, after notice and public hearing in accordance with the Town's UDC procedures, shall approve, approve with conditions, or disapprove each PD Development Plan and each proposed addition or amendment to the PD Ordinance. H. Approval Criteria. The Commission, in making its recommendation to the Board, and the Board, in acting upon each PD Development Plan and proposed addition or amendment to the PD Ordinance, shall determine whether the proposed PD Development Plan and ordinance addition or amendment meets the following criteria; REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 1. The plan generally is consistent with the approved PD Concept Plan (including open space, trails, and thoroughfares); 2. The plan generally is consistent with the development standards set forth in the PD Ordinance; 3. The plan satisfies any conditions established by the Board in the PD Ordinance relating to Development Plan approval; 4. The plan is generally consistent with the standards and conditions of the UDC and of other ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town (to the extent that such standards and conditions are applicable to development within the PD District); 5. The traffic estimated to be generated by the plan is generally consistent with the original Board approved traffic impact analysis and any conditions to be satisfied at the time of the Development Plan approval have been met; 6. The plan includes the necessary on-site or adjacent traffic improvements to accommodate traffic generated by the plan (e.g., turn lanes, stacking lanes, signalization, etc.); and 7. The preliminary drainage study for the plan indicates that the proposed development can be achieved without increasing the upstream or downstream water surface elevation on property owned by third parties and that detention and drainage areas can be improved in a natural manner. REDAL:153602.1 20247-00040 I. Conditions. The Commission may recommend, and the Board may require, such conditions to the approval of a PD Development Plan as are reasonably necessary to assure that the approval criteria are met. J. Approving Ordinance. The Development Plan shall be incorporated within an ordinance amending the PD Ordinance and the Concept Plan. The amending ordinance shall set forth all standards necessary for development of the land subject tot he Development Plan that were not included in the PD Ordinance. The amending ordinance also shall repeal or amend any conditions that were attached to the PD Ordinance that have been satisfied as a result of approving the Development Plan and associated amendments. 2.3 PD SITE PLANS A. Delegation to Commission. The Commission hereby is delegated the authority to approve, conditionally approve, or deny PD Site Plans and all amendments thereto, subject to appeal to the Board. Any requests for variances shall be decided by the Board upon recommendation of the Commission. B. Submittal Requirements. The following requirements apply to each application for PD Site Plan approval: 1. Size. PD Site plans shall be prepared on one or more standard sheets of sizes of 30" x 42" or 24" x 36" and at an engineering scale of 1"=100' or larger. IF multiple sheets are required, an overall plan shall be submitted as well (which may be to any scale). PD Site Plans shall be prepared by a registered engineer, architect, or landscape architect. 2. General Information: REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 a. North Arrow; b. Total site acreage; C. Submission date; d. Scale (written and graphic); e. Vicinity map; f. Names, addresses, and telephone numbers of designer, engineer, developer, and owner; g. A boundary survey of the site with the location of proposed land uses; h. Adjacent subdivision names and property lines; and i. Adjacent land uses and structures. 3. Structures: a. Location, dimensions, and use of all existing facilities and proposed building sites; b. Setback and separation distances between building sites; C. Proposed construction type and facade materials for all multi-family and non-residential buildings (the Commission may require elevations and perspective drawings); d. Proposed density of each use; and e. Proposed location of screening along public roadways shown on the PD Concept Plan. 4. Streets and Sidewalks: a. Location and width of all rights-of-way and easements; REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 b. Location and dimensions of all pavement and curbing; C. Location and width of all sidewalks; d. Location and width of all ingress/egress points; e. Location and width of all medians and median breaks; and f. Location of any special traffic regulation facilities. 5. Off-Street Parking and Loading Areas: a. Number, location, and dimension of spaces; b. Type of surface material of parking facility; C. Dimension of aisles, driveways, maneuvering areas, and curb return radii; d. Distance between spaces and adjacent rights-of-way; e. Location of all existing and proposed fire lanes and hydrants; and f. Proposed lighting diagram. 6. Landscaping: a. Location and size of major tree groupings and existing hardwood trees of 6" caliper or greater, noting whether they are to be removed or retained; b. Location and size of proposed plant materials, including paving; C. Number and type of each landscape element; d. Number and type of all fencing or buffering; e. Height of all planters, sculptures, and decorative screens; REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 f. Location and type of trash receptacle screening; g. Location and type of lighting for streets, signage, and parking areas; and h. Location of visibility triangles where required. 7. Drainage: a. Direction of water flow; b. Quantity of on and off-site water generation; C. Topographic contours at a minimum of 5 foot intervals; d. Points of concentrated water discharge; e. Areas where special design and construction may be necessary due to slope or soil conditions; and f. Location and design of all water detention and drainage areas. 8. Preliminary Service Plan: a. A preliminary drainage plan of the area showing the size and location of each existing and proposed drainage way and retention or detention area; b. The proposed method of providing water and sewer service. C. If no Development Plan has been required and approved by the board, an updated traffic impact analysis as required by section 2.2.E. 9. A list of the development standards, if any (whether in the PD Ordinance or in the then-existing ordinances, rules, or regulations of the REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 Town that apply to development within the PD District), for which the applicant is seeking a variance by the Board as part of the PD Site Plan approval process; and 10. If Board approval of any height increase is being requested, the applicant shall prepare (at the request of the Town Planner) a view analysis of the impact of such requested variance on adjacent residential areas of the Town. C. Commission Decision. The Commission, after notice and public hearing in accordance with the Town's UDC procedure, shall approve, approve subject to conditions, or deny each PD Site plan. D. Approval Criteria. The Commission, in approving, conditionally approving, or denying a PD Site Plan, shall consider the following criteria: 1. The plan complies with the applicable PD Concept Plan or Development Plan, if any, and with the PD Ordinance, including expressly conditions attached to the Concept Plan, Development Plan or PD Ordinance. 2. The plan complies with the standards and conditions of the UDC and of other ordinances, rules and regulations of the Town (to the extent that such standards and conditions are applicable to development within the PD District); REDA L:153602.1 20297-00040 3. If no Development Plan was required and approved by the Board, the traffic estimated to be generated by the plan is generally consistent with the original, Board approved traffic impact analysis; 4. If no Development Plan was required and approved by the Board, the plan includes the necessary on-site or adjacent traffic improvements to accommodate traffic generated by the plan (e.g., turn lanes, stacking lanes, signalization, etc.); and 5. If no Development Plan was required and approved by the Board, the preliminary drainage study for the plan indicates that the proposed development can be achieved without increasing the upstream or downstream water surface elevation on property owned by third parties and that detention and drainage areas can be improved in a natural manner. 6. Landscaping for the Town Edge promotes continuity and unity consistent with the landscape plan for the development and encourages views to public open space and public landmarks. E. Conditions. The Commission, or the Board on appeal, may establish such conditions to the approval of a PD Site Plan as are reasonably necessary to assure that the approval criteria are met. F. Appeal from Commission Action. If the Commission approves a PD Site Plan with conditions or if it disapproves a PD Site Plan, the applicant may appeal the decision to the Board by filing a written request with the Town Secretary within ten (10) days after the Commission's decision. REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 G. Variances. If the applicant requests a variance from PD Ordinance standards or other ordinance requirements, the variance request will be forwarded to the Board with the Commission's recommendation for decision. 2.4 AMENDMENT OF PLANS. A. PD Concept Plans. PD Concept Plans (excluding informational statements) are considered part of the PD Ordinance. Except as otherwise provided in this Subsection 2A.A., any amendment to a PD Concept Plan shall be considered a zoning change, and the provisions of Chapter 211 of the Texas Local Government Code relating to notices, public hearings, and written protests for changes in zoning districts or regulations shall apply. If a PD District is established subject to approval of PD Development Plans, the provisions of this Subsection 2A.A. shall apply to such PD Development Plan. B. PD Site Plans. PD Site Plans are not considered part of a PD Ordinance. Except as otherwise provided in this Subsection 2A.B., any amendment to an approved PD Site Plan must be approved by the Commission. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, "minor modifications" to any PD Site Plan may be approved by the Town Planner. A "minor modification" to a PD Site Plan is defined as any modification that does not: 1. alter the basic relationship of proposed development to adjacent property; 2. change the uses permitted; 3. increase the maximum density, floor area, or height; REDAL:153602.1 20297-00040 4. decrease the amount of off-street parking, unless parking remains sufficient in number and conforms to ordinance requirements; or 5. reduce the minimum yards or setbacks. SECTION 3. EFFECT ON EXISTING PDS 3.1 SITE PLANS. For any PD District established under prior planned development regulations for which at least one site plan has been approved pursuant to such prior regulations, the provisions of this Article shall not apply, except that procedures related to approval of PD Site Plans pursuant to Subsection 2.3 shall apply to any application for PD Site Plan approval submitted more than thirty (30) days after the effective date of this Article. 3.2 DISTRICT AMENDMENTS. If an amendment is proposed after the effective date of this Article to any concept plan, development plan, site plan or planned development ordinance approved prior to such effective date under prior planned development regulations, the provisions of the Article shall apply to such proposed amendment. RE DAL:153602.1 20297-00040 ARTICLE XII. ZONING-RELATED APPLICATIONS (amended Sections 1.1 and 5.1) SECTION 1. GENERAL 1.1 Filing of an Application: A. Pre-application Conference. 1. An applicant for a change in zoning is encouraged to request a pre-application conference with a Town official or the Town Planner prior to formal application. 2. At the pre-application conference, the applicant should present a draft Concept Plan with as much detail as possible. 3. Based on the information presented, the Town representative will provide initial comments concerning the merits of the proposed development and inform the applicant of any additional requirements for preparation of the formal zoning application. B. Application Requirements. No application shall be reviewed which is not complete and accompanied by the payment of fees as established in this Code or other ordinances of the Town of Westlake. All applications shall be filed with the Town on forms available in the Town of Westlake offices. C. Timing. Applications for Rezoning and Plan Approvals shall be submitted at least one month prior to the first scheduled hearing date. Special Exception and Variance applications shall be submitted at least 2 weeks prior to the first scheduled hearing date. The Board may permit exceptions to the timing requirement by scheduling a earlier hearing date. In any case, applications shall be placed on a Board and/or Commission agendas no less than 60 days after the filing date. SECTION 5 AMENDMENTS TO APPROVED APPLICATIONS. 5.1 Processing Amendments. A. Amendments to all applications and approvals shall be processed in the same manner as the original application. However, the applicant shall submit a summary of all elements that are proposed to be changed along with the revised plans and application. b. Notwithstanding the above, the Town Planner may approve minor modifications in an approved Site Plan or PD Site Plan administratively, provided that they do not: 1. Alter the basic relationship of proposed development to adjacent property: 2. Change the uses permitted; 3. Increase the maximum density, floor area, or height; 4. Decrease the amount of off-street parking, unless parking remains sufficient in number and conforms to ordinance requirements; or 5. Reduce the minimum yards and setbacks. ARTICLE XIII (amended Section 2.2) 2.2 COORDINATION WITH PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS A. Land With Approved or Pending Application for Concept Plan or Development Plan. No application for a subdivision plat or development plat shall be approved on land for which there is an approved or pending application for a concept plan or development plan, unless the plat is consistent with the standards for planned developments contained in the Town of Westlake Unified Development Code. The terms of the planned development district ordinance and/or details of the concept plan shall control over the requirements of this Article XIII. If public improvement dedication or construction requirements for Open Space, public land, roadway facilities or other public improvements have been determined during the approval of a planned developmentdistrict ordinance, concept plan or development . :an, such determinations shall control future development within the planned development district and no additional studies, dedications or construction requirements shall be imposed pursuant to this Article XIII. A development plat subject to an approved concept plan or development plan shall be except from the requirements to show improvements pursuant to Section 2.8 E. 3. of this Article. B. Preliminary Subdivision Plat With Site Plan Approval. A preliminary subdivision plat shall be submitted with the application for approval of a site plan if the property has not already been subdivided in a manner to accommodate the development. REDAL:153313.2 99999-00001 EXHIBIT D. Town of Westlake Comprehensive Plan WESTLAKE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BOARD OF ALDERMEN CONSULTANTS Honorable Dale White, Mayor Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc.: Al Oien Rowland Jackson, ASLA Fred Held Emily Braht, ASLA Jerry Moore Lori Lazarine Howard Dudley J. Dennis Wilson & Associates: Sherry Dudley Dennis Wilson, AICP Carroll Huntress (Previous) PLANNING & ZONING Paul C. Isham, Town Attorney COMMISSION Decker, Jones, MacMackin McClane, Hall & Bates Scott Bradley, Chairman Stanford Hauptmann, Town Engineer B.J. Minyard Metroplex Engineering Randy Loftis Consultants, Inc. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Scott Bradley, Chairman Roland Arthur Ron Jordan Fred Held Alvin Oien Carroll Huntress Doug Kusel Pat Atkins 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL URBAN DESIGN UTILITIES TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY SERVICES LAND USE GOVERNMENTAL APPENDIX ILLUSTRATIONS (After Page ... ) 1 Location Map 11 Adjacent Land Use 2 Vegetation Map 12 Land Use Plan 3 Topography and Drainage Map 13 Conceptual Open Space Map 4 Soils Map 14 Major Blvd. Collector Diagram 5 Visual Analysis Map 15 Major Collector Diagram 6 Adjacent Thoroughfare Map 16 Divided Collector 7 Conceptual Thoroughfare Map 17 Undivided Collector 8 Conceptual Roadway Sections 18 Local Residential Street 9 Conceptual Roadway Sections 19 Gateway Intersections 10 Conceptual Roadway Sections 20 Major Property Holdings 3 INTRODUCTION 4 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN This Comprehensive Plan is simply a statement of where the Township of Westlake is in terms of services and development in 1992; and where it wants to go-its vision of the future. It is designed to help implement this overall vision of the community and to protect the health, safety and welfare of present and future residents and workers of Westlake. The Plan is intended to provide property owners with guidance in the developing of plans, and to provide the Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Aldermen guidance in the review of applications for zoning and development. It also sets out recommendations for other actions by the Township which will facilitate the realization of their vision. As the Township grows and develops, the guidelines in this Plan will be refined and altered. That is the normal planning process. The policies, however, should provide good counsel in making both the large and small decisions that will be necessary to guide the community over the next several years. ORGANIZATION OF THE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan translates the community's goals into a series of policy statements and plan maps. The goals and policies in italics were adopted by the Board of Aldermen on August 24, 1992. Each section of the Plan report includes a brief discussion of the existing condition (Background), followed by a discussion of the key issues (issues), then a series of goals are discussed which flow from discussions held with the Board of Aldermen and a workshop with the Advisory Committee (Goals and Objectives). Each goal is then followed by Policy statements. The Goals and Objectives statements are intended to convey the overall direction that property owners wish their community to move toward. Policy statements are intended as specific statements of the Board's policies relating to that particular issue area. OVERVIEW OF THE PLAN 5 "The Vision for Westlake is to create a community which builds on its existing high quality office park development and rural residential character, and which maintains and enhances the natural features of the community." This Vision of the Town was developed from a workshop held with the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Committee as representing the fundamental objective of the community." It is reflected in some key objectives of the Plan: a. Maintain a rural character throughout the township. b. Ensure a stewardship of the natural features of the land. C. Protect the quality and character of existing development. d. Provide services and amenities for both resident and employee populations that come to Westlake. e. Ensure that new development is in the best long term interests of those who choose to live and work in the community. The Town of Westlake is located within an urbanizing area between the DFW and Alliance Airports. It has chosen to break up the relatively uniform pattern of suburban development that has been taking place in the area; thereby providing needed contrast in the land use and open space pattern, and contributing to diversity within the region. Momentum for this rural unique character has been established by existing residential areas, and the development of Solana-a comprehensively planned office park. These developments have demonstrated an alternative to typical suburban development through quality site design, building form and environmental sensitivity. ENVIRONMENT 6 ILLUSTRATION 1 (GRAPHICS) 7 VEGETATION Background Scattered individual tree specimens on gently sloping grass meadows is the primary vegetative character of Westlake as shown in Illustration 2. Characteristic of most active ranches, existing dense stands of tree cover were cut and thinned out between property and fence lines to promote prairie grass growth. Only two (2) small parcels of land to the east and west contain dense tree stands outside the Circle T Ranch property. Groves of "second generation trees" line some existing water bodies such as ponds, stock tanks and streams. Generally the area is defined as Blackland Prairie with scattered Mesquite, Red Oaks, Live Oaks, Post Oaks, Hackberry, American Elm, Cedar Elm, Hawthorne, Honey Locust, Chittamwood, Pecan, Bur Oak and Chinkapin Oak. Issues Existing trees help to create an attractive rural character. However, the development process often greatly alters the topography and removes vegetation in order to provide a clean site for construction. It is important that site plans and building designs reflect the site's vegetation and topography, wheneverosp sible. Goals and Objectives 1. Preserve major hardwood trees, if feasible, as an important natural resource in promoting and maintaining a rural character for Westlake. 8 ILLUSTRATION 2 (GRAPHICS) 9 Policies a. Ensure that buildings are designed and sited, and that parking is laid out, to avoid specimen trees as well as dense thickets of mature stands of trees, whenever }possible. b. Ensure that construction techniques are used that avoid damage to existing trees. C. Preserve major hardwood trees with a caliper of 6 inches or greater, and all trees with a caliper of 2 inches or greater when located in dense thickets, whenever possible. d. Utility corridors should occur along proposed roadways. Storm drainage and sanitary sewer lines, via easements, should be carefully located in the flood plain to preserve natural vegetation. 2. Ensure that landscaping reinforces the rural character. Policies a. Require landscape and irrigation plans for all non-single family development. b. Where landscaping is proposed, hardy native species should be included in the design. C. Create landscaped buffers along all Collector roadways to screen views of development. d. Create landscape buffers between major freeways and development. e. Ensure that large surface parking areas are broken up with trees and vegetation. f. Ensure that distant view corridors to the north/northeast are preserved whenever possible. 10 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE Background The topography of existing conditions is broken into the following percent gradients for analysis: Oto3% 3to5% 5 to 10% 10 to 25% 25 to steeper slopes A 3% slope represents three feet (3') of vertical elevation change in one hundred feet (100') of horizontal distance. Most of Westlake falls within the 0-5% slope range or generally flat, as seen in Illustration 3. This land primarily occurs along U.S. Highway 377 to the west and along State Highway 114 to the north. Land begins to steepen towards south Westlake, particularly around six (6) knolls or hilltops. The gradients around some of these key land features steepen to twenty-five (25%) and thirty (30%) percent. Elevation changes across the town generally fall from hilltops and ridges of 750 feet (MSL) along the south down to 600 feet elevation flood plains in the north. Three (3) drainage ways generally flowing from south to north intersect State Highway 114 and flow into the Town of Trophy Club. The flood plain varies in width from 200 to 1400 feet and has several ponds and lakes created for water conservation and ranch management purposes. 11 ILLUSTRATION 3 (Graphics) 12 Issues Westlake has a very attractive rolling topography with, in some areas, extreme slopes. The topography creates opportunities for backdrops to development, exciting views and important elements of a comprehensive open space plan. Goals and Objectives 1. Preserve natural topography and drainage patterns, wheneverosp sible. Policies a. Minimize the size of building footprints, which can produce large unnatural flat building pads. Quality site planning is required to orient long sides of buildings parallel with existing contours to reduce cut and fill. Long rectangular buildings placed perpendicular to existing contours are acceptable only to avoid blocking important views. b. For the most part, roadway alignments should parallel existing contours to reduce grading and unnatural land forms. Roads should stay off of steep gradients of the existing knolls and ridges in order to minimize walls and expensive engineering procedures. C. In order to achieve certain important urban design objectives, such as creating buffering along Hwy 114, topography may be altered significantly. 2. Land uses and densities should respond to the existing topography, thereby minimizing substantial topographical changes. Policies a. Building height for commercial structures should be controlled in order to preserve views to and from prominent hills to the extent possible. b. Construction on the steeper slopes should be properly controlled to reduce erosion and destruction of the slopes. C. Land uses with large floor plates and large parking requirements, such as commercial, should be located in the flatter lower elevations near Highways 114 and 377. 13 3. Drainage should be detained or retained on site to avoid increased runoff into the three flood plains that flow to Trophy Club. Regional coordination of storm water drainage should occur. Policies a. All drainage plans should be designed to control the 100 year flood conditions. b. All commercial projects and residential subdivisions of 5 lots or more should be required to submit drainage studies that demonstrate no substantial impact on adjacent properties. C. Where storm water management improvements are required, they should be incorporated into existing lakes, or they should be designed in as small an area as possible. The ratio of a storm water basin's area to volume should be minimized, unless creating a lake feature. d. Retention basins should be used where basins are required. e. The basins should have a shape, depth and side slope gradient that resembles natural ponds. If several basins are required, they should vary in size and shape, and be separated by tree groves and vegetation. Landscape materials should enhance wild life habitat where possible. f. Drainage plans of individual developments should be coordinated with adjoining properties as well as the whole Town to provide for coordinated open space and a greenbelt of lakes and basins. SOILS Background The "Soil Survey of Tarrant and Denton Counties" indicates that soils in Westlake are generally loamy fine sand layers formed in alkaline sediments. The soils are better than many areas of the Metroplex such as Las Colinas, but they are generally poor for septic tank usage. Issues 14 The Soil Map (illustration 4) classifies good, moderate and poor soils as they relate to building construction: Good - Silstid loamy fine sand. Moderate - Konsil, Justin, Gasil, Callisburg fine sandy loam. Poor - Pulexas, Crosstell fine sandy loam and Burleson Clay. This soil classification is for soil types to an approximate depth of 5 to 6 feet. Goals and Objectives 1. Generally relate land uses, densities and construction methods and techniques to soil types. Policies a. All residences which are to be built on steep slopes and all commercial projects should be required to obtain a detailed geotechnical analysis report for their specific building site, and to show evidence of following its recommendations. 15 ILLUSTRATION 4 (GRAPHICS) 16 URBAN DESIGN 17 Background Reinforcing and preserving vistas to the Town's natural assets are important to maintaining the rural state of the existing site. The six (6) prominent knolls are strong visual elements as viewed from SH 114 and 377. They become less pronounced from the northerly views of higher elevations to the south. From these hill tops, one has strong distant and panoramic views to the northwest and northeast. The IBM corporate offices are an example of good site planning to reduce one's awareness of development. However, large amounts of soil were moved in order to achieve some of the screening effects. Strong, positive views of the Solana/I BM Entry at Hwy 114 sets a Town precedent for other potential "doors into the Town." Solana has established landscaped setbacks of an average of 200 feet from the Freeway right-of-way, 100 feet from Kirkwood Blvd. and 85 feet from Sam School Rd. Issues Westlake is a unique area in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. It has a very attractive rolling topography, distinctive drainage patterns and stands of major hardwood trees as shown in Illustration 5. This is probably like much of the Dallas/Fort Worth area before insensitive development "had its way" with the land. There is no reason why development cannot be accommodated while preserving the area's special rural character and key prominent features in the Township. Westlake's uniqueness can be enhanced by assuring that development is consistent with the vision for Westlake. 18 ILLUSTRATION 5 (Graphics) 19 Goals and Objectives 1. Avoid all forms of visual pollution. Policies a. Utilize traffic sign and signal hardware that is non-obtrusive. b. Avoid commercial signage that seeks to gain attention. C. Utilities should be placed underground. 2. Ensure that attractive views which enhance the rural character of Westlake are maintained and taken advantage of. Policies a. Buildings and roadways should be located to preserve view to prominent knolls, and from high elevations down to the valleys, whenever possible. b. Buildings should be set back from freeway frontage roads, and Major and Minor Collectors to provide for a landscape buffer and reinforce the rural feeling. C. Disturbance of the natural topography and vegetation on any lots and buffer areas should be kept to a minimum, whenever possible. d. Each corporate campus and residential development should be master planned to preserve open space, vegetation and view corridors, whenever possible. 3. Building sites and structures should be laid out so that the area maintains its natural character, as much as possible. Policies 20 a. Building heights in excess of 2-2 1/z stories should only be allowed by Planned-Development District typically adjacent to Hwys 377, 170 and 114. Commercial buildings up to 7 stories may be approved as part of a comprehensive site plan, taking into account other development in the area, the preservation of view corridors, and the maintenance of the rural character of the Township. b. Building envelopes should be limited and located on that portion of the site most suitable for development. The maximum amount of natural slope and vegetation should be preserved, wheneverosp sible. C. Building envelopes should not include tops of ridges, wetlands, buffer areas, flood plains and slopes in excess of 25% grade. d. Trees on ridge lines should be preserved if possible. 4. Public works projects such as roads and bridges should be sensitively designed and constructed to contribute to Westlake's overall character. 5. Lighting should not detract from the rural character of Westlake. Policies a. On-site lighting should occur only where specific safety conditions warrant, or where it will reinforce the rural character of development. b. Street lighting standards should only be located primarily at intersections. Otherwise, it should be approved as part of a comprehensive development plan. 21 W E-� � N rr H r� Background There is one fully established, legislatively created, Municipal Utility District (MUD) in Westlake -- the Lake Turner Municipal Utility District No. 1. It covers a portion of the Circle T property adjacent to Highways 114 and 170, as well as the Lyda Bunker Hunt Trust Property, and is not furnishing any service at this time. The Solana development has been annexed into the Trophy Club Municipal Utility District No. 1, and receives sewer and water from that entity. Many residences in Westlake are on wells and septic tanks, others receive water from the City of Keller. Issues MUDs can create an uneven tax burden on properties. Legislation creating the Lake Turner MUD provides for the district to expand its taxing boundaries without the Township's approval. In some instances in the State, MUDs have been loaded with bond indebtedness in the early years resulting in an unexpected and unanticipated tax burden on properties in later years, after properties were subdivided, developed and sold. Utilities which are insensitively placed and constructed can ruin scenic views. Goals and Objectives 1. Westlake should control all utilities. It should also encourage development of utilities based upon regional demands and considerations. This would ensure consistency of cost and supply, and efficiency in provision. 2. Avoid visual pollution created by above ground utilities. Policies a. New development should be responsible for construction and installation of all new utilities according to the Township's or utility company's approved specifications, including off-site utilities made necessary by such development. Westlake should also encourage participation in the construction and installation of such new facilities. 23 b. A new development should be required to locate utilities below grade providing that the utility company will pay for the placement underground. C. All below grade utilities should seek to follow natural drainage areas, existing easements and road rights-of-way wherever possible. 24 TRANSPORTATION 25 Background Roadways in Westlake are generally constructed and maintained by Tarrant County. The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCT-COG)has run a trip generation model for Tarrant County. The model reflects the Thoroughfare Plan for Westlake as indicated in this chapter. Running of the model indicated that anticipated traffic volumes in and around the Town will be adequately accommodated by the proposed Thoroughfare Plan. The adjacent municipalities of Keller, Roanoke and Southlake are in the process of updating their Thoroughfare Plans, as shown by Illustration 6. Plans for the key thoroughfares which penetrate Westlake include: Henrietta Creek Rd. 80-120'ROW 4 lane undivided Trophy Lake Dr. 90'ROW 4 lane divided Trophy Club Dr. 90'ROW 4 lane divided Dove Rd. 84'ROW --- Sam School Rd. 84'ROW --- Precinct Line/FM1938 95'ROW 6 lane undivided Pearson Lane 70'ROW 4 lane undivided In addition, Bourland Rd. is expected to connect with a major Fort Worth thoroughfare crossing Hwy 377 at the southwest corner of Westlake. This roadway will serve anticipated light industrial development in both Fort Worth and Keller. In Westlake south of Hwy 114, the newly constructed Kirkwood Boulevard is a lane divided thoroughfare terminating adjacent to the corporate campus area located between Kirkwood Blvd. and Precinct Line Road. It has a varying right-of-way, but averages about 170 feet in width with an additional landscaped setback of 100 feet. Issues A typical grid of thoroughfares through Westlake would not work well with the Town's topography, thus requiring excessive manipulation of the land. 26 Provide for ease of circulation for regional traffic through Westlake, where necessary; but avoid "cut-through" traffic which would unnecessarily congest Westlake roads. Maintain a rural atmosphere in Westlake when development is in place. Goals and Objectives 1. Develop a circulation pattern that: a. minimizes thru-traffic, b. internalizes circulation of all but major roadways, C. creates winding and scenic roadways, and d. follows existing topographic contours. 2. Develop thoroughfare standards which will result in minimal congestion on all Westlake roads, and preserve a rural character. Policies a. The arrangement, character, extent, width and location of all streets should be in conformity with the Township's Thoroughfare Plan, and should be considered in their relation to existing and planned streets, topographical conditions, scenic views and their appropriate relation to the land uses proposed to be served by such streets. b. All freeway service roads and Collectors should have limited access points to ease the flow of traffic. C. All freeway service roads and Collectors should have a landscaped buffer to reinforce the rural character. d. Roadways in easements or dedicated rights-of-way should be configured in the following manner (Illustrations 8, 9 and 10): 27 3. Developers should install to the Town's approved standards roadways in the development. Policies a. The developer should construct and pay for all roadways made necessary by its development, and provide a two year maintenance bond. 28 Major Blvd. Collector 6 lane divided 165'ROWAvg. Major Collector 6 lane divided 130'ROW Collectors 4 lane divided 106'ROW 4 lane undivided 86'ROW Local Rural Residential 2 lane undivided 60'ROW Local Suburban Resid. 2 lane undivided 50'ROW e. Roadways should have no curb and gutter, but rather use landscaped swales for surface drainage. If curbing is required for storm water management, then Belgian block or equivalent material should be used. 29 ILLUSTRATION 6 (GRAPHICS) 30 ILLUSTRATION 7 (GRAPHICS) 31 ILLUSTRATION 8 (GRAPHICS) 32 ILLUSTRATION 9 (GRAPHICS) 33 ILLUSTRATION 10 (GRAPHICS) 34 COMMUNITY SERVICES 35 Background Currently, all services are contracted by Westlake. Fire, ambulance and emergency police services are provided by Trophy Club. This arrangement allows Westlake to participate in the 911 service. In addition, the Tarrant County sheriff provides regular police patrols. Issues As Westlake grows, there will be increasing demand to provide its own services for citizens and businesses. Current service providers have as their highest priority, their own population; thus, important services such as medical, fire and police protection can be slow. In addition, the fact that the base for these services is located outside the boundaries of the Town ensures a built-in delay in response time. A broad range of services are necessary to support increasing resident and employee populations. These include health, recreation, day care, and retail services. Goals and Objectives 1. Continue to contract services in the near term; but as the town grows, there may be a need to augment or assume the supply of services. 2. Ensure a development pattern that will minimize the need for the Town to provide its own services. 3. As Westlake grows, ensure that health, social and service needs of both residents and employees are met. Policies a. Developers of commercial properties should provide services to meet the needs of their employees, including health and fitness facilities, day care, recreation centers and trails for hiking, biking and jogging. These services may be provided on site or shared with other employers in close proximity. b. Retail centers should be provided in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan which focus on services for residents and employees in the area. 36 LAND USE 37 Background The Zoning Ordinance in Westlake currently includes six districts Low Density Residential, High Density Residential, Local Retail, Planned Office Park, Planned Office Park - Hotel, and Industrial Planned Development District However, land in Westlake is currently zoned with only three of these districts Low Density Residential, Planned Office Park, and Planned Office Park-Hotel. The residential district requires minimum 10 acre lots. The Planned Office Park District is limited to 10% coverage, with a height cap of 700' MSL (mean sea level) which will allow between 0 and 8 stories. It also contains a minimum 500 foot setback and a minimum 150 acre lot size. These and other development standards can be modified by Planned Development District Ordinance approved by the Town's Board of Aldermen. The Planned Development District is for large land areas and may include specific development standards and criteria addressing area site conditions. As a general rule, the Town requires that 5% of land to be subdivided is dedicated for public use such as parks and playgrounds for all zoning districts except a PD. Issues The zoning categories applied in the Township are very restrictive and do not provide for a broad range of land uses. The type of land uses developed in Westlake will have an impact on the level of support service that the Township will need to provide, on the ability to preserve the natural features of the land, and on traffic and circulation. 38 ILLUSTRATION 11 (GRAPHICS) 39 A major concern to the community is the quality of development that can occur with straight zoning. There is a desire to ensure that new development is at least as high quality as the Solana office park. Goals and Objectives 1. Create zoning and development standards that will have flexibility to ensure quality development and retain and enhance the rural atmosphere of the community. Policies a. Land uses and their location should whenever possible - require a minimal alteration of topography; and - take advantage of the topography and vegetation of the Township, in order to provide attractive views and reinforce the rural character of the community. b. Properties located northwest of Highway 170 should have less restrictive minimum lots sizes and building setbacks. C. As an incentive for the provision and maintenance of roadways, utilities and open space, dedications and easements should be secured by the Township, and site densities should be calculated on the gross site area. d. Provide for Planned Development Districts whereby a zoning district may be applied for and utilized in order to allow greater flexibility in land use, density and other regulations, and to more closely reflect special conditions of development sites. Commercial Office: 2. Because of the proximity of the area to the Alliance and DFW Airports and the existing corporate office development in the Township, the Town should build on the corporate office park concept by providing an adequate supply of land in Westlake for this type of development. 40 Residential: 3. Allow residential development that will maintain a rural character Policies a. Residential subdivisions and buildings should be carefully designed in order to work with the rolling, and in some places steep, topography. This may require innovative solutions to approach the maximum allowable densities. b. Residences should not face directly on Collector or larger roadways. C. Creation of extensive lawn areas should be discouraged, and a more natural landscape, with wildflowers and trees, should be encouraged. d. Clustering of residential lots to preserve open space and enhance rural character should be permitted upon the submission of an acceptable development plan including the location of lots and building envelopes, and an open space management plan. e. A development plan should be submitted for aft areas with a residential density in excess of I unit(acre. Such areas should be a minimum of 25 acres. f. Residential development with clustered housing of 3-5 units per acre, or higher density multi-family units, may be allowed if considered an integral part of a detailed comprehensively planned development, provided that other provisions of this Plan are met. Retail: 4. Retail should serve local residents and businesses. Retail areas may include hotel and office uses. Regional retail centers should be avoided. Industrial: 5. Light industrial use, if allowed, should be limited to the western portion of the township. 41 Institutional: 6. Institutional uses such as hospitals, schools and churches should be allowed. Parks and Open Space: 7. An open space system should be created for the township in order to preserve recreational and aesthetic linkages throughout the community, as shown in Illustration 13. Policies a. Open space corridors should be provided primarily along flood plain and drainage areas. Some should be required in an east/west direction to connect the natural open space corridors together, forming a comprehensive system. b. All project master plans and subdivisions should conform to the Open Space Plan. C. Flood plains and land with slopes in excess of 25% should constitute the majority of the open space system. 8. Parks should be located with easy access from any households in each Moderate Density Residential area, and should be a minimum of 10 acres in size. 9. Land uses allowed in parks and open spaces should include a broad range of activities including hiking, jogging, horseback riding, golf, tennis and other court sports. However, some uses may be restricted in certain areas for the safety and convenience of the public. Hike and Bike Section 10. A Park and Open Space Management Plan, including lakes, should be prepared to ensure proper maintenance and security. It should also address water quality in the lakes. 42 Signage: 11. Minimize the impact of signage. Policies a. All signs in Westlake should be on-site business identification or for public information. No off-site product or service advertising should be allowed. b. Temporary on-site signs should be allowed under strict control. 43 ILLUSTRATION 12 (GRAPHICS) 44 ILLUSTRATION 13 (GRAPHICS) 45 GOVERNMENTAL 46 Background Currently, Westlake has no paid staff. All legal, engineering and planning work are contracted with consultants; and all police, emergency, and fire services are contracted with other agencies. There is no ad valorem tax in Westlake. The Town's principal income is from its portion of the State sales tax and from utility franchise taxes. Issues The cost of creating municipal departments would be high for Westlake, especially since its entire area encompasses only some 4,000 acres. The Township will never be large enough to support a staff with a great depth of capabilities. The addition of paid staff could lead to the need to assess ad valorem taxes on properties within its boundaries. Certain land uses create a greater need for municipal services than other land uses, and cost more to serve in terms of police, fire and utilities. Goals and Objectives 1. Minimize the need for the Township to provide its own services and to add municipal staff. Policies a. All municipal improvements shall include a two year maintenance bond. b. The Township will contract with appropriate entities to build and maintain its infrastructure, until such time as it deems it necessary to create its own staff. 2. Utilize development standards, and encourage a development pattern that minimizes the need for ad valorem taxes. 3. As an incentive to quality development, maintain a low tax base to allow capitalization of improvements and maintenance. 47 4. Ensure that new development is in the best long term interests of those who choose to five and work in the community. 5. Encourage regional cooperation and cost participation for all off-site and infrastructure upgrading of water systems, sewer treatment facilities and flood plain control. 6. Consider Public Improvement Districts as a method of providing interim financing for water, sewer, roadways and open space development, as well as for long term maintenance of these items. 48 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE DATA: Planned Development ac. % Single Family Residential 1,835 ac. 45% Multifamily Residential 26 ac. 1% Local Retail 50 ac. 1% Office Park 1,455 ac. 36% Office/Light Industrial Park 351 ac. 9% Freeway Rights-of-Way (Hwys 114,170 & 377) 317 ac. 8% 4,034 ac. 100% Approximately 450 acres of land (11%) is in Flood Plain, which will comprise a majority of the Open Space System 49 APPENDIX 50 ILLUSTRATION 14 (GRAPHICS) 51 ILLUSTRATION 15 (GRAPHICS) 52 ILLUSTRATION 16 (GRAPHICS) 53 ILLUSTRATION 17 (GRAPHICS) 54 ILLUSTRATION 18 (GRAPHICS) 55 ILLUSTRATION 19 (GRAPHICS) 56 ILLUSTRATION 20 (GRAPHICS) 57 EXHIBIT E. Town of Westlake Thoroughfare Plan Thoroughfare Plan for The Town of Westlake A Component of The Comprehensive Plan Submitted to The Town of Westlake, Texas Submitted By Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Approved and Adopted by the Board of Aldermen on November 25, 1996 Amended by the Board of Aldermen REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Background Plan Purpose Inventory and Analysis Function of Thoroughfare Planning Thoroughfare Planning Process Existing Conditions in Westlake Thoroughfare Plans of Adjacent Cities Transportation System Policies Thoroughfare System Roadway Functional Classification System Design Standards Roadways Sidewalks REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 Town of Westlake Thoroughfare Plan INTRODUCTION Background In 1992, the Town of Westlake adopted a Thoroughfare Plan as a component of a Comprehensive Plan. This Thoroughfare Plan was composed of a set of Policies, a Conceptual Thoroughfare Map, and a set of Conceptual Roadway Sections. Since that time, an ordinance concerning driveway access and design has been approved and there is a need to update the functional classification designations of the roadway system to conform to current standard nomenclature and application to the driveway access and design ordinance. This plan serves as an update to the 1992 plan, and replaces it as the Town's official thoroughfare plan component of the Comprehensive Plan. Plan Purpose The purpose of the Thoroughfare Plan, as a component of the Comprehensive Plan, is to provide residents, employees and visitors to Westlake with convenient vehicular and pedestrian access roadway circulation. It is further intended to reinforce the rural and recreational character of the Town, minimize traffic congestion, and be environmentally sensitive in terms of reducing air pollution and storm water runoff. It is also intended to be compatible with the specific thoroughfare plans of adjacent cities and the general roadway system of the total urbanized area. This plan provides policies and standards that guide the Town's review and approval of subdivision plats. Detailed design and construction standards for roadways can be found in the Town's Engineering Standards. INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS Function of Thoroughfare Planning The function of the Thoroughfare Plan is to provide a guide for determining future roadway requirements for the Town. The Plan is developed to support the Town's land use plan by providing adequate capacity to move people, goods, and services efficiently. It will allow the Town to acquire needed right-of-way in advance of or as new development occurs. The plan should be flexible and should be reviewed on a regular basis to incorporate changes in local conditions. The plan is a guide that indicates roadway capacity needs in response to planned land uses in an area and serves as a basis for subdivision requirements. In developed sections of the Town, the Thoroughfare Plan provides guidance for upgrading and/or protecting the integrity and character of existing thoroughfares. REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 Thoroughfare Planning Process The process of developing a thoroughfare plan requires the consideration of elements that affect travel demands, movement and access requirements, and physical constraints to roadway construction. In addition, the plan should further community objectives for the character of Westlake. The first consideration in developing a thoroughfare plan is the Town's land use plan. The type of land uses that are existing or planned for an area help to decide the appropriate roadway capacity and access needs for that area. A densely developed commercial area will require higher capacity roadways and intersections than a low density residential area. The next consideration is balancing the movement and access functions of the thoroughfare system. Roadways serve two competing functions, the movement of traffic, and access to properties. This competition exists as ingress and egress maneuvers from local properties impede the movement of traffic on major roadways, and as high traffic volumes make turning movements into and out of driveways difficult. Structuring a thoroughfare plan such that these two competing functions occur on separate portions of the system is a primary goal of thoroughfare planning. Physical constraints to roadway construction such as drainage areas, topography, vegetation, and existing development are considered. Efforts are made to cross, or avoid these constraints in a logical manner that will minimize topographical changes and construction costs while maintaining mature stands of trees and efficient operations. In addition, it is important to lay out roadways that will open key views and vistas within the Town. Finally, community objectives for maintaining a rural character for the Town while accommodating development, help to further determine roadway patterns, access characteristics and the design of roadway corridors. Existing Conditions in Westlake The system of streets and highways in the Town of Westlake is generally comprised of rural asphalt roadways constructed by Tarrant and Denton Counties. The exceptions are (1) the sections of U.S. 3 77, S.H. 114 and S. H. 170 that have been upgraded to freeway standards and (2) the sections of Kirkwood Boulevard and Sam School Road constructed to improved standards in the Solana development. Thoroughfare Plans of Adjacent Cities In the interest of showing the relationship between the proposed Town of Westlake Thoroughfare Plan and the thoroughfare plans in the adjacent cities, information on the plans for the cities surrounding the Town has been obtained and is presented in Figure I (see p. 4). As shown, all thoroughfares that extend to the boundaries of the Town link directly to a similar roadway cross- section in an adjacent municipality. REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 2 LEGEND IP o N ■ ■■IN■■ Major Blvd. Arterial 186' R.O.W. (Avg.), 38'-38' Pavement ,. S HorQ Qom' �• •••••••••••••••• Major Arterial 130' R.O.W.. 38'-38' Pavement �Aweer vp• --—— -- Minor Arterial 108' R.O.W., 24'-24' Pavement ?p.A pk• �v Ice� Collector Undivided 90' R.O.W. , 48' Pavement g e4*00 w n o Not to Scale J 0. A 4 . Henrietta Creek Rd. �� v Cb klrktp 00 I"d 0,Roe A sok i .10 r Dove Rd. 8LU 84'R.O.W. cc 4CDI �O ¢ S a a r e cc 0 ' 0 zo ° o s3 _2 � � Om -Jo o o = F" D CC J 7 J J _ _ f• E ' .t N U W J CL J 'f FIGURE 1 THOROUGHFARES IN CITIES ADJACENT TO WESTLAKE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM POLICIES The following goals and policies have been developed to provide guidance and direction in the planning, design, implementation, maintenance and operation of a multi-modal transportation system for the Town of Westlake. These goals and policies should be supported with specific actions by the Town to assure that the desired levels of mobility, safety, and land use compatibility are attained. Goal 1: Develop a road system within Westlake that works with development standards to create a rural experience for the driver and reinforces a sense of community in Westlake. Policy 1.1 Develop roadways, where possible, that: • Use natural swales for drainage • Are constructed of high quality concrete or asphalt construction, without curbs and gutters. • Take advantage of views to hills, valleys, trees, and water. • Are bordered by densely landscaped thickets. Policy 1.2 Avoid frequent driveways or intersections along major and minor arterials. Policy 1.3 Vary horizontal and vertical alignment of directional travel lanes on major arterials. Goal 2: Develop roadways and circulation routes to take advantage of, and work with, the natural topography to enhance the community's rural character and design. Policy 2.1 Locate and design all roadways to minimize grading to both create the roadway and to create usable building sites. Policy 2.2 Major arterials should be laid out to follow topographic contours and to take advantage of views and vistas to landmark development or natural features such as hills, trees and water bodies. Policy 2.3 Locate and design local roadways to: • Avoid straight horizontal alignments • Preserve specimen trees and groves of trees • Create local views and vistas that reinforce the community's rural character Goal 3: Ensure that the Westlake thoroughfare and circulation system fits into regional circulation systems. Policy 3.1 Locate and design thoroughfares to facilitate regional circulation, but discourage "cut through" traffic in the Town. REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 4 Goal 4: Ensure a balanced relationship between land use development and the transportation system. Policy 4.1 Develop administrative procedures and responsibilities for the preparation, review and approval of land use-related transportation plans and development traffic impact studies. Policy 4.2 Maintain a Master Thoroughfare Plan coordinated with land use development considerations represented in the Comprehensive Plan which permits the following: • Right-of-way acquisition necessary to improve intersection capacity and thoroughfare continuity. • Right-of-way dedications as specified by the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Intersection designs and right-of-way alignments where possible as part of the Master Thoroughfare Plan. • Dedication of street system rights-of-way in those areas of the community that are undeveloped. Policy 4.3 Coordinate local, state and federal street and highway improvement project planning with existing and expected land uses. Policy 4.4 Locate and design thoroughfares to provide a high level of design amenity and neighborhood preservation, including the consideration of neighborhood traffic management programs. Policy 4.5 Develop and implement a roadway functional classification system which provides for a range of traffic flow functions from providing mobility for through traffic to providing access to adjacent properties. Goal 5: Ensure the development, maintenance and operation of a safe, efficient and effective transportation system to serve the Town. Policy 5.1 Develop and maintain a transportation planning process which addresses long range needs but emphasizes short and mid-range problem solving. Policy 5.2 Develop and maintain programs and funding strategies to implement transportation improvements, ensuring adequate capacity at the least cost to the Town without compromising service, delivery, or quality. Policy 5.3 Develop, maintain, and operate a street and highway system which will meet the existing and future travel needs of the Town in terms of safety and capacity. Policy 5.4 Investigate opportunities to provide a fiscally responsible transit system which gives consideration to journey-to-work trips, the needs of transit dependent persons, and opportunities for inter-modal transfer. REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 5 THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM The Thoroughfare Plan proposed for the Town of Westlake is based on a system of functionally classified roadways. These functional classifications are intended to reflect the role or function of each roadway within the overall thoroughfare system. Roadway Functional Classification System The functional classifications describe each roadway's function and reflect a set of characteristics common to all roadways within each classification. Functions range from providing mobility for through traffic and major traffic flows to providing access to specific properties. Characteristics unique to each classification include the degree of continuity, general capacity, and traffic control characteristics. Figure 2 illustrates the relative roles of each classification to achieve its intended function. Figure 2 (GRAPHICS) The vehicular road system is hierarchial in nature and includes freeways, major and minor arterials, collectors and local streets. Freeways, or expressways, are high capacity facilities with controlled access and are intended to carry high volumes of longer distance trips. They are a high capacity regional supplement to the arterial system. Arterials are used to move large volumes of through traffic at relatively high speeds throughout the community. Arterial streets are more or less continuous throughout the community and their primary function is to provide movement of traffic for arterials. Property access is a low priority function. The Collector system is used to carry moderate amounts of traffic and provide limited access to adjacent properties. Their function is to collect and distribute traffic to and from arterial and local streets. Local Residential Streets are used for low volume, low speed traffic movements. Their function is to primarily provide direct access to adjacent properties. Neighborhoods should be developed between arterial streets so that through traffic is routed around-not through-these areas. Collectors should penetrate the neighborhoods to collect and distribute traffic but not provide convenient, cut-through routes. Land use planning efforts should REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 6 attempt to encourage compatible land uses adjacent to streets. Commercial activities should be developed in such a way that the primary mobility function of arterials are not degraded through access management. Wherever concentrations of traffic occur on collector streets, consideration should be given to not allowing houses to front on the street. Good subdivision designs can allow ample lot yields while orienting houses to local streets and not to collectors. Table 1 describes the most important characteristics of the roadway functional classifications. The arterial classification contained herein includes major arterial and minor arterial. The following sections describe the major features of the proposed plan. The proposed Thoroughfare Plan for Westlake includes the three functional classifications discussed in the previous section: major arterials, minor arterials, and collectors. The proposed Thoroughfare Plan is shown on the map in Figure 3. REDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 7 TABLE 1 - Roadway Functional Classifications and General Planning Guidelines (Charts) REDAL:152129.120297-00040 8 LEGEND •■N•■■■ Major•Blvd. Arterial 186' R.O.W. (Avg.), 3e'-3e'Pavement Q� •••••••••••••••• Major Arterial 130' R.O•W., 3e'-3e' Pavement 1-- Minor Arterial 108' R.O.W.. 24'-24' Pavement Collector Undlvlded 90 R.O.W. 48' Pavement I g Q Not to Scale J � .� �.° Henrletta Creek Rd. q, ki 1 Dove Rd, , CC p -J C O o J ° F= o N -; 4 Note: See Figure 4 for Plan Cross-Sectlone FIGURE 3 THOROUGHFARE PLAN DESIGN GUIDELINES As stated previously, detailed design and construction standards for roadways are or will be included in the Town's Engineering Standards. Recommended supplemental design standards and guidelines associated with the proposed Thoroughfare Plan are presented below. For reference purposes, a graphic illustration depicting the recommended roadway cross sections is shown in Figure 4. Roadways 1. Roadway Alignment A. Roadways shall be placed in the center of the right-of-way, but may be shifted to avoid trees groupings. B. Roadways shall line up with roadways across an intersection. C. Roadways shall meet the intersection at an angle no less than 80 degrees and be straight for a distance of at least 150 feet. 2. Roadway Edge A. Where there is a natural edge to the roadway paving associated with a drainage swale, the roadway base shall extend past the edge of paving in accordance with the Town's Engineering Standards. B. Where curbs are allowed, mountable curbs or other less conventional curbing methods are encouraged. C. Sidewalks associated with roadways, when required, shall be constructed at the time of roadway construction, except where site construction will damage the sidewalk, in which case a bond shall be posted in accordance with the policies established in the Town's Unified Development Code. D. Landscaping associated with roadways such as the Median Landscape Development, as determined in the Westlake Unified Development Code, must be provided at the time of construction of the roadway. 3. Roadway Construction A. Roadways must be constructed in accordance with the Town's Engineering Design Standards, and concrete with a darkened surface is most desirable, although other options may be considered for approval. REDAL:152129.120297-00040 10 FIGURE 4 (GRAPHICS) nDAL:152129.1 20297-00040 I I Sidewalks 1. Residential District Sidewalks A. Sidewalks are required according to the following table-- (Charts) B. Residential sidewalks shall be required to provide access to schools, local parks and retail centers. C. A final determination of the number and location of sidewalks shall be made by the Board of Aldermen when approving a subdivision plat. 2. Commercial District Sidewalks Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of streets in commercial districts, although other options may be considered for approval. 3. Sidewalks Identified on Plats All sidewalks shall be identified on plats. 4. Sidewalk Design Standards A. Sidewalks should be laid out in a manner that minimizes straight lengths parallel to the roadway. They should follow a gentle curve alignment around groves of trees. B. Sidewalks, when required, shall meet the following minimum width standards. (Charts) C. Sidewalks should be constructed of reinforced concrete. UDAL:152129.1 20297.00040 12 pHrZ F_. SEMINOLE ;' X. 1 P� O. 'fly y v FRESH MEADOW m1'u om 1 1 \ res �.OL m)W Z , 1 CD X Lv JLfVERNESS _'� ` k` S QUI � _ � �' ) --- �-`R�`Pr,SED FEED FROM , E-LEP SUBSTA' 6) INVERNESS i Pr';POSED DUAL FEED 1000 M M FRC°)M IBM SUBSTATION IN UNDERGROUND I DU--T S. 'STEM IBM w � 4 SUBSTATION 1000 MCM 1 DOVE- W00� 114 } LEGEND TRI-COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL PROPOSED DUAL FEED FROM PREPARED FOR BLUM ENGINEERING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL IBM SUBSTATION PREPARED BY: TRI-COUNTY ELECTRIC COIPERATNE.1W NOTE' Each color signifies a different feeder OWN.BY Le W.By DwN APPD.BY;OWLI NOT TD -GALE ISSUE DATE:29 JUNE I�)' It 1' ,13 OP r IN�AERN ---------------- [�F- N T O N C O. WE > TLAKE ' MAHOTEA BOONE P > LEND TRI-COUNTY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. s.r..a.f.rr UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL EXISTING FACILITIES ON PREPARED FOR BLUM ENGINEERING OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL WESTLAKE PROPERTY PREPnED 1F•,0VNIr ELECTRC CCM)FfkATO.[.INC nwN.BY:La CK, uY.Dwu A'ro By DwM I NOT ,;• 966L 'L AIM` b90L-bZB(b lZ) xp3 'Lb9C-bZ8(,lZ) l rl ! bOZSL coxal'SDIIDO OOIL a1!nS •moMua�dx3 Io11u-3:41JON bbl,6u!maninS.6uuaau!6u3!DjnpmjS�y 1!^!0sJaaw6ua 6w}�nsuo�or/ uo!po�Dd�Oo luawdo!anaO pooMII!H m9•Ou! ' 3Nt/N4• SLA` O. 3ll3H008EPaPNoud 6ydou6adol lo!ey � 1 ii n Sb'X31 '3>ib'�1S3AA WIS3 MGM 1813J9wwoO)oi-Janeyy sJau}Jod aJinbonW S311nin ONIISIX3 ! I 1BM5 ll ' 11 11j Y. \ I 1 rl ! 1� I `1 aui� �aui�aJd----- � � —�-- 1/ I I Pa � 1/ I, I SID Soo Sl l 'Sl lr rfa I N wopl 00uo3 uareS mjo1!uDs 8 I/ I a=IS V uIDy1 a]JOJ»MaS mm7!uDS - SS•bZ 1 11 I l UWS) auo4d-N1 P-6uapu0 - ion11 i au!3 w10a!3 PDa41anO - 3HO I( I- l az15 IF u!cW i IDM - M.IZ 1 1(�I pua a iii ,1�2r r ' ?•I 11iF1 I 'a I I"j A@IPDJO > �l �o 0 esnoH I � lII r1 /lr II 1/ I II / 1 / c 1 ii� l o ujorj a»Oj jaaaS AID1!uDS w Ih a� 9n/0 --ICD If / lams /O` - " / \/ I / / // /oloM 00, oaz 0 (v tsvTj- - .- rv.Co 88 W� VHSaVN -IN I bil I n I79LHi '- ` "" - (4 -N—' --VNV INV I C_ 0. c -OqO SNIA 1 19 X co I nit TNs3v 0/1 12 d :)N3AOH 3% NO I IVISFIS S 3 IN 837 v 6 as',) t, i,-nabt Pt '- 8 �c NOSMig Jvv 6 (N O VAI/I V�c 0 fit, 11 a. w3w 0 q�- CP -1vvV I /V L r- I cl I 1,C 8 jl HO aSJV 0 ♦J1 Hs3v Lit, elel Iff I�N S co --t -r,r1H > 13vvv 0 3vo oq�co SI a nom" OC8 90�-dq C") Eb -+88 --L If c t7 sov zl� V v D/; 6 )8 3 as V LZ E121 3ADI 1,11H)l (4 8 A03 OLB, LO L L-, OL co Hl, N3 P4)NO,.f 6� El 0 d :IN3A N.Sl v "fid vv 0 0 pun I inog NNTID 0 t' //�w >10020000 WlP% ti �01 I LNIVI 11] D 30 N3811 11 M OL (2) -I A at io 09CH z V 8SOVv 118 81 VISIA V) T eu 9F H Hs3v ga%O (2) N 638141ISSON 110CH (a ME 12U 4!�3A WISJV zzt7 H 000n,SUNDI SE NVIba 3 9z V& 3-AV-1 f-Lv�O/ 8 3A N \31 qv� HIM 1 %s3vb S3vt, F--A� 09 vvv O/V IN Dvvv 0/0 3 6�8 C201 HO 09 M SEH 20ES —�S:) 198 OL - I w 0 Maaj M3 3snoi4 3381 ca Jvvv 0/Qq Eats cjj;� (A 0 "D )1338� n.nnL– H� 0 U 0 < 3 MI CVL 00E 91 9c a ( ) vu 08 as:) NVO ISIld p vt, ADTIOH kd3-.- vv 0/1 �91-jv C9 Mvv 3W ff- vzi— 201 ms3v ry m�l _b_ s Nwninv 0 3vvv 0/� 13-ISVH - 9773)1 9 98 N .98 WJIIE IM, OL Nsjvt7 091 IIUVINV'l > 99L 9 Col 0 HRNIM C98 bH co INVSV3Hd > H� X- 8 30 L In 0 OOE NI dS > 1.8 138TRUNDMOW (I - 9 (A . 13N 11� Iv?10/ )69EE XON> a i:;;;w;o ( F 8611 �111 8 g,§ -JA Is �O 8 NSOVO NIA!;V A v as3va 998 02 VII I S8 U < 89L ma is E O.N J v v NS30 �,D 69 ci r 98 C:) LM Hb 09 D 3b r /-B901 L) 'I- (E) �001 3vvv 0/t, > 00 3N0NVON - 131SVH - 833>1 n 1'1 >1 nj 901 9901 3vvv O/V 3N0 9 98 TN I v° ;U nu N 30 42CH aACJ I>1 v-11 S I wi I �90 1 ce) 92 z U N011VI 9 S < < WR jo Ns3vv 0 llZ=Ns3v '113 iNVNN 1 898 UU �O 03 ND1N3CGl 3vvv O/v 6 ---j Se I (And SS3NN3ANI CC) I>1 v I I S 3 m 2004 rybr 0 c3 D SSAk L, 8 OV2 -3j p HSltlbVd 0 Oc I v HI, 8sjvtr 3-10NIW3S w8ab, -- iE� LSO S,)no3 Sle -, .1, bo� 3. - J 1 09 -- ==�=p In 03 s:3wvr ma Nlvw EXHIBIT H. Open Space EXHIBIT I. View Corridor jj r •�� uu �•n- a� Q V/rjwl"_Jh .� _ w.•A M'A A h w„ 1.•n w ' t� nY-A 'A s o p i z 10 mazy ¢ ��/ / i;;s, � ��� ,. :Q •. r oi 7N Cc R\t'i:i h•fit h- :p S r� �1.. �_ � I , O )' 1 won 000i 64 MWA. r �,::, IVlIESOH, O ' � 0 ' ■ 14 100' minimum setback 150' average setback 1 OFFICE a' r OFFICE/ comm. E OFFICE OFFICE OFFIC OFFICE 00000 ✓• �% 5! 9 ------ PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, -OFFS x GOLF OFFICE OFFICE ' 4 a SINGLE I FAMLY Dove Road SINGLE FAMILY 1 OPEN $PAdE PLAN ]LEGEND Maverick Commercial Real Eplate =I�I= Property Line Date: July 10, 1998 ---------- Topography N -------- Flood Plain F9 F::9y': �'� Minimum Public Open Space( 83 Acres ) 0 100 300 500 1000 a __ Graphic scale in feet W Minimum Private Open Space ( 473 Acres ) Site Acreage ( 3143 Acres ) HKS Architects TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PROPOSED "ROAD RUNNER" SITE IN WESTLAKE, TEXAS Prepared by: DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc. Engineers •Planners 400 South Houston Street Suite 330 • Union Station Dallas, Texas 75202 Phone 214/748-6740 July 13, 1998 DT&A#98122 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................................1 SITE DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................................2 StudyArea ...................................................................................................................................2 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS .........................................................................................6 AnalyticalConcept......................................................................................................................6 Site-Generated Traffic Projection...............................................................................................7 Trip Generation and Mode Split........................................................... Trip Distribution and Assignment............................................................................................8 AnalysisTraffic Volumes............................................................................................................6 Traffic Operational Conditions Summary ...............................................................................1 1 RECOMMENDATIONS AND MITIGATION...............................................................12 DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. DeShazo,Tang&Associates,Inc. Engineers ♦ Planners 400 South Houston,Suite 330 Dallas,TX 75202-4899 214/748-6740 • FAX 214/748-7037 email: dtaino@onrarrrp.net TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Daniel Jeakins,AIA—HKS Architects FROM: DeShazo, Tang& Associates, Inc. DATE: July 13, 1998 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis for the Proposed "Road Runner" Site in Westlake, Texas (DT&A No. 98122) BACKGROUND The services of DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc. (DT&A) were retained by HKS Architects to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a proposed office development in Westlake, Texas. Also proposed in association with the site development is a zoning change request to a Planned Development (PD) with office uses permitted and a maximum FAR of 0.5. The site is currently zoned for office uses with a maximum FAR of 0.25 and R-40 residential uses. The purpose of the Zoning-Change Traffic Impact Analysis is to project and evaluate the impact to the operational conditions of the adjacent roadway system associated with the proposed development in comparison to the potential impacts generated by the existing zoning. DT&A's results, presented here, incorporate the level of analysis considered appropriate to address site-specific issues and needs in a manner which will assist in the following objectives: ♦ identify the contribution the subject site makes to the roadway system traffic loads ♦ provide a credible basis for recommending appropriate roadway improvements attributable to the project and background traffic, and ♦ assess the compatibility of the proposed site development with the local transportation plans. The methodologies applied in this analysis are consistent with the guidelines defined in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Traffic Access and Impact Studies for Site Development and incorporate the specific requirements of the Town of Westlake for a Zoning-Change Traffic Impact Analysis. DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 1 "Road Runner"TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 SITE DESCRIPTION The 311-acre subject site is located south of SH-114 and west of Precinct Line Road in Westlake, Texas approximately 8 miles northwest of DFW International Airport as shown Exhibit 1. The site is currently occupied for agricultural uses with nominal building improvements. As proposed,the site will consist of a corporate office development. The proposed building program by phase is summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Proposed Building Program F.A.R. QUANTITY Phase 1: General Office (estimated buildout 2000) 0.04 600,000 GSF Phases 1 +2: General Office (estimated buildout 2003) 0.25 3,400,000 GSF Phases 1 +2 +3: General Office (estimated buildout 2020) 1 0.50 6,800,000 GSF Study Area The extent of the study area considered in this analysis is a function of the scale of the proposed development and the configuration and prevailing condition of the regional transportation network. Based upon these guidelines, the study area considered in this analysis includes the following roadway links: ♦ SH-114: Texas State Highway 114 is a multi-lane regional roadway. Future plans call for the facility to be upgraded to a controlled-access freeway between DFW International Airport to the east and Interstate 35W to the west. Adjacent to the site exists the Denton- Tarrant county line. This boundary also represents the boundary between two districts of the Texas Department of Transportation(TxDOT): the Dallas District(Denton County)and Fort Worth(Tarrant County). At this delineation, the roadway changes from a multi-lane divided expressway in Tarrant County to a service road couplet system for a future freeway in Denton County.-Construction of the freeway isanticipated to occur hetwee -- ten years but is, in part, dependent on the pace of land development and subsequent traffic demand within the corridor. ♦ Kirkwood Boulevard: Kirkwood Boulevard is the major east-west thoroughfare planned in Westlake. The Westlake Thoroughfare Plan (see Appendix A) calls for a six-lane divided facility interchanging with SH-114 to the east and SH-170 to the west. Currently, the six- lane section is constructed adjacent to the Solana campus; west of this area, half of the boulevard (i.e., a two-lane section) is built transitioning into a rural cross-section. The roadway currently terminates at Precinct Line Road. ♦ Precinct Line Road: Precinct Line Road is currently constructed as a two-lane rural cross- section. Future TxDOT plans call for the roadway to be upgraded to a Farm-to-Market(FM) highway terminating at its intersection with SH-114 to the north. The roadway is planned to have a four-lane divided cross-section with curb and gutter drainage. DeShazo, Tang&Associates,Inc. Page 2 N nigCORKM - MIONCYi 4upiectTw i Si&_ NVORWAI NORM LAKE YAIAM N-LEM i 4 M irMw+ry -- -- ` elE .Ws NnNIOIIE oy..� 1v oaiMrw r/nE ad- -�—�--- come). TON SA04% gmI ;� – MMS ONAVEVN* AOOOM KELLO - FORM NOORNMI. aA1TMM WPM I GA1lN0 M N 11I WiEwom lLAIF - NIN6T ElVala Lw+ yy OWA"UAS MESOUR moo Y sEr�Fr wEN _ F 1 CH _,;• u,;vlIN1�0 I _ MILL �r 111fNiFriTU1 AN)I II S.E# Vw 'I _ MUSE FORW MNL . 1�. EVF1r1All i Z OOYREY L.: DES= UFWSM - - --• �. •IaaN Mal anw MF361O5 _ - --- — -- ,IE,as� 1 ALVPJW= Legend: = Subject Site Exhibit 1 Vicinity Map Road Runner TM DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. July 10, 1998 page 3 "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 The following roadway interchanges and intersections were also considered in this analysis ♦ SH-1 14 at Trophy Club Drive (currently signalized) ♦ SH-114 at Precinct Line Road (currently signalized) ♦ SH-114 at Kirkwood Boulevard (currently all-way STOP sign controlled, assumed to be signalized in future) ♦ Kirkwood Boulevard at Sam School Road (currently STOP sign controlled, assumed to be signalized in the future) a ♦ Kirkwood Boulevard at Precinct Line Road (currently STOP sign controlled, assumed to be signalized in the future) ♦ "Road Runner Road"1 at Precinct Line Road(future intersection, assumed signalized) ♦ "Road Runner Road" at Lake Turner Drive2 (future intersection, assumed signalized) The roadway network considered in this analysis incorporates some deviations from the current Town of Westlake Thoroughfare Plan. These modifications are considered to be consistent with planning concepts previously discussed with town staff, but will require formal Thoroughfare Plan amendments accordingly. A map illustrating the (assumed) future roadway network considered for this analysis is provided in Exhibit 2. Scenarios considered in this analysis include the following horizon years: ♦ 1998 - Existing baseline conditions ♦ 2000 - Phase 1 buildout conditions with background traffic increased at an average annual growth rate of 3 percent3 plus site-generated traffic ♦ 2003 - Phases 1 + 2 buildout conditions with background traffic increased at an average annual growth rate of 3 percent plus site-generated traffic ♦ 2020 - Regional buildout(Phases 1 +2 +3) conditions with background traffic increased at an average annual growth rate of 3 percent plus site-generated traffic East-west,four-lane,divided roadway through subject site(to be constructed). 2 Six-lane,divided roadway extension of Trophy Club Drive south of SH-114(to be constructed). 'Assumed value. DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 4 N TROPHY CLUB DR- Not to Scale NpRTy��s114 W y tN01gN C RFFKoR of ♦ �SKF TURNER FcP �o `I�RUHN Subject -U O 114 M O M O Site r ' Z M � o DOVE LN. 0 O Z D Legend: Cn SH 114 = Proposed Improvements (Year 2003) o = Planned Development Roadways ( Year 2000) ; Exhibit 2 Future Roadway Layout Road Runner TIA DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. July 10, 1998 Page 5 "Road Runner"TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The following procedures were used in the determination and analysis of site-related traffic impact. Analytical Concept The basic concept of a traffic impact analysis involves a comparison of operational traffic conditions within a defined study area which result from changes in traffic volumes and patterns attributed to a site's development. The net effect to the operational conditions is the site's traffic "impact". When the impact creates a degradation from acceptable to unacceptable operational conditions, mitigation is frequently required. Traffic operational conditions are commonly measured in terms of Level-of-Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative measurement of conditions which range from LOS A (the most desirable)to LOS F(the least desirable). In most instances,LOS D is considered the lowest acceptable condition. The qualitative definition of LOS corresponds to a quantitative measurement which represents the ratio of volume (demand)to capacity (supply) of a transportation facility. These quantities are calculated by applying standardized methods defined in technical reference documents. Roadway Intersections For roadway intersections, the Highway Capacity Manual (RCM is the traditional source of analysis methodology and LOS criteria. LOS is determined by calculating the average delay (in seconds) per vehicle during peak traffic demand periods. Delay may be measured for a particular traffic movement, intersection approach, or, for signalized intersections, the intersection as a whole. A summary of the LOS definitions from HCM for signalized and unsignalized intersections is provided in the following table: 1994 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL INTERSECTION LEVEL-OF-SERVICE CRITERIA UNSIGNALIZED SIGNALIZED LOS INTERSECTIONS INTERSECTIONS Average Total Delay Average Total Delay (Seconds per Vehicle) (Seconds per Vehicle) A <5.0 <5.0 B 5.1 to 10.0 5.1 to 15.0 C 10.1 to 20.0 15.1 to 25.0 D 20.1 to 30.0 25.1 to 40.0 E 30.1 to 45.0 40.1 to 60.0 F >45.0 >60.0 To further illustrate, detailed descriptions of each LOS for signalized intersections are provided in the following statements. DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 6 "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 Level-of-Service A describes operations with very brief delay, i.e., less than 5.0 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progressions are extremely favorable and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to minimal delay. Level-of-Service B describes operations with delay in the range of 5.01 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from good progression and/or longer cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A,causing higher levels of average delay. Level-of-Service C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. Level-of-Service D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high v/c ratios. Many vehicles stop and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level-of-Service E describes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. , These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume-to- capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. Level-of-Service F describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with over-saturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high volume-to-capacity ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing factors in delay levels. Site-Generated Traffic Projection The process used to project the added traffic volume associated with development of a particular site consists of four steps: trip generation, mode split, trip distribution, and traffic assignment. Results obtained from these steps are based upon available data and professional judgment. Under certain circumstances unique research data is available to supplement standard resources and may be applicable to this analysis. Use of such material is noted accordingly. Trip Generation and Mode Split Site-generated traffic is summarized in terms of trip ends during the peak traffic hour(s). Typically, the overall peak traffic demand periods occur during the traditional weekday commutes to and from work. A trip end is an origin or a destination. Each site-generated vehicle trip has two trip ends—one inbound and one outbound. An established source of trip generation information is ITE Trip Generation. This manual consists of a compilation of data collected across the country for various land uses. The trip generation characteristics for each land use are statistically summarized as a function of one or more DeShazo, Tang&Associates,Inc. Page 7 "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 independent variable (such as building gross floor area, number of employees, etc.). Generally, consideration of travel mode, vehicle occupancy, etc. is assumed to be sufficiently incorporated into this data. A summary of the resulting trip generation volumes for the proposed development is provided in Table 2. Copies of supplemental materials used in this analysis are provided in Appendix B. Tahle Z Site-Related Trip Generation Summary Quantity& Daily AM Peak-Hour PM Peak-Hour Phase Land Use F.A.R. Independent Trip Trip Ends Trip Ends Variable Ends Total In Out Total In Out I General Office 0.04 600,000 GSF 5,255 778 684 93 752 128 624 1+2 General Office 0.25 3,400,000 GSF 19,911 3,099 2,727 372 3,891 661 3,229 1+2+3 General Office 0.50 6,800,000 GSF 33,906 5,384 1 4,738 1 646 7,702 1 1,309 1 6,393 Trip Distribution and Assignment Trak expected to be generated by a development project must be distributed and assigned to the roadway system in order to analyze the impacts to roadway links and intersections within the study area. Trip distribution is an estimate of site-generated trip orientation by percentage based upon factors such as regional demographics, land use density, and roadway network configuration and conditions. Trip assignment is an allocation of site-generated vehicle trips to the available access points (driveways) and roadway links and intersections within the study area to determine traffic volumes at specific locations on the roadway network. For this analysis, demographic forecasts from the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) were used to distribute site traffic. The projected number of households for areas surrounding the subject site was used to distribute site-generated trips. By considering most convenient travel routes within the area of influence, site-generated traffic was distributed among and assigned to the roadways within the study area as summarized in Exhibit 3. Copies of material used in this analysis are provided in Appendix C. Analysis Traffic Volumes DT&A collected turning movement volumes and daily link volumes in July 1998, which represent existing baseline conditions. For each design year, background traffic was determined by applying a uniform growth rate as discussed previously, to which site-generated traffic was added. Detailed traffic volume data and graphic summaries for each scenario are provided in Appendix D. DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 8 25 N TROPHY CLUB DR. Not to Scale NpRTN� 114 r� 10 1N 10% �tAN 15% �► cRF F Z KpR. 00 40/ '- kF TURNER V-0 ' `� ?p/ r1 a 10%�► l5 1% s% co ■ ?8% 'f' Sub�ect4�, �1 �'0 114 �� ■ ma% Site r50/o w 5% 2% 'I% m 3�Z 0o 3% DOVE LN. s 65% Loi O 1°J° (P M Z r O Z O Legend: r O SH 114 = Proposed Improvements (Year 2003) 4 = Planned Development Roadways f Year 2000) 3 South Development Site-Generated Trip: Road Runner TIA DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc July 9, 1998 Page 9 N 25 TROPHY CLUB DR. Not to Scale 114 NORrHwFST H � 0;, %/ tNOtgN cR io� FFkOR. o� \moo /o 44kF TURNER ?'0 15% y ? sp R0 0 �3%45% ' R`AD Subject :;P 1 1f 114 N-+C71 O nOO OO Site' n 4r-50/- r r-5%r 5%--► "N 1% ' z 3%-- 2% m41 ° o 3 O % DOVE LN. 21 1 p sit, 65 m Z O z O Legend: 0 SH 114 = Proposed Improvements (Year 2003) 4 = Planned Development Roadways ( Year 2000) 3 Af North Development Site-Generated Trips Road Runner TIA DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. July 9, 1998 Page 10 "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 Traffic Operational Conditions Summary Application of the procedures defined in HCM to the traffic volume scenarios presented previously were conducted by use of the Synchro software package for signalized intersections and Highway Capacity Software (HCS) for unsignalized intersections. A summary of operational analysis results is provided in Table 3. Software output information worksheets are provided in Appendix E. a Table 3. Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Operations Analysis Summary Year 2000(Phs. l) Year 2003(Phs. 1+2) Year 2020(Phs. 1+2+3) Background Plus Site Background Plus Site Background Plus Site Intersection Traffic at 600,00 GSF Traffic at 3,400,00 Traffic at 6,800,000 Site Buildout GSF Site Buildout GSF Site Buildout SH-114 WB Service Rd at AM - LOS A AM - LOS B AM - LOS B Trophy Club Drive PM - LOS B PM - LOS B PM - LOS B SH-114 EB Service Rd at AM - LOS B AM - LOS B AM - LOS B Trophy Club Drive PM - LOS A PM - LOS B PM - LOS D SH-114 WB Service Rd at AM - LOS A AM - LOS C AM - LOS B Precinct Line Road PM - LOS B PM - LOS A PM - LOS B SH-114 EB Service Rd at AM - LOS B AM - LOS C AM - LOS D Precinct Line Road PM - LOS A PM - LOS C PM - LOS B SH-114 WB Service Rd at AM - LOS B AM - LOS B AM - LOS B Kirkwood Boulevard PM - LOS B PM - LOS A PM - LOS C SH-114 EB Service Rd at AM - LOS B AM - LOS B AM - LOS E Kirkwood Boulevard PM - LOS B PM - LOS B PM - LOS B Kirkwood Boulevard at Sam AM - LOS B AM - LOS B AM - LOS B School Road PM - LOS A PM - LOS B PM - LOS B Kirkwood Boulevard at Precinct AM - LOS B AM - LOS A AM - LOS B Line Road PM - LOS A PM - LOS B PM - LOS B "Road Runner Road"at Precinct AM - LOS B AM - LOS B AM - LOS B Line Road PM - LOS B PM - LOS C PM - LOS C "Road Runner Road"at Lake AM - LOS A AM - LOS B AM - LOS B Turner Drive PM - LOS A PM - LOS B PM - LOS B DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page II "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 RECOMMENDATIONS AND MITIGATION The purpose of this study is to project and evaluate the impact of operational conditions of the adjacent roadway system associated with a proposed, 311-acre corporate office development in Westlake, Texas. Zoning of the site currently permits office uses with a maximum 0.25 F.A.R. and R-40 residential uses; the proposed Planned Development zoning requested for the site would permit office uses up to 0.50 F.A.R. Modifications to the Thoroughfare Plan of the Town of Westlake are also proposed in accordance with Exhibit 2. The analysis conducted herein demonstrates that with the provision of enhanced intersection geometric configurations at key locations as listed below and summarized in Exhibit 4A through 4C, the roadway system can accommodate the site-generated traffic plus a modest growth rate of background traffic with acceptable operational conditions. Based upon the findings of the traffic analysis, the proposed Planned Development zoning is supported. Recommended Mitigation: SH114 Phase 3: Freeway in place; Provide Texas U-turn lanes at Precinct Line Road and Trophy Club Drive/Lake Turner Road interchanges Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 2: Four-to-six-lane boulevard to Precinct Line Road in place Precinct Line Road Phase 1: Upgrade to FM roadway with four-lane cross-section in place Phase 3: Construct six-lane cross-section between SH-114 eastbound service road to a point approximately 500 feet south of Kirkwood Boulevard with appropriate transitions Lake Turner Road (extension of Trophy Club Drive south of SH-114) Phase 1: Construct new six-lane cross-section "Road Runner Road" Phase 1: Construct a minimum two-lane roadway connecting Precinct Line Road with Lake Turner Road reserving right-of-way for future expansion to a multi-lane boulevard (this roadway to serve as site access and local traffic circulation) Phase 3: Construct second half of boulevard SH-114 at Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 1: Add traffic signalization at interchange SH-114 at Precinct Line Road Phase 2: Construct additional southbound through-lane through interchange; Phase 3: Construct additional left-turn lane on westbound Service Road approach; Construct additional northbound and southbound left-turn lanes through interchange; DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 12 "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 13, 1998 Construct additional free-right-turn lane on northbound approach of Precinct Line Road at eastbound Service Road (included in implementing six-lane cross-section as cited above) SH-114 at Trophy Club Drive Phase 1: Provide free-right-turn lane on northbound approach of Lake Turner Road at eastbound Service Road as part of six-lane boulevard construction Phase 3: Construct additional free-right-turn lane on eastbound Service Road; Construct additional left-turn lane on westbound Service Road; Construct additional northbound left-turn lane through interchange Kirkwood Boulevard at Sam School Road Phase 1: Add traffic signalization at intersection Phase 3: Construct additional left-turn lane on northbound approach of Sam School Road Kirkwood Boulevard at Precinct Line Road Phase 2: Add traffic signalization at intersection; Construct additional left-turn lane on westbound approach of Kirkwood Boulevard (included in extension of boulevard cross-section); Construct four-lane divided eastbound intersection approach (opposite Kirkwood Boulevard) serving north side of subject property Phase 3: Upgrade all intersection approaches to six-lane divided cross-section with auxiliary left-turn lanes at each intersection approach and an additional right-turn lane on westbound approach of Precinct Line Road "Road Runner Road"at Precinct Line Road Phase 1: Add traffic signalization (concurrent with initial construction of"Road Runner Road") Phase 2: Construct additional free-right-turn lane on southbound approach of Precinct Line Road "Road Runner Road"at Lake Turner Drive `-Road Runner Road"at Lake Turner Road Phase 1: Add traffic signalization (concurrent with initial construction of Lake Turner Road and"Road Runner Road"); Include left-turn lanes at southbound and westbound intersection approaches Phase 3: Construct additional left-turn lane at southbound approach of Lake Turner Road; Construct additional right-turn lane at northbound approach of Lake Turner Road END DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 13 N Not to Scale 7ROPMY CLUB DR. L 114 NORry��ST y Wy 11 X11 T INOIgNcR r I EKE TURNER �QPO rte\ �� ��� (Pti ' �R`NFR„RQ.40 � 1 Subject -00 114 n OO Site ` - z e��o i m '��' DOVE LN. S o q2l O (P m i z O r Legend: o — o = Phase 1 Lane Configuration Exhibit 4) Phase 1 Lane Configuratioi Road Runner TIA DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc July 10, 1998 Page I N TROPHY CLUB DR. Not to Scale L a 114 NRT/ 0 rHwY 114 1 r � INo1 � �AI CRFFkO R. 14 off p �kE TURNER R0 a P� l� d �� a y i lop ' llv Sub, ect -o �O 114 `IT " m OO J Site z194 ri ' m '1�' m DOVE LN. O N m Z r O Z O Legend• �o 0 = Phase 2 Lane Configuration Exhibit 48 Phase 2 Lane Configuratioi Road Runner TIA DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc Page I July 10, 1998 N TROPHY CLUB DR. Not to Scale L (%P- NO 11H /Hp/qN RFF Z 111 � R r \ �kF TURNER °PO ,J Subj,ect 114 S/�� Z � 0 r 4)4 m -� m DOVE LN. o O r D Legend: _ O = Phase 3 Lane Configurations O Exhibit 4C Phase 3 Lane Configuration Road Runner TM DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 16 July 10, 1998 N TROPHY CLUB DR. Not to Scale v Nm Ny cu 0)v p"�2� r2j514811 /Vp 114 o orn �'oJo 00 T y�FST NwY .'88(12g �� 0 3001 �wC"I-. e56`56 97q 4) IND,, A6 `691 33` N 8 (3(54) 99 69 (1,29 ' (64) ) a 0i 63011�Al �O i ' 117 00L, �2ca 0� (36) p�0(� oo� SKF T_NER ROAD rn o Ln ^' s ftoft _ Fti O vn cn 50(107) 9913581 P��s� R 1 13(27) 1oa1 �'o U " ♦ `R„R �� " ♦ w�� dip .' Subject114 m p O Site e 59411421 " ' n C(/D �66 (371 128(650)y Z 14 (167) M0 J DOVE LN. Legend: M W D 123 (456) = Existing Traffic Volumes n O =PM Peak Hour O (5:00 PM -6:00 PM) =AM Peak Hour (7:15 AM - 8:15 AM) Existing Turning Movements Road Runner TIA DeShazo, Tang& Associates, Inc. July 10, 1998 taw BVOLS AM PEAK HOUR SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 110 187 56 WbR p'< WBR WBR 1030 WBT 1 WBT $'WBT 0 95 0`NBL a_. WBL k WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL EBL ? EBL ' �6'ku EBT EBT EBT a EBR "`r[ EBR 27 45 EBR � w,Elg NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 4 0 49 149 L , =,4.t HQ EBLW?kWLAKE TURNERWBR EBL 0 PRECINCT LINE 53 WBR EBLSAMSCHOOL -WVWBR EBT AT WBT EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBT ATEBRROAD RUNNER RDN�fffi� WBL EBR 0 KIRKWOOD 14 WBL EBR 'KIRKWOOD WBL NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL GROWTH FACTOR EBLPRECINCT LINE #1 WBR 3.0% PER YEAR EBT AT " p ,x €WBT 2 YEARS EBR 4i ROAD RUNNER RD Q WBL NBL NBT NBR PM PEAK HOUR SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT WER 0 WBR 33 517 170 WBR W W.,T 2Q4WBT 50 WBT WBT 7. L w Qg:WBL 318 63 97 BL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL EBL 0 68 .. A' EBL 33. 174 428, EBT EBT 1142 EBT Q EBR L.e c 'pI EBR 38 97 54EBRW2 38 #1�. NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 0 27 80 9 EBL O'LAKE TURNER WBR EBL 0 PRECINCT LINE 114 WBR EBL " SAM SCHOOL 0 WBR . � ,_, EBT ` AT WBT EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBT AT 1i WBT EBR ROAD RUNNER RD WBL EBR 0 KIRKWOOD 29 WBL EBR s KIRKWOOD WBL p: 0 37 371, NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL 0 55 0 EBL 0 PRECINCT LINE 0 WBR EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBR Q,ROAD RUNNER RD 0 WBL 0 74 0 NBL NBT NBR Pagel 13ackyround TrdVic. Volumes of Phase 1 S;+e-buddout Yedr- ­uj BVOLS AM PEAK HOUR SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 1W3R t Q: t WBR1� WBR WBT 9 X158 WBT WBT WBL5 "o.: lm WBL , \WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL 3i�� EBL �'S (� :` EBL a`j j.,,Z`�4aku ` EBT EBT EBT EBR 13s�..3 EBRmmmabkm EBRG� NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 0 78 187ft 0 x EBL LAKE TURNER .WBR EBL O PRECINCT LINE 83 WEIR EBL SAM SCHOOL s Tei WBR EBT AT WBT EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBT a AT ;WBT EBR X26 ROAD � WBL EBR - 0 KIRKWOOD 40�WBL EBR 'KIRKWOOD WBL _. ,..�T ap Q 45 4511 1 lit, NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR IN NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL la 98 a4mar GROWTH FACTOR EBL 'PRECINCT LINE �Q WBR 3.0% PER YEAR EBT 01 AT 0 WBT 5 YEARS EBR ? ROAD RUNNER RD e WBL A, NBL NBT NBR PM PEAK HOUR SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 16 34 2WEIR ?a a '=Od' [}`:WBR 573 24 WBR a 2WBT k 2 8 W B T 7.WBT 0. 12 Q;°WBL 0; . 6C WBL 45 9 14 WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL 12 75 9 EBL Q_ ;i � =4i EBL 5 25 61 EBT K158 EBT 1 EBT 0' EBR kil,50 75 75, EBR 9„ � EBR 7 1 1 51 87 NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 0 125 25 0 0 0 EBL 0 LAKE TURNER 25 WBR EBL U_PRECEINCT LINE �49WBR EBL 0 SAM SCHOOL 0 WBR EBT 125E AT WBT EBT AT �� WBT EBT 754 AT 165 WBT prt EBR ROAD RUNNER RD WBL EBR {�KIRKWOOD �b¢ WBL EBR 184 KIRKWOOD 43_WBL a _.... ,...... . 0 63 , , . NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL 2 „ ,c EBL 5'PRECEINCT LINE EBT Q•` AT �� WBT EBR ROAD RUNNER RD O WBL NBL NBT NBR Page 1 aack9rour1d Traffic Volurnos dt Phase 2 &&-Buildout Year 2020 BVOLS AM PEAK HOUR SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT � WER y":0' WWBR a @ WBR . WEIT WBT n( WBT EWHO iwBL ' ° weL � WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL s " EBL IRI 0 EBLp1 1222 EBT EBT EBT �� Q EBR . EBR ..� ",. # s EBR NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL $ r 0 163 293 EBLLAKE TURNER WBR EBL 0 PRECINCT LINE 171 WEIR EBL SAM SCHOOL 0 WBR EBT AT WBT EBT ' 0 AT 0 WBT EBT � '� �} AT 19 WBT EBR ROAD RUNI AMWBL EBR 0 KIRKWOOD 100 WBL EBR 'KIRKWOOD WBL 0 133 108 $,. a w':0. v, NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL 0._..213 _ 0 GROWTH FACTOR E8L 75 PRECINCT LINE 0 WBR 3.0% PER YEAR EBT 0 AT 0 WBT 22 YEARS EBR 75 ROAD RUNNER RD 0 WBL 75 165 0 95.0%THROUGH VOLUME ON SH-114 NBL NBT NBR DIVERTED TO FREEWAY PM PEAK HOUR SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 207 1¢ WER 0 0! p WBR 59 933 3D7 WBR WBT 185 WBT 5 WBT WE 7b ....:,.257 A�a�.N _..27 0� �� WBL 55 113 .174 WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL 157 123 1151 EBLM31 _73 0, EBL 59 314 774 EBT X101 EBT EBT 0 EBR a EBR 1 EBR 94 646 1117 NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL EBL OLAKETURNER WBR EBL A�z�Q PRECINCT LINE WBR EBL 0 SAM SCHOOL 0 WBREBT AT WBT EBT AT WBT EBT 1245 AT 272 WBT EBRROAD RUNNER RD WBL EBRe;, KIRKWOOD WBL EBR 320 KIRKWOOD 71 WBL Y 0 167 142; 23 0 103 NBL NBT NBR NBL NET NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL 75 200 0 EBL 75 PRECINCT LINE 0 WBR EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBR 75 ROAD RUNNER RD ''' p WBL 75 234 0 __. NBL NBT NBR Page 1 Background Tray-Pic, Volumes df Ph86e. 3 SI'+L buildout Yedr- PHASt i 5VOLS (AM) BACKGROUND PLUS SITE (AM PEAK HOUR) SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 1 : 1 v ;:;0 5 292; 379`WBR th 9 A..8 WBR WBR WBT WBT 8WBT WBL a 6° A; WBL 34 16$ 653 WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH-114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL X95' 137 187 EBI. 'x ; 47 .(1 EBL 1111 711 233 EBT 1752 EB 17 EBT 0 EBR 103 14 19 EBR82; EBR 435 105 119 NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 0 0 137 kL�e 0 391» 149 0 0 0 _. ._.: EBL 0.LAKE TURNER 19 WBR EBL 00-1 PRECINCT LINE 53 WBR EBL 0 SAM SCHOOL 0 WBR EBT �� AT 0 WBT EBT �� AT �'OWBT EBT 140' AT 664''WBT EBR �0 ROAD RUNNER RD 0 WBL EBR ' . �KIRKWOOD $9.WBL EBR 18KIRKWOOD 70 WBL 168 0 30 NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL 192 268 0 EBI. 26 PRECINCT LINE 0 WBR EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBR 4 ROAD RUNNER RD 0 WBL 27 64 0 NBL NBT NBR Pagel A.M. Peak Dour Background Plus Site Ganef-afecl Tf-CIMC, Volumes �or -fhe Pk;:) ^ CA I C� }n - AiI1 1i1n � PHASE .i bVOLS (PM) BACKGROUND PLUS SITE (PM PEAK HOUR) SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 115 64I 154 WBR p Q Q WBR r, WBR 2052 WBT `207 WBT WBT 94 87 26 WBL 5 ,r 0 119'WBL _ 6a WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL 87 26 64 EBL s ! ,"ce`a EBL 33 180 429' EBT 1129 EBT � EBTS�sa EBR 19 94 125 EBRAMMAR EBR �2; 358 650 . .0 NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 0 0 26 , _ 0 . 0 EBL 0 LAKE TURNER 125 WBR EBL `PRECINCT LINEWBR EBL O;SAM SCHOOL 0 WBR EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBT ATS WBT EBT X21 AT 157'WBT EBR _ 0 ROAD RUNNER RD 0,WBL EBR �a ,_ �:���KIRKWOOD WBL EBR x l9&KIRKWOOD 39.WBL 0 0 a 0987n 17 0 57 NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL 94 0 EBL 175 PRECINCTfLINE 0 WBR EBT 0 AT 0 WBT EBF 25 ROAD RUNNER RD 0 WBL 5 261 0 NBL NBT NBR Pagel PA, Peak Flour Back�iroutiJ Plus &te, - Generated IF,141c Volumes t fie. PHASc z 6VOLS (AM) BACKGROUND PLUS SITE(AM PEAK HOUR) SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 121 22 � WBR 3 Qs WBR 6 31,9 414 WBR �WBT WBT 9'WBT 96 ' 129; 52 WBL 3 _ Qk 1151W131—WBL 53 '183' 812'WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH 114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL t 104' 552,..'an2Q EB! 0153.. :. i 0` EBL " 122; 878 255` EBT21$1 EB 2038 EBT EBR i, `�i2.�.....w:. 4Q EBR 272 ? 176; EBR .5. 1 5 144 NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 434: 1' EBL , 0 LAKE TURNER 82 WBR EBL 9 PRECINCT LINE 83i WBR EBL 0 SAM SCHOOL 0 WBR EBT 125 AT O WBT EBT � �; AT 8 WBT EBT 167: AT 825 WBT EBR y 25'ROAD RUNNER RD 25'!WBL EBR � } KIRKWOOD WBL EBR x ' 27 KIRKWOOD 77 WBL _ Q 0 0 r 27 56 _5 '-: 243 0 32 m , w NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR 84 SBT SBL (� EBL_ 1051PRECINCT LINE 0 WBR EBT ,p AT WBT EBR 36 ROAD RUNNER RD WBL NBL NBT NBR I Pagel A.M. Peak Hour 1�ackyoutid Plus Site - Ge-vi&rafed T fftc, Volumes �or fhe PHASE 2 SVOLS(PM) BACKGROUND PLUS SITE (PM PEAK HOUR) SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT 22WBR ' .0... WBR a 73, 24;WBR � 1 WBT WBT vT WBT 166 WBLAiol2 � .(1 q$1 WBL 47„WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SHI14 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL EBL 3 � a �::dY EBL 5 58 61 EBT EBT 2 � EBT 0 EBR ..w3 EBR 38, OOq21 EBR »w 7, 51 249 NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL ,w s 1; 1 e83. 252. .,.`112. 0 0 0 EBL LAKE TURNER 3 WBR EBL PRECINCT LINE 149 WBR EBL 0 SAM SCHOOL 0 WBR EBT AT �... WBT EBT AT 17b WBT EBT 915 AT 198 WBT EBR ROAD RUNNER RD5 WBL EBP, _ KIRKWOOD 93'WBL EBR 290'KIRKWOOD 43'WBL »„ Q�,.»_,:. ,.,Q. 0 M� »7 034 275. 34 0 63 NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL 161 184 0 EBL. 719 PRECINCT LINE 0 WBR EB 0 AT 0 WBT EBF: 122 ROAD RUNNER RD 0 WBL 45 597 0 NBL NBT NBR Pagel P�I. Pea k Noun- Backsrou nd Plus /1Site -ff7�Ciane r-dfad Tr iff fc Volumes dor -rhe ph�Ca 7 n1 Ld - 91111i1nlI-- PHASr- .3 oVOLS (AM) BACKGROUND PLUS SITE (AM PEAK HOUR) SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT `, " 199 87: 102 WBR WBR 027WBR QJ �9 3,i:WBT WBT WBT 161� 881,-,,`-,,!, WBL 59�WB L 303: 15 WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH114 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL '31' 954 337 EBLj 422 EBL -rg , # B-1 EE EBT 62!1 E EBRS 256 288 EBF EBR 190 239 NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 0 300 761 'Ya5=052 EBL 104k,, 0,LAKE TURNER Ill WBR EBL PRECINCT LINEo WBR EBL SCHOOL 0 WBR `1 EBT Ojz0e AT 0 WBT EBT AT WBT EBT AT 1375 WBT ROAD RUNNER RD 50 WBL EBR KIRKWOOD EBR WBL EBR KIRKWOOD 126 WBL 0 0 0 54 NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL E I6I'll 11'��, t- , ,,,,9 34 EBL il- AI PRECINCT LINE WBR WBT EBT AT EBR ROAD RUNNER RD WBL mkkj NBL NBT NBR Pagel Peak dour Bac :c�rour�cl plus Site - caeneraW Traffic Volumes tr 4w- A.A. Pkrt-,.a � Sid - R11dAf)11+- PHASE 3 SVOLS(PM) BACKGROUND PLUS SITE(PM PEAK HOUR) SBR SBT SBR SBT SBR SBT WBR 4 r3 WBR WBR WBT � a WBT WBT WBL W B L !" �M.x24t� WBL NBL NBT NBL NBT NBL NBT SH114 @ TROPHY CLUB SH`d 14 @ PRECINCT LINE RD SH114 @ KIRKWOOD BLVD SBT SBL SBT SBL SBT SBL EBL 579 354 115 EBL r 664 Q• EBL u 3 v 4. Q 7�4 EBT EBTQ3 EBT EBR 974 1294 EBR !$49 1931` EBR g ...�... NBT NBR NBT NBR NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL SBR SBT SBL 0 300 246 516 169 EBLLAKE TURNER 689 WBR EBL. ' , 1Q`'PRECINCT LINE 28Q`WBR EBL Q' SAM SCHOOL Q`WBR EBT AT 0 WBT EB 6 AT " `WBT EBT 566 AT 338'WBT 1r EBR ROAD RUNNER RD 50WBL EBR ,KIRKWOOD �WBL EBR12',.KIRKWOOD 71 WBL 0 0 0 „�3 " 2A85 558; 62 ._.. 1Q3' NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR NBL NBT NBR SBR SBT SBL EBI. 144 PRECINCT LINE O'WBR EBT Q AT 4?,WBT EBR 67 ROAD RUNNER RD Q WBL 114 X 120ft � 7 NBL NBT NBR I Pagel PA. Pedl< Noor Ba,:kcyound Plus Sffe- Czernerated Traffic Volumes 6- Ao- "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 10, 1998 Appendix A The Westlake Thoroughfare Plan DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Thoroughfare Plan for The Town of Westlake A Component of The Comprehensive Plan Submitted to The Town of Westlake, Texas Submitted By Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Approved and Adopted by the Board of Aldermen on November 25, 1996 Town of Westlake THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM The Thoroughfare Plan proposed for the Town of Westlake is based on a system of functionally classified roadways. These functional classifications are intended to reflect the role or function of each roadway within the overall thoroughfare system. Roadway Functional Classification System The functional classifications describe each roadway's function and reflect a set of characteristics common to all roadways within each classification. Functions range from providing mobility for through traffic and major traffic flows to providing access to specific properties. Characteristics unique to each classification include the degree of continuity, general capacity, and traffic control characteristics. Figure 2 illustrates the relative roles of each classification to achieve its intended function. Figure 2 A.MUNUM ` ACCESS FUNCTION 2 O � F U W MOVEMENT FUNCTION aS � `�t� i r r•.y•Mc • i Yl KQif trtir� Mrtwu • muft a uw a► su The vehicular road system is hierarchial in nature and includes freeways, major and minor arterials, collectors aihd local streets. Freeways,or expressways, are high capacity facilities with controlled access and are intended to carry high volumes of longer distance trips. They are a high capacity regional supplement to the arterial system. Arterials are used to move large volumes of through traffic at relatively high speeds throughout the community. Arterial streets are more or less continuous throughout the community and their primary function is to provide movement of traffic for arterials. Property access is a low priority function. The Collector system is used to carry moderate amounts of traffic and provide limited access to adjacent properties. Their function is to collect and distribute traffic to and from arterial and local streets. Local Residential Streets are used for low volume, low speed traffic movements. Their function is to primarily provide direct access to adjacent properties. November 25, 1996 Thoroughfare Plan Page 8 Table 1 - Roadway Functional Classifications and General Planning Guidelines Approximate Speed Spacing Direct Land Access Minimum Roadway Limit Classifications Function Continuity Miles Intersection Spacing (mph) Parking Comments )~retgy:and ' Traffic Movement Continuous 4 None 1 mile 45-55 Prohibited Examples: SH 114 and. Expressway - (Except between SH 170 access ramps on Supplements capacity.' frontage roads, and arterial street system where constructed) and provides high speed mobility. Arterial Moderate distance inter- Continuous 1/2- 1 1/2' Restricted-some 1/8 mile 35-45 Prohibited Examples: Kirkwood community, intrametro' movements may be 1/4 mile on regional Blvd, Precinct Line Rd, area,traffic movement. prohibited;number route and Dove Rd. Minor function-land and spacing of Backbone of street access should primarily driveways controlled. system. be at intersections. May be limited to major generators on regional routes. Collector Primary-collect/distribute Not necessarily 1/4 - 1/2' Safety controls; 300 feet 30 Limited Examples: Sam School traffic between local continuous; limited regulation. Rd. streets and arterial may not extend Through traffic should system. Secondary-land across arterials. be discouraged. access Tertiary- interneighborhood traffic movement. Local Land Access None As needed Safety control only 300 feet 30 Permitted Through traffic should be discouraged 'Spacing determination should also include consideration of(travel projections in the area or corridor based on)ultimate anticipated development. Denser spacing needed for commercial and high density residential districts. 'Metro(metropolitan)area includes Westlake and the surrounding urbanized area. LEGEND ■ ■■■■N Major Blvd. Arterial 185' R.O.W. (Avg.), 38'-38'Pavement •••••••••••••••• Major Arterial 130' R.O.W., 3a'-36' Pavement —^-— — Minor Arterial 108' R.O.W., 24'-24' Pavement v Collector Undivided 00' R.O.W.. 48' Pavement N A. I oQ Not to Scale 114 Henrietta Creek Rd. O Al o o� Cr \% Dove Rd. f _ d cc a: O J ' C O o �' 0 2•i N ¢ ' a - - .Ee m to a Note: See Figure 4 for Plan Cross-Sections FIGURE 3 THOROUGHFARE PLAN -Town of Westlake- DESIGN GUIDELINES As stated previously, detailed design and construction standards for roadways are or will be included in the Town's Engineering Standards. Recommended supplemental design standards and guidelines associated with the proposed Thoroughfare Plan are presented below. For reference purposes, a graphic illustration depicting the recommended roadway cross sections is shown in Figure 4. Roadways 1. Roadway Alignment A. Roadways shall be placed in the center of the right-of-way, but may be shifted to avoid trees groupings. B. Roadways shall line up with roadways across an intersection. C. Roadways shall meet the intersection at an angle no less than 80 degrees and be straight for a distance of at least 150 feet. 2. Roadway Edge A. Where there is a natural edge to the roadway paving associated with a drainage swale, the roadway base shall extend past the edge of paving in accordance with the Town's Engineering Standards. B. Where curbs are allowed, mountable curbs or other less conventional curbing methods are encouraged. C. Sidewalks associated with roadways,when required, shall be constructed at the time of roadway construction, except where site construction will damage the sidewalk, in which case a bond shall be posted in accordance with the policies established in the Town's Unified Development Code. D. Landscaping associated with roadways such as the Median Landscape Development, as determined in the Westlake Unified Development Code, must be provided at the time of construction of the roadway. 3. Roadway Construction A. Roadways must be constructed in accordance with the Town's Engineering Design Standards, and concrete with a darkened surface is most desirable, although other options may be considered for approval. November 25, 1996 Thoroughfare Plan Page 12 Average 186' R.O.W. (130' Minimum) � MAJOR BOULEVARD Var. ARTERIAL 4' Swk. 4' Swk. 19'-34' 38' 20'-60' 38' 19'-34' 130' R.O.W. Var. V ar. MAJOR ARTERIAL 4' Swk. 4' Swk. 24' 38' 20' 36' 14' 108' R.O.W. � Var Var. t MMR ARTERIAL f� H ` 4' Swk. 4' Swk. 24' 22' 24' 22' 14' 90' R.O.W. COLLECTOR '%114' Swk. 4' Swk. 20' 44' 28' 80' R.O.W. LOCAL RESIDENTIAL SIDEWALKS I LOCAL Location varies from edge of pavement. RESIDENTIAL STREET 12,000 SF Lots=Wntk on both sides 12,001 SF Lots to 30,000 SF Lote=Walk on one ek 16' 30' 16' 30,001 SF Lots and greater=No sidewalks FIGURE 4 DESIGN STANDARD CROSS-SECTIONS ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION CATEGORIES TOWN OF WESTLAKE "Road Runner"TIA in Westlake July 10, 1998 ;Appendix B Trip Generation DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Land Use: 710 General Office Building Description A general office building houses multiple tenants; it is a location where affairs of businesses, commercial or industrial organizations, or professional persons or firms are conducted. An office building or buildings may contain a mixture of tenants including professional services; insurance companies; investment brokers; and tenant services such as a bank or savings and loan institution, a restaurant or cafeteria, and service retail facilities. Nearly all of the buildings surveyed were in suburban locations. Corporate headquarters (land use 714), single tenant office building (land use 715), and office park (land use 750) are related uses. If information is known about individual buildings, it is suggested that the general office building category be used rather than office parks when estimating trip generation for one or more office buildings in a single development. The office park category is more general, and it should be used when a breakdown of individual or different uses is not known. If the general office building category is used and if additional buildings, such as banks, restaurants, or retail stores are included in the development, then the development should be treated as a multiuse project. On the other hand, if the office park category is used, internal trip making is already reflected in the data and does not need to be considered. When the buildings are interrelated (defined by shared parking facilities or the ability to easily walk between buildings) or house one tenant, it is suggested that the total area or employment of all the buildings be used for calculating the trip generation. When the individual buildings are isolated and not related to one another, it is suggested that the trip generation be calculated for each building separately and then summed. Additional Data Average weekday transit trip ends— Transit service was either nonexistent or negligible at the majority of the sites surveyed in this land use. Recent studies indicate increased use of transit, carpools, and other transportation demand management{TDM) strategies.-Informatio- has not been analyzed to document the impacts of TDM measures on the total site generation. The average building occupancy varied considerably within the studies where occupancy data was provided. For buildings with occupancy rates reported, the average percent of occupied gross leasable area was 88 percent. In some regions peaking may occur earlier or later and last somewhat longer than the traditional 7:00 A.M. to 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. peak period time frames. The sites were surveyed from the 1960s to the 1990s throughout the United States. Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1043 Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Characteristics The trip generation for the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of the generator typically coincide with the peak hours of the adjacent street traffic; therefore, only one A.M. peak hour and one P.M. peak hour, which represent both the peak hour of the generator and the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic, are shown for general office buildings. Source Numbers 2, 5, 20, 21, 51, 53, 54, 72, 88, 89, 92, 95, 98, 100, 159, 161, 172, 175, 178, 183, 184, 185, 189, 193, 207, 212, 217, 247, 253, 257, 260, 262, 279, 295, 297, 298, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 321, 322, 323, 324, 327, 404, 407, 408, 418, 419, 423 Trip Generation, 6th Edition 1044 Institute of Transportation Engineers General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday Number of Studies: 78 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 199 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 11.01 3.58 - 28.80 6.13 Data Plot and Equation 15,000 14,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . . . , X. . . . .; .. . . .: . . .,/. 13.000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . 12.000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:�.. . . . . . . . 11,000 : . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . ... . . . .-�r'.�. . . ... . . . . c10,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . W CL H9,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .X. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m L8,000 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y7,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . :. . . . . .•. .I.. . . . . . `m 6.000 . . . . . .. . . . . . ... . . . . ... . '. ,. .x. . . II . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . �'x. . . . .,<'. X _X 5,000 . . . . .,. . . . . .; . . . . .: . . . . .: . . . . .. . . . . . '..X/ 4,000 . .X. . . . . . . . .X. . . . .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XX ,r' x x X 3,000 . . . . . ... . . . . . .. .. . . X' X X : X 2,000 X. C . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . . .: . .. . .: . . . .. .. . . . . X ' /X X 1,000 X. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . .:. . . . . .:. . . . . .:. . . . . .. . . . .. : . . . xx 0 i 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T)=0.768 Ln(X)+3.654 R2=0.80 Trip Generation,6th Edition 1052 Institute of Transportation Engineers General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, A.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies: 216 Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 223 Directional Distribution: 88% entering, 12% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.56 0.60 - 5.98 1.40 Data Plot and Equation 4,000 3.000 . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y c w a x d U ' L 2.000 '� . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X cn > .:X Q . . I I X ~ -Sc X t000 x . . . - - . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . R. X Xw' X X XX XX�Xx X , XXX 0 X 0 1000 2000 3000 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T)= 0.797 Ln(X)+ 1.558 R2=0.83 Trip Generation,6th Edition 1053 Institute of Transportation Engineers General Office Building (710) Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area On a: Weekday, P.M. Peak Hour Number of Studies: 234 I Average 1000 Sq. Feet GFA: 216 i Directional Distribution: 17% entering, 83% exiting Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 1.49 0.49 - 6.39 1.37 F Data Plot and Equation 4,000 i x 3.000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . } LO W a H U L > 2.000 ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y 1 < x' F u . H x IX I� x x x 1,000 . . . . . . . . . . .x. . . . . . X' x xx x x XX x . xx x x t x 0 0 1000 2000 3000 X= 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Floor Area X Actual Data Points Fitted Curve ------ Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T= 1.121(X)+79.295 R2=0.82 Trip Generation,6th Edition 1054 Institute of Transportation Engineers "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 10, 1998 ,Appendix C Trip Distribution DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. North Central Texas 1994 ra Demog p hic Forecasts f � _ North Central Texas Council of Governments Research and Information Services Fall 1994 mON ON Ilk! \� � W \�. �� 17111,44,Ill 41.05 137.08 136.11 136.1 JC 192.10 1 a 1.08 137.09 190.09 181.07 137.07136.1 JB 36.1 JB JD JE 190.10 JF 141.07 \ 137.10 V MW 36. 141.98JA 192.0 137.02 HE JL 190.06 HT HL HG HD. MR HP139. 191.00 190.07 K C HB HA GV 141.09 HN HM HH HF w 190.12 ` 00 GH 190.04 GX 181.06 141.1 140 \FW 132.00 GD GW 188.01 181.08 .02 138.02 140.01 GJ GV 96.OB 96.03 78.04 90.1 GG GK 188.02 141.11 9&06 96.07 96.09 135.00 X N FY 78.05 78.10 131.01 D 185.04 GL 87.00 182.01 181.16 14 7.01 FU DJ DK \6' 185.01 182.02 95.00 76.01 GB 76.04 C DG DL N 183.00 181.17 .04 99.00 � 181.10 141.12 8.01 FN 74.00 GA U 77.00 78.01 78.16 GM GN FT 130.O4 DP 7 DR 73.D pB D GP GR 181.18 181.19 FL 142. 73.02 195.01 DA 78.09 \ 128.00 DV FJ \\A 181.12 FG 71.0 D 79.02 12 00 FE ,7 T Cw DU 126.02 181.13 V,•V 142.02 4.03 8200 181.15 146.00 47.00 148.01 \ CU FA FB AB 3.0 BA 80.00 87.00 DW DX 180.00 178.08 144.03 FC AE c A 179.M. 178.09 EY 14 150.00 CR AD� F A 1.00 - -- - 123. �. 100.00 JP AU AT DY 48.02 H B 178.06 181.04 EX AK AM AP 12. 122.04 178.04 178.10 Ll EW 151.00 178.05 J C� 25.00 122.OY UC n h•V 151.00 106.00 N CP 101.0 BE BC 153.01 1 105.00 CL 43.00 BF L 8.00 27.01 177.01 177.02 154.01 33 T_1 0 _ CH .00 85.00 BM BG BD S-4.00176.02 Y 121.00 107.01 CJ BL 175.00 155.00 EV 57' 158.00 CK BW BV BK 91.01 0.02120.00 176.01 RX GT 67.00 45.00 C7.0 89.00 1 1 160.00 159.00 CF BY CB BR 91.02 92.01 119.00 10 02 CG 93.01 9202 173.02 1102CE SA'00 63.02 CC 54. BTBP BN 93.03 118.00 JR 161.00 108.01 6.02 l'� 162.00 163.00 ,`Z, 93.04 117.00 164.02 108.02 63.01 D 56.00 88.0 ED 116.01 / GU 179.07 1-� 164.03 � 108.03 \ 61. EG 60.02 87.04 65.01 EH 9.01 EC 114.02 116.02 164.01 �P EJ 114.01 j_ 170.02 EM EB 164.04 109.00 ty 165.12 ET ER Ep 171.00 • � EK `7 167.01 165.13 65.0 EN 165.10 1 E.9.02 i�� 167.02 EU 165.09 166.06 166.05 170.01 166.08 166.1 �S 168.01 166.09 v� 169.04 166.12 166.11 LZ iL 165.05 166.13 169.03 166.04 168.02 Dallas County Map Dallas County 1990 Census Tracts Reference Table for Small Tracts A 15.03 BM 90.01 OB 79.06 ER 111.01 GE 131.03 HU 141.01 AA 4.04 BN 86.01 DC 79.07 ET 166.07 GF 185.03 HV 136.16 AB 6.01 BP B8.01 DO 79.08 EU 165.11 GG 190.19 HW 136.12 AC 196.00 M 49.00 DE 79.03 EV 156.00 GH 190.18 HX 201.98 AD 6'04 BT 55.00 OF 78.17 EW 153.02 GJ 190.15 HY 102.98 AE 6.03 BU 48.00 DG 78.06 EX 152.04 GK 190.13 J 17.01 AF 7.01 BV 41.00 DH 78.15 EY 152.03 GL 186.00 JA 136.07 AG 19.00 BW 20.00 DJ 78.12 F 10.02 GM 184.01 JB 136.05 Ali 17.02 BX 46.00 DK 78.13 FA 144.04 GN 184.02 JC 136.1 B AJ 21.00 BY 5200 DL 130.06 FS 144.02 GP 184.03 JD 192.05 AX 16.00 C 22.01 DM 78.11 FC 152.02 GR 181.11 JE 192.06 AL 22.02 CA 51.00 ON 130.05 FD 145.00 GT 174.00 JF 190.12 AM 15.02 C8 50.00 DP 130.05 FE 141.16 GU 172.02 JK 202.98 AN 13.02 CC 62.00 OR 130.06 FF 143.06 GV 181.05 JL 190.23 AP 24.00 co 60.01 OT 130.07 FG 141.15 GW 189.00 JM 203.98 AR 12.01 CE 65.02 DU 127.00 FH 143.02 GX 190.14 JN 134.02 AT 13.01 CF 199.00 DV 126.01 FJ 143.03 GY 190.21 JP 5.00 AU 8.00 CG 65.01 DW 124.00 FK 141.13 H 18.00 JR 172.01 AV 11.01 CH 69.00 DX 125.00 FL 143.05 HA 190.20 K 31.01 AW 2.02 CJ 44.00 DY 122.05 FM 72.01 HB 190.24 L 29.00 AX 7.02 CK 42.00 E 9.00 FN 98.02 HC 192.09 M 35.00 AY 11.02 CL 104.00 EA 178.07 FP 72.02 HO 192.02 N 36.00 B 15.04 CM 102.00 EB 169.01 FR 94.01 HE 192.04 P 78.14 BA 2.01 CN 103.00 EC 87.C6 FT 94.02 HF 136.10 R 141.14 Be 122.03 CP 101.01 ED 87.01 FU 97.02 HG 136.09 T 71.01 BC 83.00 CR 4.01 EF 87.03 FV 96.05 HH 136.08 U 75.02 BD 27.02 CT 198.00 EG 57.00 FW 96.04 HJ 136.15 V 76.03 BE 31.02 e CU 197.00 EH 59.02 FX 134.01 HK 136.14 W 192.08 BF 32.01 CV 194.00 EJ 110.02 FY 133.00 HL 136.13 X 14.00 BG 37.00 CW 195.02 EK 112.0) G 4.05 HM 137.05 Y 39.01 BH 38.00 CX 193.02 EL 111.05 GA 75.01 HN 138.01 BJ 39.02 CY 79.05 EM 111.03 G8 76.02 HP 137.01 BK 40.00 D 10.01 EN 111.04 GC 131.02 HR 141.97 BL 34.00 DA 193.01 EP 11o.o1 GO 190.16 HT 137.04 N II�w Gra.l Toa w E Ca..y .i O.wwrwi. s SOURC: T1GERfUne Hies. 19910 �fP 1137.04 , 1141.01 •� 1139.02 1 1139.01 1137.02 1142.03 1139.03 1138.01 1136.10 1142. 1138.03 1132.07 1132.10 1140.03 EA 1136.09 1135.07 1142.05 114 .01Ll(1 139.04 1138.04 1132.08 / I1140. 1136.12 1136.15 1136.14 1135.08 1087.00 1 1140.01 0.05 1102-0111138.05 113 2.09 13 2.1 1 1136.13 1136.17 1116.16 1135.04 1. 1050.06 1132. CN Cr 11-^5.05 CC 1135.06 1142.02 . 1050.01 134. 36.1 065.08 1104.01 1003.00 32.0 713301 1005'07 134.05 CP 1006.01 1 .00 g8 BC CA C8 co1133.02Cy 1131.01 c\A 1065.09 7137.02 1005.02 BA 1002.02 BE 11 8065.10 1008.02 X BO - d L CJ 7105. cw 1008.00 1130.01 AE 012.0 1012.01 8F 1065.06 1065.11 I ?0 1131.08 C 1131.05 1107.01 1106.01 1217.02 AG AF W gT BU 8X CJ 1217.01 1108.01 1022.01 U 1015.00 1014.01 BV CV ? 1218.00 1051. Y G A 1107.02 a B C Ac BG BH Y073.07 1216.01 CX BY t 223.00 �l EB EC AX 1026.00 AM M J DI i 10 .00 1013.02 Cf1 OL C' � 1023.01 ASgR gp B1N t '4 nn OR 0 1052.0 AY K E F T P 1216.06 1042.01 1063.0 CF DE OJ DM OP U ED BJBL 1115.0 DT 1109.01 EF A AP L M N BM CE 7115.26 -� 1054.05 AN 1048.05ON CG 1115.27 1115.2a OF pK 1.715.11 1108.04 EG AK AV 1048.07 AT AU 1061.0 1216.09 DA 1115 23 1109.0 - AS 7067.02 R 1115.28 120 1115.25 EN 1059.00 1216.7 1 EH EJ OW 1047.00 1115.31 ON EM 1171.01 DB 1115.30 DC 1055.07 EK EL 0 DX 1110.03 1060.02 1111.02 DO 1115.34 1115.33 1115.15 OG 1115.12 1109.08 1055.10 1060.04 t 74'02 1055.08 057. 1060.01 DH 1115.78 1112.02 1114.03 Ot 1110.05 1115.19 1110.06 1060.05 1110.10 1110.08 1113.01 17 13.04 1113.03 1110.08 1112.01 1113.05 11 10.07 1113.06 Tarrant County Map Tarrant County 1990 Census Tracts Reference Table for *Small Tracts A 1031.00 BH 1014.03 CT 1136.16 EB 1052.02 AA 1022.02 BJ 1046.04 CU 1131.04 EC 1052.01 AB 1038.00 BK 1046.02 CV 1216.05 ED 1024.02 AG 1016.00 BL 1046.01 CW 1131.03 EF 1023.02 AD 1011.00 BM 1062.02 CX 1222.00 EG 1109.04 AE 1010.00 BN 1046.03 CY 1136.11 EH 1109.07 AF 1020.00 BP 1036.02 D 1034.00 EJ 1055.06 AG 1021.00 BR 1036.01 DA 1216.10 EK 1055.0@ AH 1007.00 BT 1065.02 DB 1115.32 EL 1055.03 AJ 1106.02 BU 1065.03 DC 1115.16 EM 1055.02 AK 1109.03 BV 1065.14 DD 1115.35 EN 1056.00 AL 1054.03 BW 1115.05 DE 1217.00 F 1039.00 AM 1053.00 BX 1065.12 DF 1115.22 G 1029.00 AN 1042.02 BY 1065.13 DG 1115.14 H 1028.00 AP 1043.00 C 1033.00 DH 1115.17 J 1030.00 AR 1048.02 CA 1049.00 DJ 122B.00 K 1041.00 AT 1045.03 CB 1102.02 DK 1115.21 L 1044.00 AU 1045.01 Cc 1101.01 DL 1211.00 M 1045.02 AV 1054.04 CD 1101.02 OM 1229.00 N 1062.01 AW 1054.06 CE 1216.08 DN 1115.13 P 1037.02 AX 1024.01 CF 1226.00 DP 1219.01 R 1064.00 AY 1025.00 CG 1115.29 DR 1220.00 T 1037.01 B 1032.00 CH 1225.00 DT 1130.02 U 1019.00 BA 1004.00 CJ 1216.04 DU 1219.02 V 1017.00 B8 1104.02 CK 1131.07 DV 1058.00 W 1018.00 BC 1002.01 CL 1131.06 DW 1055.05 X 1009.00 BO 1001.02 CM 1134.03 OX 1057.01 Y 1027.00 BE 1001.01 CN 1134.04 DY 1057.03 BF 1065.07 CP 1134.07 E 1040.00 BG 1014.02 CR 1136.07 EA 1139.05 N /Nw 0. W Tam W E Cwwd�I G.wrb S SOUP.CE: 71GER/Line Fisc. 1990 Denton County 1990 Census Tracts i 201.01 202.00 -1 2019.01 05.01 M '80205.02 .. 204.02 264.0 206.02 R p212.00 201.02 .00 214.01 213.0 203.01 214.02 21 0.1 215.04 215.07 217.06 �Q1 r 315.02 2-Z OR d� - 217.06 0 217.03 316.01 Siete < F E 21&Q3 216.04 I 3217401 216.06 203.02 L 217.09 217 M R J H Reference Table for Small Tracts A 207.00 0 217.11 N 206.01 6 213.01 H 216.10 P 211.00 C 215.05 J 216.09 R 209.00 0 217.07 K 216.06 T 210.00 r E 217.13 L 216.07 F 217.12 M 216.11 SOURCE TIOERtir Fia 1990 Denton County Map N 25% TROPHY CLUB DR. Not to Scale yORTy114T ywY ` r ° ��o� t���q�o psi � RF to° �' Fk0 sa 1l, ° ON 0 0 0 � � t 15% Sp% (� 3% ' 5% 3% 2% �N o Subject Site x0l T OOQ h m N N So � 2oo e��o n 4-5% ' 1% Z 3%� 2°i° mon ° 3% DOVE LN. 2% 114 U) 65 D to 0 2 O O r 4% 3% North Development Site-Generated Trips Road Runner T/A DeShazo, Tang& Associates, Inc. July 9, l 998 N 25% TROPHY CLUB DR. Not to Scale �OR77ywFST oto r70 0 ` too ` tS° 1 `�200 RRk�R 1 40% 20% /o 10%y • �� Z r 8%1 Co o� Subject v%� Site x Opo k, m Cr. 1 4% e<Vp67 z -i sio 2% 1% o Z 3%� m 0 DOVE LN. 2% % 114 65% 1%� D K to n S O O r 4% 3% South Development Site-Generated Trips Road Runner T/A DeShazo, Tang& Associates, Inc. July 9, 1998 "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 10, 1998 Appendix D Traffic Volume Data DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. intomatel 'Tr< e CQun ':: ": DeShai o, Tang & Associates, Inc. Street: SH-114 Location: 600 feet east of Trophy Club Dr rz- City/State: Westlake, Texas • Project-[])#: 9812-2 - 078 Date: July 1, 1998 ... Day of Weer: Wednesday Data Source: DT&A a. 24-Hour Volume: 36,4381 aw .ao am 000 1� ram I.= Time Peak R. sf »ad Westbound Time Peak Eastbound Westbound 1200 r 13 44 77 1215 247 225 34 23 51 1230 242 212 i 26 53 1245 232 258 34 127 34 215 1300 234 955 226 921 32 29 1316 235 230 21 43 1336: 237 254 .;....ate:: 22 32 1345' 225 200 22 97 20 124 1400' 234 931 247 931 3`E>21S'' 14 24 i4]5 252 291 230 20 24 1430 227 242 245 27 15 1445 290 251 300: 35 96 22 85 1500 238 1,007 268 1,052 8#3`I 24 25 1515 286 264 330 18 24 1530 263 307 3t5 32 26 1545: 278 278 4110 24 98 21 96 £600:: 268 1,095 371 1,220 4113 56 20 1615': 257 385 430` 45 18 1630: 233 428 44S:I 63 24 16451 228 400 300 77 241 36 98 1700 234 952 437 1,650 513 110 49 1715 264 539 5311 152 73 1730 271 511 545 185 118 1745 297 483 b00 260 707 102 342 1800 3,132 280 1,112 ' 487 2,020 ' 613 299 152 1815 — 241 418 630 390 154 1830 216 409 645 455 185 1845 190 355 700 419 1,563 185 676 19001 150 797 322 1,504 :713 411 207 1975'I 188 305 T30 426 228 19301' 168 226 145 442 314 1945 143 214 800 493 1,772 ' 253 1,002 2000 143 642 240 985 813 2,787 402 1,763 229 1,024 201 5} 127 192 830 361 186 2030 101 182 845' 346 229 2w, 107 154 900 343 1,452 187 831 2100 115 450 156 684 913 270 176 2115: 114 137 93(1 267 253 Z130'' 87 158 945' 238 199 2145!' 118 147 1000 268 1,043 199 827 'j.pQ: 97 416 144 586 1013: 228 197 3` :5 75 106 1931! 228 218 5p 70 140 4045 256 214 . 66 115 1100 259 971 230 859 2300< 37 248 95 456 1113 270 247 231s 53 114 1130 227 223 2930: 60 96 1145 269 211 2345 47 85 1200 273 1,039 226 907 2so0f 57 217 44 339 Directional Volumes 18,028 18,410 SRP '= 24-Hour Volume 36,438 S 'Yh417S DO, R11 ;c ;SSQC , I1G suur. SH-114 Lmation: 6010 feet east of Trvpby Club Dr cstyistacc: Westlake, Texas rrou�-mv: 98122-078 1. Street Width: Eastbound 39.5o feet Westbound 13.3o feet Including shoulders: 39.50' Median: 358.00 feet 2. Street Material: Eastbound: Concrete; Westbound: Aspbalt 3. Curbing/Gutters?: Eastbound: Concrete; Westbound: Open Drainage 4. Number of Lanes: S (FB--3; WB---2) 5. Divided?: Yes 6. Traffic Control Devices: Intersection Traffic Signals at Tropby Club Dr 7. Pedestrian Crosswalks?: NO 8. Pedestrian Pushbutton?: No 9. On-street Parking: Unmarked 10. Posted Speed Limit: SS mph 11. Adjacent Land Uses: Undeveloped . 12. Additional Observations/Comments: into ated Traffic Count DeShazo, Tang & Associates, enc. suw: Tropby Club Drive Location: 240 feet north of SH-114 ciryisutc: Westlake, Texas Project-mw: 98122 - 082 D.tc: July 1, 1998 D.y of Week: Wednesday Dau So=c: DMA b 0 on .•DD <m 400 �O .00 1000 11100 1100 1O 1100 24-Hour Volume: S,80S Northbou3ulhbound Time Peak Northbound Southbound 240(1 120D -1S 4 4 ;x1215 40 65 30 1 5 1230 50 46 45 5 2 1245 45 59 100 1 it 1 12 1300 51 186 76 246 ' 113 1 1 1315 436 55 201 54 235 130 4 3 3330 31 53 145 3 1 1345 52 47 200 3 11 0 5 1400 61 199 48 202 21S 4 0 1415 47 65 230' 3 0 3430 39 55 1 2 1445 52 54 3i16 2 10 0 2 150034 172 34 208 0 a '515 48 44 330 2 3 1530 46 53 345 2 1 1545 44 58 40D 3 7 3 7 1600 39 177 37 192 415 0 0 1615 50 51 430 3 2 1630 53 42 40 0 2 I64S 29 41 500 0 3 6 10 1700 41 173 36 170 533 2 8 1715 46 5o 530 5 6 1730 67 40 345 7 11 _;'1745 62 36 600 _ 16 _3016 41 1800' 52 227_ 42 168 613 9 23 r Isis 416 70 251 47 --- 165 630 5 23 1830 50 39 w 23 43 I845' 62 41 C10 24 61 47 136 1900 68 250 35 162 • >13 20 59 1415: 36 32 37 77 3930; 36 36 34 70 Igo:. 38 19 E'? 3E 129 73 279 2000 46 156 31 118 423 34143 60 280 20JS': 36 28 ? ' Qi 35 61 2030>. 33 18 E45> 46 60 2045' 27 24 900 44 159 52 233 2100` 28 124 22 92 915` 45 55 2115' 29 32 930' 36 171 43 2130ff 24 30 *3l5 41 38 2145' 29 31 1000 j 37 159 62 198 2200' 24 106 14 107 101$1 36 35 2235' 14 10 1030 33 47 2230` 13 8 1045 25 62 2245' 10 12 1100 37 131 46 190 2300 11 48 7 37 1113 38 53 2375 15 8 1130' 45 55 2330 5 10 f145 56 47 2345 12 4 1200 46 195 62 217 24001 3 35 2 24 Directional Volumes 2,749 1 3,056 24-Hour Volume 5,805 .......... Str@P� ��lSa Y ()QS DeShaZO, Tang & SOC12te5, Cnc. strut: Tropby Club Drive Location: 240 feet north of SH-114 cityistatc: Westlake, Texas P.;ut-IDK: 98122 —082 I. Street Width: Northbound: 23.25 feet Southbound: 35.25 feet Median: 19.92 feet 2. Street Material: Concrete 3. Curbing/Gutters?: Concrete 4. Number of Lanes: 4 • 5. Divided?: Yes 6. Traffic Control Devices: Intersection Traffic Signals at SH-114 7. Pedestrian Crosswalks?: No S. Pedestrian Pushbutton?: No 9. On-street Parking: Unmarked 10. Posted Speed Limit: 30 mph 11. Adjacent Land Uses: (1) Commercial (2)Residential. Single-family (3) Undeveloped 12. Additional Observations/Comments: • A►uto�aad Traffic Count DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc. street: Precinct Line Rd Location: 294 feet south of -� SH-114 cityisute: Westlake, Texas ! ,� Project-M#: 98122 - 083 Y "° Dau: July 1, 1998 Day of Week: Wednesday b Data source: DT&A ,o a saw 8. a` M. am m a00 800 1000 Law 1. 1a00 1a00 .000 24-Hour Vol..: 2,467 c Y .—'aM:.f r- • MY X60— . .... .. >:::o- ... ... �i�tF. .� Qk EbOW� ►�LIY�ONII .> TImBI. Q[ i IXiad; it : MOB:' 3200:: 15 2 2 124523 20 30' a 1 3230 17 25 45 5 2 1245 11 20 1310 1 16 2 7 1300 11 62 26 91 IiS 3 1 1315: 23 18 Y3(i 2 0 5330:; 13 18 145 0 0 .34S 17 18 200 1 6 1 2 1400 12 65 22 76 4 1 1415 19 14 yE@ 1 0 1430 17 14 4 0 I445 Il 19 1 10 0 1 1500 11 58 22 69 tE ; 0 0 1515 13 12 330: 2 3 1530 15 20 30 0 0 I545 14 28 4418 0 2 0 3 1600 28 70 18 78 41$'; 1 0 :1675'' 30 20 a30` 2 0 1630:: 16 24 445` 0 0 1W 17 24 SOD 1 4 0 0 "I700> 30 93 19 87 5Y5 0 1 1715: 3126 530 3 0 1730' 47 25 $0 1 4 1745' 243 37 145 28 98 600' 2 6 4 9 1800 27 142 21 100 6Y5 S A 7 �:'18151; - 29 ---- 24 --- — - 630 5 7 ia30; 17 18 5 16 22 1845:: 27 6412 700 18 47 32 68 1900' 13 86 15 69 71S 13 36 1915: 17 9 ?3(Y 12 41 19301 29 17 :I45 21 45 i94S:: 12 7 NCO is 64 57 179 20001 12 70 14 47 813 253 16 67 43 186 2015.: 11 8 a30 18 73 31 2030` 10 10 a45 14 287 6 900 15 63 34 136 210032045 12 40 12 36 915 7 20 2:115'' 8 6 430 19 17 2230'' 12 9 945' 17 21 2145 10 5 1000 23 66 11 69 2200 3 33 7 27 10i'G 13 17 2215 9 4 Yt13D:; 7 12 Z'301' 4 7 1013:; 10 15 2245: 2 6 I10M 9 39 13 57 2300'' 2 17 2 19 1115 13 15 2315: 5 6 Y33Q; 16 14 23301. 1 0 i1 38 18 230: 2 4 > 1200`: 1 22 89 1 20 67 1 2400: 1 9 3 13 Directional Volumes 1,ts7 1,310 .................:::::;; 5 24 How Volume 2.467 ::iiiiij ipiii;ii;:yi;x<;o ' �7FS 'YIODS �C$ ZO, Tall53C?C1Elxe�, InC. strut: Precinct Line Rd t.a,tioo: 294 feet south of SH-114 cityist,t.: Westlake, Texas r.j.t-IDK: 98122 -083 1. Street Width: 23.50 feet 2. Street Material: Asphalt 3. Curbing/Gutters?: Open Drainage 4. Number of Lanes: 2 5. Divided?: NO 6. Traffic Control Devices: Intersection Traffic Signals at SH-114 7. Pedestrian Crosswalks?: No S. Pedestrian Pushbutton?: No 9. On-street Parking: Unmarked 10. Posted Speed Limit: Unmarked 11. Adjacent Land Uses: here 12. Additional Observations/Comments: p_ pp AA yw1 y� A W y b � °p• w A J OJe w O� 0 ► W A W A U ♦ pp�. N U W v] N O OD W O lUi� OD A `O A A A 10 A W W O� 00 U 00 W N N r• N N r r r O r. U O. W W . OW N A W .(� bJ J N U � Jpp pNp.. pp, tilltlw �c 1NI C• P O O P M Y ♦ O P • • 4 -- M M w w .» M .. w M M .. w M r 8 NN�,} NN N♦,� �,} [N� ��..jj ��..jj w M M w� w M ....... id� W N U ♦Nit r P O � 1D b o• �0 J J .�. O� 4� U U P A w w W W w � M v. w "' lot..... .. ......... W D y^ 00 N �1 �. ""' 1.1 A .-• N N N N Y W W y W U O� OD �O oe r N p� J N In A �O po r ► P O O. U OIn O N N O. J O W N U W J OD NO `O 10 : V A ,^ ry W JFS jrJ�� y J N O ON T N J Oo N �O O OAo A A A A A W W U A A U In T U oo �D O �p 10 `O E W U U O. .•+ J O O. W W r pp J A OD O. OD A U U J O. O J W O U N W - O. U Lj on O P VIM eacv oar .:> ::>:::>:::<:>:,::::::<:» SII43OC , L1G street: "kwwd Blvd Location: 290 fleet west of SH-114 City/Sute: Westlake, Texas Project-mgr: 98122-079 1. Street Width: Eastbound 35.17 feet Westbound 35.ob feet Median: 37.25 feet 2. Street Material: Concrete 3. Curbing/Gutters?: Concrete 4. Number of Lanes: 6 S. Divided?: Yes 6. Traffic Control Devices: i-way Stop at SH-114 Service Rd "Eastbound" 7. Pedestrian Crosswalks?: No 8. Pedestrian Pushbutton?: NO 9. On-street Parking: Unmarked 10. Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph 11. Adjacent Land Uses: (1) Commercial: Office&Retail; (2) Undeveloped 12. Additional Observations/Comments: ...........- .......... ............. .......... . ........... ............ ............ F3 4t- .... ...... E�1p 0 0 — 000 — — — cio 0 0 — 0 — 0 4 o � " � _ _ sasaae6 � "segs € � � ........ .... - - - - - - - - - - - - Z; Z;; 10 j3 OJD 91 tw 00 X XXX.t' Obsp 440ns DCS�0, Tang sociates,;.II1C. str=t: Sam School Road Location: 127 feet south of Kirkwood Blvd city/state: Westlake, Texas Pjct-m#: 98122 -080 1. Street Width: 46.92 feet 2. Street Material: Concrete 3. Curbing/Gutters?: Concrete 4. Number of Lanes: 4 5. Divided?: No 6. Traffic Control Devices: One-way Stop at Kirkwood Blvd 7. Pedestrian Crosswalks?: Yes 8. Pedestrian Pushbutton?: No 9. On-street Parking: Unmarked 10. Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph 11. Adjacent Land Uses: (1) Commercial: Office&Retail; (2) Undeveloped 12. Additional Observations/Comments: Win, g& ss �Its,:Lac i Location: Kirkwood Blvd&SH-114 Exit Romp 'Westbound' Date/Day: July 7-8, 1998/Tuesday-Wednesday City/State: Westlake, Teras County: Torrent Data Source: DMA Traffic Control: Unsigna&ed Data Collector(s): C. Blaine Rodgers Project-IDX: 98122-A Conditions: Hot&Dry :::,:::: SH- 114 EB Exit Romp K KirkwoodB/vd usvr� 6D 6D .... ..... 1,0> 2 1 1 3 3 1 Mwute Hopi::;<`<< ><:>: otu... Irv.:'::.:. F40 7>15 75 0 41 9 21 0 75 0 221 ............................. "€R7« 84 0 57 15 22 0 81 1 260 :....:.............................. O'130' 4Ts 149 4 66 5 37 0 61 0 322 47:45 08 OQ 202 3 104 13 44 0 66 2 434 1,237 1$a9::::::::::d$:1.5:::< 148 1 130 13 55 1 67 2 417 1,433 + 82.55% Q8`1QR.30'; 171 8 114 10 41 0 56 1 401 1,574 AMP...... i►r.::::. >:::. .. 2..::.:::::::....5...,...... 57.. .:.::.............. .. ................. : .:::::..::.:::.... :..:.:; . . .....:::..::.::.::...... ....................................................... ............:..:...::::::.::.....::::.::::::.::::::.:. .:..........4b.............l.S6................. .. ............................275................5. ........1.+1�. : :: ::.:::.:::..::::::.:. ..........................::::::: :......:.......:.. ..::..:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:................ ........................................................ ...........r............................:.....:....:...:.....:...:. �yiL•-1�����}�, Y ::5iS::YiY:f::�:i :•i:?iiiiY.,i"': .:::::::::::::::::::::::::.�:.�:::::::.�:.�::::::::::is :.iii::.:: >;: :55i5;5.^•%c:;G:i:i:liiii:::>::i:::;:i':: .;v.; .::::::........... 55555555;: :::.. ..::::.�.�:i:::::::: ::::::::.:::::: :.::.y:5t:::5::::::::::::::.:�.�::::::::::.:_:::. :.:a:. :....................................................::. :5::<i:i:o:ai:i;' :;•;::•>::r.:r.v:i:i: :r.:r.>::;ii:>::::: :. v:::::::::::::::'::.::. /r17.7. ...:....:.:.�LO.V..:::.:::;rG.r..:...:.. ....:::.....::::::::................................................ :: 6::: :<::i::<. : ::.:.:.:: Q�t 1� .... QQ a ::::.:::.::::::.:.":5:55'5555555.':.':5:::::: :::::.�:::::::::::. ................. ..... ... ...... ... _ .._ req i .... ..... ::i:;;'`ii:. .r :iii i:;ia:i:i:i:ii:i:ii:.:::.. ..................................... ................................ .....................::.......................:.. ..:.:.22i+k46.............1�6........V.�.. �yQ qq�/..:.::::.:■■�'.5 '::;::i::;::i::i::i::i:.:::.:; 5...........::::•::�i:•i::.i:.ii:.::i:.i::.i::.>ii::.i: ..................................... .....................,...:.......:::::::::::::::::::::: :.. ..:................................................. .... .::..::::::::::::::::::::7 V�A�'.7p.:..:.:.:.l.�...... .:.:' :.. .::is::::.::::::: ;:: ...r..:.. - ':::::2G:a:5'S5555 .. .. >'...: ::::.<.:::>:::::>::i:;':::.:>::::i,; , .:::i::5 ::>:::>::::>:::::::; ::....:::: :::>::: ::::<:>:::::::>>::::::: 88:54% E%.i:.;:.:: S. :: 102.G9&::5:;:::1S2.S 1T«4t3;;; «1S'> 23 15 44 99 17 0 121 9 328 30 20 7 40 96 16 0 129 10 318 1.T.,.30 :.:1T+ES ;; 14 15 40 64 15 1 115 4 268 .........................:. ....... .................................... 34 10 36 41 11 0 122 8 262 1,176 + 89.63% :>::>::5.;.::::: .::::.. ..X;::.::.:::::.::.:i:.i:.i:.::.. ::.i:..... . :.. g1.::..........4?:::>:::>::> .... ... .:............. ............. .;:.....::.:::.:.......:::::::.. 00:.............59................t.. ............................4$x..............3.1.. ........ .I/6. ........................... ..................................................... 2i;::r:f�'J:is�i:2:::�:�i:�::;::;�: `;:; �iyi::i: TOtaI/D<i:is;:i:i::i.:;:;:;:;:;: ♦.... 1LOCt1071........ ":......i:v is ::::.�::.>:iii:>:i:a: ..........................:::i:o;:ii:ai:i:: ::::::: ::::.>:.:..::::::::.�::::.:::�::::,.:::::::> :;;:pi:5'45:4:4:;:i;:; i:i:ai:a:i::.i:i::;i:i:: .;.: 5 i:;:ii5:` ...5: ::55ii:::5:5: 4:::45::::5:;:55:`55:i::5:5 ::.i:a:i>i>::::C::55;: :.:.�:::.::.......:::.. . :::::::::::::.�::::::::::::::::::: o: 5555:4:;';:i' i:::5:L:4: >:>:2:.:;:;:;:;>:;c.i:;;:;: ... .:::::..................:... >:•>;.>i::aa.H.t:::.�. ::::::::::::::.�:::::::::.�::::::::: ..... _ �:w vii%. :::.�r:x:+::nisi:.:;:;;.;>:.;. :.::::: .........................518..... .... Tiltil :i:'.'<iii 55i;:;::.i;`.`.;...' "'' ' .:i':ii:i:i:.ii iii' "5 iii:'.:..:. .' ::i::�..................:: ::is:::i::::i:::i:::i::::i:::i::i;:;5:i':;:j:::::;.i'':i::::::':::i::: .. :.. ..... : t',i.;::::.;. - of>r,i S:::i:5i:% 5551': �A 5%;:: 15X96 5357 Sa,3%::.i::'.16 4 0 3 ..:.. ... .... ..::rJ4:t196::55...: 6:Q ::::5:::::::<:;:.'S:<:5:4 5,:: ::5:<.55;:::5::: :::<:5i:.>:::.:::.:>.. PeakHaur.Ender : 66 96:; 7E 3;y6. 100U 7 $% ...$G8'/6 25,0 94 496If He: A27(21RS.WK1 Observations: ie d C lSP 3405 DZO, T12g A.SSOCIatS, Locatio Kirkwood Blvd& SH-114 Service Road "Westbound" city state: Westlake, Texas Projoct Number: 98122 A Maps,co: Fort Worth 11 Q bt,.hinc k Mewl(F'3i e:06S ERVEi.WK1) 1. Street Material North Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp Concrete Asphalt Other: South Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Concrete a Asphalt Other: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete a Asphalt Other: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete Asphalt Other: Leg: Concrete Asphalt a Other: 2. Curbing/Gutters? North Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp F71 Concrete Asphalt a Open Drainage South Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Concrete Asphalt a Open Drainage East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete Asphalt Open Drainage West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete Asphalt Open Drainage Leg: Concrete Asphalt Open Drainage 3. Number of Lanes North Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp 2 4 6 8 Other: South Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp 2 3 4 6 8 Other: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd 2 3 48 Other: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd 2 3 4 6 8 Other: Leg: 2 3 4 6 8 Other: 4. Divided? North Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp Yes No South Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Yes No East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd � Yes No West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Yes No Leg: g Yes No 5. Street Width North Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp NB/SB: / Median: South Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp NB/SB: / Median: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd EB/WB: / Median: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd EB/WB: / Median: fig: Median: 6. Traffic Control Devices Intersection Traffic Control Signals Approximate Signal Cycle Length: Left/Right Turn Provisions: B.y(yt:Lor R Left Turn Protection North Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp Protected Unprotected South Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Left/Right Protected Unprotected East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Left Protected Unprotected West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Right Protected Unprotected Leg: Protected Unprotected Stop Sign(s) (#of Ways): 1 2 3 ) 4 5 Other: Which legs are controled by STOP signage? All Approaching Traffic U.d U atXons. `>>_ eShazQ,.'fang & A..SS(?C11 10 7. Pedestrian Crosswalks? a Yes No Pedestrian Traffic: © Negligible E:] Light a Moderate a Heavy Pedestrian Pushbutton? a Yes [Z] No S. On-street Parking North Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp F Yes, Marked a No Fvl Unmarked Designated Times: South Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp a Yes, Marked a No FV71 Unmarked Designated Times: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd a Yes, Marked 1:1 No F�7] Unmarked Designated Times: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd F_I Yes, Marked a No OUnimarked Designated Times: Leg: a Yes, Marked a No a Unmarked Designated Times: 9. Posted Speed Limit North/South Legs: SH-114 Entrance Ramp 20 25 30 35 40 g5 50 55 Other: Unmarked East/West Legs: Kirkwood Blvd 20 25 3035 40 45 50 55 Other: F7Unmarked Leg(s): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Other: E] Unmarked 10. Other Observations/Comments •Adjacent Land Useage: (1) Commercial (2) Undeveloped 11. Geometrical Sketch of Intersection I � f I a I Page 2 of: 98122-A I R: oasExva.wta ................. ........... .. .. ....... ............... .......... ............ . ..rirs V. Location: Kirkwood Blvd& SH-114 Exit Ramp 'Eastbound Date/Day; July 7-9, 1999 Tuesday-Wednesday City/State: Westlake, Texas County: Tarrant Data Source: DT&A Traffic Control: Unsignalized Data Collector(s): Linda Sue Kendrick Project-IM: 98122-B Conditions: Hot&Dry .... ....... ....... ......... .... ................... . .... . . . ....... ....... ............. ................. .w. 0, -S 114 Exit Ramp H Kirkwood Blvd Kirkwood Blvd > :>:: ... 3U 6D 6D Fifte"n .. ... ....... ....... ............... UOUnt 1.0> 1 1 3 <0 0> 3 <0 Minute quc puc ..... ............. ............. Thru Submak OTOO 07:15 14 0 22 15 22 72 87 232 07:15 1 07:30 23 0 46 14 17 58 100 258 07:30 07:45 23 0 72 21 19 52 163 350 07:45 08:00 16 0 109 24 27 47 192 415 1,255 WOO 08:15 43 0 183 40 45 63 183 557 1,580 0 70.92% ........... ........... .......I...... ..... . ....... ................. ............ ......................... ,.6.6........................ .......................... .......................... ........................ .... ...... ...... ................ ......... ............... .......... ................. ..................... .............................................. ...... 99 ........ ....... AM NA Hour: 1 5 0 108 220 631 ............................ . . ......... 0 . ... ................................ .............................................. .......... .... . ...........................-6...... ........ 515 207 --- 858 ................................. .............................................. .. . . ................................. .......... .............. ............>:»>::>:>:>::»;;»::::»::;:<:::»::»::>::>:. . ... %Turn ............ .............. 20A% 0.0% 79�6%1 47.8% 52,2% 25,6% 74AV. .......... .. ... ............ ........................ ....... ....................... ............................... ................. ........ ............ ............................... ............................... ........... X.. .......... ... .................... ...... ................%X...................... - 61.0% 0,0% 56,0% 135.;196 . ................ ........... ............... . ..... Peak flour F ................. il,9% 60,0%1 871% ...... .............. ............ ......... .... .............. ................ ................. .................. ................ .............. .......... MOO ::.:*:I ,tS 3 0 5 128 118 107 44 405 17:15 17:36 11, 9 0 10 lot 220 104 44 488 17,30 MO 8 0 9 64 135 83 32 331 17:45 18:00 11 0 25 44 110 110 44 344 1,568 0 80.33% ............. ... ................. PM Peak tku" 31 0 49 ............. ................ .. ...... ..... .. ..... .............. :.:........5$ : 404 1154 -.............. ... ......... . .. .................. ..... 4.......... ...... —............... ....... ...... .. ..... ................ ............................................ ....... .... . ........ ................................. ........................................ ...... ..... ....... ........... I I..............................-'..+.............................................. ::::......I I... .......... ....... ........... ToWtDiroction 80 .................................. . ............................................. .................. .............. ..... .......... ................ ..................... ...... ..................... ......... .............................. :'-XI::::::' :::::;::'* ............................................ %Turn 3868% OM% 61.3% ....... .............................................. 71A 28.9 .... ...... 94,4% 912% Nak.Haur Facto70, 0,O'k 49,0% ...... —....... Fic AMIMMKI .......... ..... ................... Observationsi 0.Field J�selrvations DeShazo, Tang & Associates, Inc. Loceem: Kirkwood Blvd& SH-114 Service Road "Eastbound" C'tty/state: Westlake, Texas Project Number. 98122—B Mapsco: Fort Worth 11 P NI-hine k M--J(Ak:OBSERVE3.WK1) 1. Street Material North Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Concrete Asphalt a Other: South Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp Concrete Asphalt a Other: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete Asphalt Other: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete Asphalt a Other: Leg: Concrete Asphalt Other: 2. Curbing/Gutters? North Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Concrete a Asphalt Open Drainage South Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp Concrete a Asphalt Open Drainage East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete Asphalt Open Drainage West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Concrete Asphalt Open Drainage Leg: a Concrete Asphalt a Open Drainage 3. Number of Lanes North Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp 2 3 4 6 8 Other: South Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp 2 4 6 8 Other: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd 2 3 4 6 8 Other: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd 2 3 4 6 8 Other: Leg: 2 3 4 6 8 Other: 4. Divided? North Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Yes F,71 No South Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp a Yes No East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd FV7 Yes No West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd 71 Yes a No Leg: a Yes No 5. Street Width North Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp NB/SB: / Median: South Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp NB/SB: / Median: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd EB/WB: / Median: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd EB/WB: / Median: Leg: Median: 6. Traffic Control Devices Intersection Traffic Control Signals Approximate Signal Cycle Length: Left/Right Turn Provisions: a.y(.)t: L or R Left Turn Protection North Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Left/Right Protected Unprotected South Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp Protected Unprotected East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Right Protected Unprotected West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd Left Protected Unprotected Leg: Protected Unprotected Stop Sign(s) (il of Ways): 1 2 0 4 5 F-1 Other: Which legs are controled by STOP signage? All Approaching Traffic > d C} sevacos :. eShao, At &:Assocna , enc. 7. Pedestrian Crosswalks? 0 Yes FVINo Pedestrian Traffic: FZI Negligible = Light = Moderate a Heavy Pedestrian Pushbutton? Yes IZI No B. On-street Parking North Leg: SH-114 Exit Ramp Yes, Marked No F7] Unmarked Designated Times: South Leg: SH-114 Entrance Ramp = Yes, Marked a No FV71 Unmarked Designated Times: East Leg: Kirkwood Blvd a Yes, Marked a No FlUnmarked Designated Times: West Leg: Kirkwood Blvd a Yes, Marked No � Unmarked Designated Times: Leg: Yes, Marked a No a Unmarked Designated Times: 9. Posted Sueed Limit North/South Legs: SH-114 Exit Ramp 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Other: EEI Unmarked East/West Legs: Kirkwood Blvd 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Other: = Unmarked Leg(s): 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Other: a Unmarked 10. Other Observations/Comments *Adjacent Land Useage: (1) Commercial (2) Undeveloped 11. Geometrical Sketch of Intersection bJ60 .a�✓® -11 Page 2 of: 98122-B r Fae: oss©tva.w�a "Road Runner" TIA in Westlake July 10, 1998 ;Appendix E Analysis Results DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Map - Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 10, 1998 SH 114 WS SerA Road SH,EB Serv,oe Road S Q M 1j g 4 wB pa r 11lce 2M 4 f e ryQ! oad -50 o Q 0 ey d � 0_ Y / Road Runner �WB Sen'ioe SMRoad I `B d Sa ,r1M,00Bo"we,rrtl B� rti ce Road a A 0 C E m Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH&SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 11Dta-51dta5-c1DT&A198122 Road Runner TlA1p1am.sy5 Timing Plan: Default SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 79 1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 39% 7-101998 Queues © Ffl Fr-1 H Fq Fi�] FT-1 5&1 © � fl Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 0 5504 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 1863 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5504 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 1863 0 Volume (vph) 0 1765 193 0 0 0 0 36 82 0 347 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2267 0 0 0 0 0 38 86 0 365 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 33 33 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.55 0.35 0.35 0.35 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3002 644 547 644 V/C Ratio 0.76 0.06 0.16 0.57 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.41 0.02 0.05 0.20 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.3 9.1 9.5 11.1 Platoon Factor 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 Webster's St Delay 6.6 9.1 9.5 12.0 LOS B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.61 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.5 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 2 4 t 71 22. x.� T 8 Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH & SES Page 1 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 7/9!1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7!10'1998 Queues aa000 © [fl Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1523 0 0 3569 0 1770 3725 Flt Perm. 0.972 0.756 Satd. Flow (perm) 1523 0 0 3569 0 1408 3725 Volume (vph) 69 0 53 65 26 149 391 Lane Group Flow (vph) 129 0 0 99 0 157 433 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 20 20 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 647 1517 598 1583 V/C Ratio 0.20 0.07 0.26 0.27 V/S Ratio Prot 0.08 V/S Ratio Perm 0.03 0.11 0.12 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.5 5.2 5.6 5.7 Platoon Factor 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 2.8 5.2 5.7 5.7 LOS A B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 40 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.20 Intersection V/C Ratio. 0.24 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road 4 77, 6 � g Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 71/9'1998 Site �r'600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3°0 7 10'1998 Queues a © ooa0000 © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 190D 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 x1900 1900 9900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5532 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 1770 3725 0 Fit Perm. 0.950 0.998 0.950 0.950 0.914 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5532 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 1703 3725 0 Volume (vph) 95 1752 103 0 0 0 0 14 19 187 137 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2257 0 0 0 0 0 16 20 197 151 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 30 30 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.54 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2987 1266 538 579 1266 V/C Ratio 0.76 0.01 0.04 0.34 0.12 V/S Ratio Prot 0.41 V/S Ratio Perm 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.8 8.3 8.4 9.4 8.6 Platoon Factor 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.16 Incr. Delay, d2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.7 8.3 8.4 11.2 10.0 LOS A B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.52 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.60 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.6 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 4 20 T8 Phase I AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 3 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues © a0000a Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 5493 0 0 5560 1770 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.889 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5493 0 0 4968 1770 0 1583 Volume(vph) 140 18 70 664 168 0 30 Lane Group Flow(vph) 183 0 0 850 177 0 32 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 28 28 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.38 0.38 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2746 2484 673 602 V/C Ratio 0.07 0.34 0.26 0.05 V/S Ratio Prot 0.10 V/S Ratio Perm 0.03 0.17 0.02 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 4.9 5.7 8.1 7.4 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.2 4.9 6.9 6.3 LOS A A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.27 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.31 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.1 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road 2 Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 4 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 719, 1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues oa0000000aaa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5141 0 0 5521 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.785 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5141 0 0 4387 0 Volume (vph) 111 0 435 0 0 0 0 105 119 233 711 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 62 61 458 0 0 0 0 260 0 0 1093 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 22 22 20 8 28 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.34 0.50 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 673 602 1748 2307 V/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.76 0.15 0.47 V/S Ratio Prot 0.04 0.03 0.05 V/S Ratio Perm 0.29 0.05 0.19 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.6 7.6 10.3 8.7 5.9 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.1 Webster's St Delay 7.6 7.6 14.2 8.7 3.4 LOS B B B B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 3 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.48 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 2y4 rq �4 ,F ,� w; `` 6 i. 7 '� g Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 7%911998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7"10,'1998 Queues oaoa00000 © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 j1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 3703 1583 1770 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.994 0.561 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 3703 1583 1045 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 137 1039 56 14 95 0 0 187 110 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 1300 59 15 100 0 0 197 116 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 29 29 21 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1926 823 376 671 671 570 V/C Ratio 0.68 0.07 0.04 0.15 0.29 0.20 V/S Ratio Prot 0.35 V/S Ratio Perm 0.04 0.01 0.05 0.11 0.07 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 6.7 4.5 7.9 8.2 8.7 8.4 Platoon Factor 0.52 0.53 0.73 0.70 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay. d2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.2 2.4 5.8 5.8 8.8 8.4 LOS A A B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.46 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.0 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Toe 4,lk 6 T g Phase I AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Pale 6 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues�� © ooaaoo Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Volume (vph) 0 0 347 1197 36 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 365 1323 38 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split (s) 29 29 21 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.36 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 920 1937 637 V/C Ratio 0.40 0.68 0.06 V/S Ratio Prot 0.21 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.36 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 5.5 6.8 8.0 Platoon Factor 0.01 0.01 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.2 0.7 0.0 Webster's St Delay 0.2 0.8 8.0 LOS A A B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.38 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.43 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 0.8 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 8 E5' 8 Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH R. SES Page 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w!600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues aaaooaoFT] o © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +Tt r ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3550 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.458 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3550 1583 853 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 653 8 379 49 168 0 0 292 5 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 378 387 399 52 195 0 0 338 5 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 21 21 8 20 9 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.36 0.36 0.48 0.44 0.34 0.36 0.36 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 637 1278 760 467 1900 2012 570 V/C Ratio 0.59 0.30 0.53 0.11 0.10 0.17 0.01 V/S Ratio Prot 0.21 0.11 0.06 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.19 0.04 0.03 0.06 0.00 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 9.9 8.7 5.5 4.6 8.6 8.3 7.8 Platoon Factor 0.53 0.52 0.39 0.91 0.91 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 1.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 6.3 4.6 2.7 4.2 7.8 8.3 7.8 LOS B A A A B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.31 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.38 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.6 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 037 4 g Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH & SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 7!9/1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% T1 01/199 8 Queues EJ Fq J-1 a © 4] Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 . Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5588 0 1770 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.952 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 5588 0 1773 5588 Volume (vph) 0 0 19 0 0 137 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 20 0 0 144 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.43 0.43 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 754 V/C Ratio 0.03 0.19 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.01 0.08 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.1 5.5 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.3 4.7 LOS A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 40 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.09 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.11 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.6 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & ya 20 � 4 k- r Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Pale 9 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w'600K Office Plus Base Grown at 34.0 7'10 1998 Queues Ffl Eq Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 0 3673 0 3491 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.799 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 0 2977 0 3491 0 Volume (vph) 26 0 4 27 64 0 268 192 Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 0 4 0 99 0 508 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 22 22 8 20 8 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.38 0.48 0.50 0.34 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 760 1558 1187 V/C Ratio 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.43 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.00 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.00 0.03 0.15 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 4.2 5.0 9.7 Platoon Factor 0.50 0.64 1.33 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 Webster's St Delay 3.7 2.7 6.6 9.8 LOS A A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.17 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.20 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 9.0 Intersection LOS. B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road 2 �, 4 E� 3 WTI '717 T 8 7 Phase 1 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 Map-Phase 1 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 10, 1998 SH 114 W,, Service Road SH 114 EBS B e^oe Road a SN 114 WBS v U x 114 fB Road o oed $ a � Y SN 1 Road RUnner B rSN 14 WB�rt'ice Road d BoU1e yaro I 114 fB Sen,oe Road 0 C E A rn Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH & SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 11Dta-51dta5-cIDT&A198122 Road Runner T1A1p1pm.sy5 Timing Plan: Default SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 7'91998 Site wi600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 710 1998 Queues a © ooa0000aoo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5555 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 1863 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5555 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 1863 0 Volume (vph) 0 1266 51 0 0 0 0 159 304 0 119 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1525 0 0 0 0 0 167 320 0 125 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2361 792 673 792 V/C Ratio 0.65 0.21 0.48 0.16 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.27 0.09 0.20 0.07 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.9 5.5 6.3 5.4 Platoon Factor 0.56 0.54 0.55 1.03 Incr. Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.3 3.0 3.9 5.6 LOS A A A B Area Type Other Cycle Length: 40 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.48 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.2 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 2 �, 4 T8 Phase I PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page I DESHAZ-P300 ` Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7!10!1998 Queues aoo ] Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1469 0 0 3614 0 1770 3725 Flt Perm. 0.987 0.389 Satd. Flow(perm) 1469 0 0 3614 0 725 3725 Volume (vph) 39 0 114 349 87 80 90 Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 0 0 482 0 84 100 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 20 20 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 624 1536 308 1583 V/C Ratio 0.26 0.31 0.27 0.06 V/S Ratio Prot 0.11 V/S Ratio Perm 0.13 0.12 0.03 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.6 5.8 5.7 5.2 Platoon Factor 1.00 0.59 0.61 0.54 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 5.7 3.5 3.6 2.8 LOS B A A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 40 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.24 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.29 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 3.8 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road 48 4 4 6 Phase 1 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 791998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% Tl 01998 Queues a © 51141 a © aa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5555 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.996 0.950 0.950 0.749 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5555 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 1395 3725 0 Volume (vph) 87 1129 19 0 0 0 0 94 125 64 26 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1430 0 0 0 0 0 104 132 67 28 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 53 53 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.67 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3703 944 401 353 944 V/C Ratio 0.39 0.11 0.33 0.19 0.03 V/S Ratio Prot 0.26 V/S Ratio Perm 0.03 0.08 0.05 0.01 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 4.3 16.3 17.3 16.7 16.0 Platoon Factor 0.52 1.00 1.00 0.26 0.28 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 2.3 16.3 17.5 4.4 4.6 LOS A C C A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.34 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.37 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.4 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 2 4 r 1.rt ME M r T.. e Phase I PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH &. SES Page 3 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 7,'9'1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 30'0 7'101998 Queues © 51 Fr] F] Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 5409 0 0 5532 1770 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.750 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5409 0 0 4191 1770 0 1583 Volume (vph) 721 196 39 157 17 0 57 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1062 0 0 227 18 0 60 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 38 38 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.32 0.32 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3155 2445 560 501 V/C Ratio 0.34 0.09 0.03 0.12 V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.20 0.05 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 4.9 4.2 10.8 11.1 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.2 3.6 9.2 9.4 LOS A A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.23 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.26 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.4 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road 2 ,s e- Phase 1 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 4 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 7,'9'1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues a © 0Fr] 00000 © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 x1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5046 0 0 5398 0 Flt Perm, 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.814 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5046 0 0 4549 0 Volume (vph) 33 0 52 0 0 0 0 358 650 429 180 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 18 55 0 0 0 0 1167 0 0 705 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 21 21 22 17 39 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.32 0.60 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 531 531 475 1598 2928 V/C Ratio 0.04 0.03 0.12 1.67dr 0.92di V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm 0.03 0.23 0.09 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 11.3 11.3 11.6 13.8 4.2 Platoon Factor 0.68 0.68 0.68 1.00 0.05 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 Webster's St Delay 7.7 7.7 7.9 15.1 0.2 LOS B B B C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.32 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.38 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay. 9.4 Intersection LOS: B dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 2 FJ14 ,7, 7 8 Phase 1 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH & SES Page 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w-'600K Office Plus Base Grokkn at 3% 7'10'1998 Queues a © 00000ao © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 3722 1583 1770 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.999 0.645 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 3722 1583 1201 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 26 2052 154 94 87 0 0 115 64 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 2296 162 99 92 0 0 121 67 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 55 55 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2581 1098 272 422 422 359 V/C Ratio 0.89 0.15 0.36 0.22 0.29 0.19 V/S Ratio Prot 0.62 V/S Ratio Perm 0.10 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 7.0 3.0 18.6 17.9 18.2 17.8 Platoon Factor 0.54 0.54 0.69 0.70 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 3.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 6.9 1.6 13.2 12.5 18.3 17.8 LOS B A B B C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.70 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.7 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 4 s Te Phase 1 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 6 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 7'9 1998 Site w-'600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7101998 Queues © ooaoFT] o Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Volume (vph) 0 0 119 2072 159 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 125 2290 167 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 60 60 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.21 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1261 2654 376 V/C Ratio 0.10 0.86 0.44 V/S Ratio Prot 0.07 0.09 V/S Ratio Perm 061 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 2.7 6.5 20.8 Platoon Factor 0.65 0.65 0.71 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 2.3 0.6 Webster's St Delay 1.8 6.5 15.3 LOS A B C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.71 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road arl yl gig"6 � 8 Phase I PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH & SES Paee 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues o © aooa000 © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations #T+ r ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3632 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.975 0.364 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3632 1583 678 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 103 50 170 318 63 0 0 517 33 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 60 117 179 335 73 0 0 598 35 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 21 21 19 30 9 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.28 0.28 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 531 1090 633 596 2515 1583 449 V/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.28 0.56 0.03 0.38 0.08 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.15 V/S Ratio Perm 0.08 0.10 0.01 0.11 0.02 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 11.5 11.5 7.8 8.5 7.0 13.1 12.0 Platoon Factor 0.83 0.83 0.16 0.92 0.62 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 9.6 9.5 1.4 8.7 4.4 13.2 12.0 LOS B B A B A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.37 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.43 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 9.6 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard t, 34 4 - Sx Phase I PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 79/1998 Site w/600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3% 710`1998 Queues F] Fq M Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5588 0 1770 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.952 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 5588 0 1773 5588 Volume (vph) 0 0 125 0 0 26 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 132 0 0 27 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.43 0.43 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 754 V/C Ratio 0.20 0.04 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.08 0.02 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.5 5.1 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.7 4.3 LOS A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 40 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.10 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.12 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.6 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & 4 8 Phase 1 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 9 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 1 PM Peak Hour 79'1998 Site �r'600K Office Plus Base Grown at 3 7 10'1998 Queues MF oA Pgoo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9. Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 0 3722 0 3569 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.952 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 0 3547 0 3569 0 Volume (vph) 175 0 25 5 261 0 94 36 Lane Group Flow (vph) 184 0 26 0 294 0 144 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 48 48 10 22 10 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.56 0.65 0.36 0.24 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 996 1029 1301 848 V/C Ratio 0.18 0.03 0.23 0.17 V/S Ratio Prot 0.10 0.00 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.01 0.06 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.5 3.1 13.4 18.4 Platoon Factor 0.66 0.55 1.00 0.88 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.3 1.7 13.5 16.2 LOS A A B C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 3 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.17 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.17 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 11.0 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road 2 E� 3 �, 4 49- a- 7 '� g Phase I PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 Map - Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 10, 1998 SH 114 WB Service Road SH 114 EB ServiceC Road Sy 774�,ye � Sy lq S S rce Rod a a CL -je e m° {� 5 Dad O 0 � 3 � Y Kirkwood Boulevard r Sy "Road Runner^ I B �Sy 17 irkwood Boulevard B, m 0 o: 0 0 z U N E M Cn Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH & SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 11Dta-51dta5-c1DT&A198122 Road Runner TIAIp2am-25.sy5 Timing Plan: Default SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7'9 1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7 10 1998 Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5488 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5488 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 3725 0 Volume (vph) 0 2038 272 0 0 0 0 73 176 0 1153 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2675 0 0 0 0 0 77 185 0 1275 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 38 38 28 28 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.53 0.38 0.38 0.38 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2910 706 600 1411 V/C Ratio 0.92 0.11 0.31 0.90 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.49 0.04 0.12 0.34 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 10.8 10.1 11.0 14.7 Platoon Factor 1.00 0.69 0.67 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 3.9 0.0 0.1 6.1 Webster's St Delay 14.7 7.0 7.5 18.6 LOS B B B C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 66 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.83 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.91 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 15.4 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 2 4 Flow- 778 Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 1 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w'0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7 10'1998 Queues oaoFr] 00000 © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1751 0 1770 1710 0 0 3551 0 1770 3573 0 Flt Perm. 0.610 0.924 0.950 0.710 0.545 Satd. Flow (perm) 1136 1751 0 1721 1710 0 0 2534 0 1015 3573 0 Volume (vph) 9 6 4 190 68 83 27 156 69 187 896 341 Lane Group Flow (vph) 9 10 0 200 159 0 0 278 0 197 1367 0 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 27 27 39 39 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.55 0.55 0.55 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 413 637 626 622 1382 554 1949 V/C Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.32 0.26 0.20 0.36 0.70 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.19 0 38 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 10.2 10.2 11.5 11.2 5.8 6.4 8.4 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.35 0.29 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 Webster's St Delay 10.2 10.2 11.6 11.2 4.5 2.4 3.2 LOS B B B B A A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 66 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.50 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.55 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.7 Intersection LOS. A Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road 2 �, 4 27 rk Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH&&. SES Pa-e 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'101998 Queues oaoFr] 00000 © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5454 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.998 0.950 0.950 0.706 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5454 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 1315 3725 0 Volume (vph) 104 2181 391 0 0 0 0 121 140 204 552 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3099 0 0 0 0 0 133 147 215 610 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 45 45 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.65 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3524 974 414 344 974 V/C Ratio 0.88 0.14 0.36 0.63 0.63 V/S Ratio Prot 0.57 V/S Ratio Perm 0.04 0.09 0.16 0.16 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.2 13.9 14.8 16.1 16.1 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 2.1 0.0 0.2 2.5 0.9 Webster's St Delay 9.2 14.0 15.1 18.6 17.0 LOS B B C C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.73 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.81 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 11.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 2 �, 4 5A_ pr T8 Phase 2 AM Peak Hour S}nchro Report CLH& SES Pa-e 3 DESHAZ-P300 ` Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7 9'1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7101998 Queues © 000aao Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 x1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 5471 0 0 5566 1770 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.883 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5471 0 0 4934 1770 0 1583 Volume (vph) 167 27 77 825 243 0 32 Lane Group Flow (vph) 225 0 0 1044 256 0 34 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 33 33 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.35 0.35 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2984 2691 611 547 V/C Ratio 0.08 0.39 0.42 0.06 V/S Ratio Prot 0.14 V/S Ratio Perm 0.04 0.21 0.02 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 4.5 5.5 10.4 9.1 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 Webster's St Delay 3.8 4.7 9.2 7.8 LOS A A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.36 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.40 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.4 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road 2 33 7119 E- 6 8 Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH R SES Page 4 DESHAZ-P300 ` SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7!10/1998 Queues a © aoa0000 © oa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5119 0 0 5527 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.769 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5119 0 0 4297 0 Volume (vph) 122 0 475 0 0 0 0 115 144 255 876 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 67 67 500 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 1309 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 27 27 20 8 28 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.31 0.45 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 772 772 691 1582 2065 V/C Ratio 0.09 0.09 0.72 0.19 0.63 V/S Ratio Prot 0.04 0.04 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm 0.32 0.06 0.23 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.9 6.9 9.7 10.6 8.3 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.60 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.5 Webster's St Delay 6.9 6.9 12.3 10.6 5.4 LOS B B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 3 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.55 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 2 , 4 7 T B Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w'0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3°% 7'10'1998 Queues a © 0000aoo Lig ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 3670 1583 1770 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.396 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 0 0 0 3670 1583 738 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 527 1172 61 96 129 0 0 229 121 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 1879 64 101 136 0 0 241 127 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 51 51 24 24 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 30 g/c Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2349 1013 207 522 522 443 V/C Ratio 0.80 0.06 0.49 0.26 0.46 0.29 V/S Ratio Prot 0.51 V/S Ratio Perm 0.04 0.14 0.07 0.13 0.08 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.6 3.8 17.1 15.9 17.0 16.1 Platoon Factor 0.66 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 1.5 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 Webster's St Delay 6.4 2.5 18.6 16.0 17.4 16.2 LOS B A C C C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.65 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.71 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 8.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 114 6 ..g Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 6 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues aoaa000 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations tt Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Volume(vph) 0 0 1153 1840 73 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 1214 2034 77 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 46 46 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.65 0.65 0.26 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1153 2427 456 V/C Ratio 1.05 0.84 0.17 V/S Ratio Prot 0.69 0.04 WS Ratio Perm 0.55 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 8.7 6.7 14.4 Platoon Factor 0.49 0.44 1.73 Incr. Delay, d2 35.4 2.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 39.7 4.9 25.1 LOS D A D Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 66 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.73 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.80 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 6 1418 Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7'9!1998 Site w,'0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7-10'1998 Queues oaoFr] a000a © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations #T+ r ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3550 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.953 0.333 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3550 1583 620 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 812 9 414 53 183 0 0 319 6 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 471 480 436 56 212 0 0 370 6 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 26 26 8 20 9 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.42 0.42 0.53 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.33 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 740 1485 835 296 1727 1829 518 V/C Ratio 0.64 0.32 0.52 0.19 0.12 0.20 0.01 V/S Ratio Prot 0.27 0.14 0.06 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.22 0.04 0.04 007 0.00 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 9.6 8.2 5.5 10.3 10.3 10.1 9.5 Platoon Factor 0.55 0.55 0.34 0.68 0.67 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 6.6 4.6 2.4 7.0 7.0 10.1 9.5 LOS B A A B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.38 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.46 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard +1 13 , 4 6 8 .7 Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'10/1998 Queues D 0 0 0 0 © 0 Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 x1900 9900 1900 '1900 9900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5449 0 1770 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.654 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 5449 0 1218 5588 Volume (vph) 25 0 62 125 25 434 125 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 0 65 174 0 457 145 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 40 40 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.62 0.62 0.62 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 502 449 3360 751 3446 V/C Ratio 0.05 0.14 0.05 0.61 0.04 V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.04 0.03 0.38 0.03 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 11.9 12.2 3.5 5.4 3.4 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 10.1 10.4 2.9 5.6 2.9 LOS B B A B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.42 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.46 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.1 Intersection LOS. B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & 4 4D40 Al t�: � xr LTJ 6 T8 Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 9 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 AM Peak Hour 7,'9!1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 30ro 7'10'1998 Queues a © ooa © aa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 0 3647 0 3424 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.562 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 0 1583 0 2094 0 3424 0 Volume (vph) 105 0 36 107 147 0 502 584 Lane Group Flow (vph) 111 0 38 0 282 0 1200 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 21 21 9 36 9 36 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.27 0.36 0.64 0.50 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 483 576 1474 1712 V/C Ratio 0.23 0.07 0.19 0.91dr V/S Ratio Prot 0.06 0.01 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.02 0.10 0.35 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 14.2 9.0 3.7 9.7 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 Webster's St Delay 14.2 9.0 3.7 4.3 LOS B B A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 66 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.43 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.0 Intersection LOS: B dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road 2 E-� 3 , 4 21 Phase 2 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 Map - Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 10, 1998 SH 114 WB Semi ce Road 8 SH 114 SS Service Road Sh 11 o 4 Wg a Sy SerLq-C c 7q F S Road a a e e�ce R cc ti c gad o � 3 � Y Kirkwood Boulevard Y Sy / "Road Runner lSy 77 Iirkwood Bou/evar B� d 0 o:. L U N E m U) Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH & SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 11Dta-51dta5-c1DT&A198122 Road Runner TIAlp2pm-25.sy5 Timing Plan: Default SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'10'1998 Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5566 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 5566 0 0 0 0 0 1863 1583 0 3725 0 Volume (vph) 0 1292 38 0 0 0 0 200 921 0 308 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1540 0 0 0 0 0 211 969 0 340 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 33 33 67 67 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.30 0.64 0.64 0.64 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1670 1192 1013 2384 V/C Ratio 0.92 0.18 0.96 0.14 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.28 0.11 0.61 0.09 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 25.7 5.5 12.7 5.4 Platoon Factor 1.00 0.68 0.72 0.87 Incr. Delay, d2 6.5 0.0 13.7 0.0 Webster's St Delay 32.2 3.8 22.8 4.7 LOS D A C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.89 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.95 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 24.2 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 2 �, 4 33 M ..F� .17171 167. T 8 Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page I DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7'9/1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'10/1998 Queues a © a41-H © oa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1751 0 1770 1611 0 0 3610 0 1770 3588 0 Flt Perm. 0.598 0.754 0.950 0.951 0.148 Satd. Flow(perm) 1114 1751 0 1405 1611 0 0 3433 0 276 3588 0 Volume (vph) 81 48 32 93 17 149 7 1034 275 112 252 83 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 85 0 98 175 0 0 1452 0 118 369 0 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 30 30 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.54 0.54 0.54 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 379 595 478 548 1854 149 1938 V/C Ratio 0.22 0.14 0.21 0.32 0.78 0.79 0.19 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.08 0.05 0.07 0.11 0.42 0.43 0.10 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 9.0 8.7 8.9 9.3 7.0 7.0 4.5 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.69 1.36 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.6 16.3 0.0 Webster's St Delay 9.0 8.7 8.9 9.4 4.5 28.1 6.1 LOS B B B B A D B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.54 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.61 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road z y4 tro E- s T , B Phase 2 PNI Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site"/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'101998 Queues aaaa00000 © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5287 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.998 0.950 0.950 0.367 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5287 0 0 0 0 0 3725 1583 684 3725 0 Volume (vph) 12 240 133 0 0 0 0 479 640 9 191 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 446 0 0 0 0 0 529 674 9 211 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 40 40 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.28 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1498 2297 976 422 2297 V/C Ratio 0.30 0.23 0.69 0.02 0.09 V/S Ratio Prot 0.08 V/S Ratio Perm 0.14 0.43 0.01 0.06 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 12.8 3.9 5.8 3.4 3.5 Platoon Factor 0.80 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.21 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 10.3 3.9 7.3 3.8 4.3 LOS B A B A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.51 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.57 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.7 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 2 �, 4 T $ Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH & SES Page 3 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7,'9/1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'10/1998 Queues © oFri Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 5387 0 0 5538 1770 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.733 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5387 0 0 4096 1770 0 1583 Volume (vph) 915 290 43 198 34 0 63 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1395 0 0 279 36 0 66 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2289 1741 752 673 V/C Ratio 0.61 0.16 0.05 0.10 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.26 0.07 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.8 5.4 5.1 5.2 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 6.1 4.6 4.3 4.5 LOS B A A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 40 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.30 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.35 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road 2 20, �:. . 20 F- 6 a' 8 Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH & SES Page 4 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7 9 1998 Site w 10.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'101998 Queues aa0000aoo © aa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 4890 0 0 5449 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.789 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 4890 0 0 4409 0 Volume (vph) 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 51 249 61 58 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 3 2 7 0 0 0 0 347 0 0 137 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 q Maximum Split (s) 22 22 20 8 28 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.34 0.50 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 673 602 1663 2308 V/C Ratio 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.06 V/S Ratio Prot 0.00 0.00 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.00 0.07 0.02 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.3 7.2 7.3 8.9 4.9 Platoon Factor 0.21 0.32 0.19 1.00 0.74 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 1.5 2.3 1.4 8.9 3.6 LOS A A A B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.08 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.10 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 2 �, 4 B Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7.91998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7101998 Queues o © 0000aoo © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 3688 1583 1770 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.857 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 3688 1583 1596 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 166 685 22 454 12 0 0 34 16 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 941 23 478 13 0 0 36 17 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 27 27 33 33 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1475 633 798 932 932 792 V/C Ratio 0.64 0.04 0.60 0.01 0.04 0.02 V/S Ratio Prot 0.26 V/S Ratio Perm 0.01 0.30 0.01 0.02 0.01 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 11.0 8.3 8.1 5.7 5.8 5.8 Platoon Factor 0.59 0.59 0.72 0.44 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 7.2 4.9 6.8 2.5 5.8 5.8 LOS B A B A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.55 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 4 27 t Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Pace 6 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'1011998 Queues Eg F—fl a Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3725 1770 0 0 Volume (vph) 0 0 308 455 200 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 324 503 211 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 28 28 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.38 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 885 1862 673 V/C Ratio 0.37 0.27 0.31 V/S Ratio Prot 0.18 0.12 V/S Ratio Perm 0.14 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.8 5.5 8.3 Platoon Factor 0.45 0.45 0.51 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.1 Webster's St Delay 2.7 2.5 4.3 LOS A A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.30 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.34 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 2.9 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road { ,. - Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7'9 1998 Site w'0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'10'1998 Queues o © 0000aoo © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ►� 4t F ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3588 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.963 0.754 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3588 1583 1405 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 47 7 24 45 9 0 0 73 5 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 27 35 25 47 10 0 0 85 5 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 22 22 8 20 8 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.48 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 1363 760 514 1900 1900 538 V/C Ratio 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.01 0.04 0.01 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.01 0.02 000 0.02 0.00 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 7.4 4.1 8.6 8.3 8.4 8.4 Platoon Factor 0.46 0.46 0.34 0.19 0.20 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 3.4 3.4 1.4 1.6 1.7 8.4 8.4 LOS A A A A A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.05 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.06 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.7 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 4 *t 3 vl 6 7 g Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w'0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7.'10'1998 Queues H Fq FT] A N F11 Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector (ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5449 0 1770 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.654 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 5449 0 1218 5588 Volume (vph) 25 0 348 125 25 124 125 Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 0 366 174 0 131 145 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 24 24 21 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.47 0.47 0.40 0.40 0.40 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 826 739 2180 487 2235 V/C Ratio 0.03 0.50 0.08 0.27 0.06 V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.23 0.03 0.11 0.03 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 4.9 6.3 6.3 6.9 6.3 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 085 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.2 5.8 5.4 5.9 5.4 LOS A B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.34 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.39 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.6 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & 4 4` - f 6 T 8 Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Pacye 9 DESHAZ-P300 ` "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 2 PM Peak Hour 719,'1998 Site w/0.25 FAR Plus Base Grown at 300' 7/10/1998 Queues aa ® oFT] © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 j1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 0 3714 0 3465 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.854 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 0 3182 0 3465 0 Volume (vph) 719 0 122 45 597 0 184 161 Lane Group Flow (vph) 757 0 128 0 708 0 381 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 59 59 8 33 8 33 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.56 0.61 0.38 0.30 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 991 966 1236 1040 V/C Ratio 0.76 0.13 0.57 0.37 V/S Ratio Prot 0.43 0.01 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.07 0.19 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 12.8 5.4 19.6 20.9 Platoon Factor 0.92 0.90 1.00 0.93 Incr. Delay, d2 2.5 0.0 0.5 0.1 Webster's St Delay 14.3 4.9 20.1 19.4 LOS B A C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 3 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.62 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 16.8 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road 2 E� 359 �, 4 ,Eg . 7 T 8 Phase 2 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 Map -Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 10, 1998 SH 114 We Servi ce Roadad SH 114 Es Service Ro B Sy c 114 lVe a o Siy Sen,,Ce 4 11 R d F@Se,-V. ce m,too c Road o 00 Kirkwood Boulevar� Y SN "Road Runner / I S N>>4 I �rkwood Boulevard 8� 0 0 o: 0 0 U U N E M U) Site w10.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH &SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 11Dta-51dta5-6DT&A198122 Road Runner TWp3am-50.sy5 Timing Plan: Default SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'10'1998 Queues oa000000a © ao Lane Groug EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3725 1583 0 0 0 0 3457 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3725 1583 0 0 0 0 3457 1583 1770 3725 0 Volume (vph) 0 158 511 0 0 0 0 180 333 0 1959 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 174 538 0 0 0 0 401 193 0 2165 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 38 38 62 62 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.59 0.59 0.59 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1304 554 2040 934 2198 V/C Ratio 0.13 0.97 0.20 0.21 0.99 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.05 0.34 0.12 0.12 0.58 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 16.8 24.3 7.2 7.3 15.3 Platoon Factor 0.78 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 11.9 Webster's St Delay 13.2 41.8 7.2 7.3 27.2 LOS B E B B D Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.92 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.98 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 25.3 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 2 �, 4 T 8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page I DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7'91998 Site Nv'0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 39,0 7'10'1998 Queues oaa000000aoEl Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r t r ttt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1863 1583 3539 1863 1583 1770 5588 1583 1770 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.578 0.921 0.069 0.490 Satd. Flow (perm) 2153 1863 1583 3431 1863 1583 129 5588 1583 913 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 16 10 6 361 118 171 47 326 150 293 1585 592 Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 11 6 391 124 180 49 377 158 308 1751 623 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 25 25 85 85 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 431 373 317 686 373 317 96 4166 1180 681 2777 1180 V/C Ratio 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.57 0.33 0.57 0.51 0.09 0.13 0.45 0.63 0.53 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.38 0.07 0.10 0.34 0.47 0.39 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 26.9 26.9 30.2 28.6 30.2 4.4 2.9 3.0 4.1 5.1 4.5 Platoon Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.82 0.57 0.58 1 00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 1.8 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 Webster's St Delay 20.9 20.9 20.9 24.3 22.5 25.3 7.2 1.7 1.7 4.4 5.4 4.8 LOS C C C C C D B A A A B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.58 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 8.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road 2 �, 4 25 25 ..id.` IR5 ,may - �� C i5 F 6 MT 8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour S}nchro Report CLH& SES Page 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site),v'0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 31/,o 710'1998 Queues 0 © 00000FT] 0 © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +Ttt r ttt r tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5443 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.974 0.950 0.950 0.543 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5443 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 1011 3725 0 Volume (vph) 172 152 667 0 0 0 0 256 288 337 954 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 375 702 0 0 0 0 296 303 355 1054 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 28 28 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2722 792 2123 602 384 1416 V/C Ratio 0.14 0.89 0.14 0.50 0.92 0.74 V/S Ratio Prot 0.07 V/S Ratio Perm 0.44 0.05 0.19 0.35 0.28 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.1 8.5 7.7 9.0 11.2 10.2 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.75 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 8.5 0.0 0.6 19.9 1.5 Webster's St Delay 5 1 17.0 7.7 9.6 28.7 9.2 LOS B C B B D B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.79 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 12.6 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 2 ,� 4 U6 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 3 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7'9 1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 710 1998 Queues Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 5471 0 0 5566 3539 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.849 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 5471 0 0 4744 3539 0 1583 Volume (vph) 278 46 126 1375 408 0 54 Lane Group Flow (vph) 375 0 0 1738 442 0 57 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 29 29 21 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.36 0.36 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2845 2467 1274 570 V/C Ratio 0.13 0.70 0.35 0.10 V/S Ratio Prot 0.12 V/S Ratio Perm 0.07 0.37 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 4.7 6.9 8.9 8.1 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 &0 0.7 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 4.0 6.5 7.6 6.8 LOS A B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.49 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road 2 29 29 '> r r.+ F 6 g Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Paae 4 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 79'l 998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 31,o 7 10 1998 Queues oa5121 o © oa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5119 0 0 5527 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.668 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5119 0 0 3733 0 Volume (vph) 201 0 786 0 0 0 0 190 239 422 1459 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 111 827 0 0 0 0 497 0 0 2178 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 48 48 22 30 52 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.19 0.49 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 796 796 712 973 2314 V/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 1.16 1.02dr 0.94 V/S Ratio Prot 0.06 0.06 0.25 V/S Ratio Perm 0.52 0.10 0.21 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 12.3 12.2 20.9 27.6 16.6 Platoon Factor 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 90.7 0.4 6.3 Webster's St Delay 10.6 10.6 108.9 28.0 22.9 LOS B B F D C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.87 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 41.9 Intersection LOS: E dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road S Kirkwood Boulevard % 2 �, 4,,+ TIM_7 k ^2 l 7 .+ Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7'9 1998 Site�,N 0.50 FAR Plus Base Gro«n at 3°.0 7 10 1998 Queues a © aoa0000 © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3576 1583 3539 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.960 0.255 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3576 1583 950 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 904 93 102 156 272 0 0 387 199 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 524 631 107 169 286 0 0 407 209 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 28 28 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 885 1788 792 361 708 708 602 V/C Ratio 0.59 0.35 0.14 0.47 0.40 0.57 0.35 V/S Ratio Prot 0.30 0.18 V/S Ratio Perm 0.07 0.18 0.15 0.22 0.13 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 6.7 5.8 5.1 8.9 8.6 9.3 8.4 Platoon Factor 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.11 1.10 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.9 0.1 Webster's St Delay 64 4.8 4.2 10.6 9.7 10.2 8.6 LOS B A A B B B B Area Type Other Cycle Length: 50 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.51 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.4 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 28 ,. 4 22` t:« Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 6 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7'91998 Site w%0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 30 o 7110 1998 Queues Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3562 3539 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.956 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 0 1770 3562 3539 0 0 Volume (vph) 0 0 1959 96 180 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1134 1245 195 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split (s) 90 90 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.15 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1400 2817 547 V/C Ratio 0.81 0.44 0.36 V/S Ratio Prot 0.64 0.35 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.1 2.8 31.6 Platoon Factor 0.63 0.62 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 2.6 0.1 0.2 Webster's St Delay 5.8 1.8 31.8 LOS B A D Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.70 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Sy nchro Report CLH& SES Page 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 30.0 7,101998 Queues • o © aoorgF1 a Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 r ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3547 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.952 0.240 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3547 1583 447 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1354 1 684 88 303 0 0 527 10 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 784 785 720 93 351 0 0 611 11 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 44 44 10 20 11 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.65 0.32 0.23 0.24 0.24 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 968 1939 1034 267 1267 1341 380 V/C Ratio 0.81 0.40 0.70 0.35 0.28 0.46 0.03 V/S Ratio Prot 0.44 0.22 0.07 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.38 0.08 0.06 0.11 0.01 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 7.5 5.0 11.9 18.2 18.5 16.6 Platoon Factor 0.83 0.83 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 3.7 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 Webster's St Delay 12.4 6.3 5.2 12.2 18.2 18.6 16.6 LOS B B B B C C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.59 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 11.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard c� 3 1 jj, 4 6 �7 T .8 . Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9'1998 Site w'0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7 10 1998 Queues 00000 © a Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r ttt r ttt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 3539 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.508 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 1893 5588 Volume (vph) 50 0 115 300 50 761 300 Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 0 121 348 53 825 348 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm PermPm+Ov Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 21 21 44 44 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.63 0.91 0.63 0.63 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 490 438 3525 1437 1194 3525 V/C Ratio 0.11 0.28 0.10 0.04 0.69 0.10 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.44 0.06 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 13.3 14.0 3.6 0.1 6.0 3.6 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 Webster's St Delay 11.3 12.0 3.0 0.1 6.3 3.0 LOS B B A A B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.51 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & ,� 4 41 ZZ 6 88 . Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 9 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues is LEI © oao © oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 0 1583 1770 3725 0 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.174 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 3539 0 1583 324 3725 0 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 214 0 94 217 309 0 924 1046 Lane Group Flow(vph) 232 0 99 228 341 0 1022 1101 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Free Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 21 21 11 26 8 23 Lost Time(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.33 0.47 0.56 0.42 0.36 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1158 748 393 1558 1355 1583 V/C Ratio 0.20 0.13 0.58 0.22 0.75 0.70 V/S Ratio Prot 0.07 0.02 0.08 V/S Ratio Perm 0.04 0.24 0.09 0.27 0.70 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 10.1 5.0 4.6 7.8 11.7 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 99.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.7 0.9 Webster's St Delay 10.1 5.0 6.1 7.8 13.6 0.9 LOS B B B B B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.42 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner"& Precinct Line Road 2 F, 3 y 4 7 T 8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 Map - Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 10, 1998 • SH 114 Wg d Service Road SH 114 Eg Semi B' ce Road SAY 11 o � q wg S eo sSAY 'v ce � c lq Fe S Roan e'v ce R m 5 oad o 0 Kirkyyood g Y oulevar� r "Roa Sy 71 / d Ruiner I C; Sy lq 'rkkood goule,ard g� m 0 0: 0 0 L U E . Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH & SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 11Dta-51dta5-c1DT&A198122 Road Runner TIA1p3pm-50.sy5 Timing Plan: Default SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 79 1998 Site w'0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7 101998 Queues o © ooa0000 © ao Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3725 1583 0 0 0 0 3394 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3725 1583 0 0 0 0 3394 1583 1770 3725 0 Volume (vph) 0 103 184 0 0 0 0 594 1931 0 664 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 113 194 0 0 0 0 1696 1228 0 734 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Free Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 29 29 61 61 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.64 1.00 0.64 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1076 457 2187 1583 2401 V/C Ratio 0.11 0.42 0.99dr 0.78 0.31 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.03 0.12 0.50 0.78 0.20 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 19.7 8.6 0.0 5.4 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 0.60 99.00 0.69 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.4 1.3 1.8 0.0 Webster's St Delay 17.8 20.1 6.5 1.8 3.8 LOS C C B A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.62 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.5 Intersection LOS: B dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 2 4 177q Te . Phase 3 PM Peak Hour S}nchro Report CLH R SES Pale I DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w'0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 311�0 7'101998 Queues Lane Group � E© � WB�L WB�T WB�R � NBT NBaR S© SB�T SBR Lane Configurations + r t r ttt r tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes - Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 3539 1863 1583 3539 1863 1583 1770 5588 1583 1770 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.859 0.726 0.336 0.182 Satd. Flow (perm) 3200 1863 1583 2705 1863 1583 626 5588 1583 339 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 160 96 64 199 33 280 13 2085 558 169 516 164 Lane Group Flow (vph) 173 101 67 215 35 295 14 2415 587 178 570 173 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Free Perm Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 20 20 25 25 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.49 0.49 1.00 0.49 0.49 0.49 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1209 704 598 1022 704 598 306 2732 1583 166 1821 774 V/C Ratio 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.21 0.05 0.49 0.05 0.88 0.37 1.07 0.31 0.22 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.19 0.02 0.43 0.37 0.53 0.15 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 7.0 7.0 6.9 7.2 6.7 8.1 4.6 7.9 0.0 8.7 5.3 5.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 0.66 1.00 1.29 0.68 0.64 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.8 0.1 80.7 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 7.0 7.0 6.9 7.2 6.7 8.7 2.9 8.0 0.1 91.9 3.6 3.2 LOS B B B B B B A B A F A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 45 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.71 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 9.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road 2 ,� 4 20 LIL-j 6 �' 8 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH&: SES Page 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7'9'1998 Site w'0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 340 7'101998 Queues o © Fil51- oaoo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +Ttt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 x1900 1900 9900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5421 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.970 0.950 0.950 0.115 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5421 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 214 3725 0 Volume (vph) 157 101 239 0 0 0 0 974 1294 115 354 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 299 252 0 0 0 0 1128 1362 121 392 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 22 22 98 98 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 858 251 4424 1253 169 2949 V/C Ratio 0.35 1.01 0.25 1.09 0.71 0.13 V/S Ratio Prot 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm 0.16 0.20 0.86 0.57 0.11 Critical LG? Yes _ Yes Uniform Delay, dl 34.2 38.3 2.5 9.5 4.6 2.2 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.59 0.31 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 45.3 0.0 47.6 8.9 0.0 Webster's St Delay 34.3 83.6 2.5 57.1 16.1 0.7 LOS D F A E C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 1.02 Intersection V/C Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 32.1 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. 2 1 4 N' b Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 3 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues Lan © 5] � a jj Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 5381 0 0 5538 3539 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.682 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5381 0 0 3811 3539 0 1583 Volume (vph) 1565 512 71 338 62 0 103 Lane Group Flow (vph) 2405 0 0 475 67 0 108 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split (s) 48 48 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.27 0.27 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3459 2450 961 430 V/C Ratio 0.70 0.19 0.07 0.25 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.45 0.12 0.07 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.1 3.9 14.4 15.1 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Webster's St Delay 5.7 3.3 12.2 12.9 LOS B A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.52 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.7 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road 2 48 €. - ,}r r` Viz. xX• Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 4 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w10.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues 16 0 © O D 0 0 0 0 0 © O D Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5007 0 0 5409 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.835 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5007 0 0 4666 0 Volume (vph) 59 0 94 0 0 0 0 646 1437 774 380 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 32 99 0 0 0 0 2412 0 0 1337 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 20 20 38 12 50 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.50 0.67 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 430 430 384 2504 3228 V/C Ratio 0.08 0.07 0.26 2.34dr 2.69di V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.02 0.05 V/S Ratio Perm 0.06 0.48 0.22 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 15.5 15.5 16.3 12.8 3.8 Platoon Factor 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.88 0.05 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.1 8.0 0.1 Webster's St Delay 15.3 15.3 16.1 19.4 0.2 LOS C C C C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.60 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 12.7 Intersection LOS: B dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode,with 1 though lane as a left lane. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 2 ,�, 4 20, 7 P I T 18 . Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Pale 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9-1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% T10/1998 Queues r o © 0000aoo © oa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3647 1583 3539 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.952 0.934 0.597 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1773 3480 1583 2224 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 304 180 278 874 257 0 0 165 207 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 189 371 293 948 271 0 0 174 218 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 48 48 72 72 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 665 1305 594 1279 1071 1071 910 V/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.49 0.74 0.25 0.16 0.24 VIS Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.43 0.15 0.09 0.14 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 19.9 19.9 21.9 14.3 9.6 9.1 9.5 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.84 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 20.0 20.0 22.4 13.5 8.2 9.1 9.6 LOS C C C B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.61 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 14.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road &Trophy Club Dr. 2 �, 4 .5+,� -- 3'z 411- z�. - ro F 6 T 8 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Pace 6 DESHAZ-P300 ` "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues 0 © 0 0 0 © 0 0 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 9900 1900 1900 9900 9900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 1583 1770 3725 0 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.261 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 1583 486 3725 0 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 1449 0 267 114 1206 0 396 343 Lane Group Flow (vph) 1571 0 281 120 1332 0 438 361 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Free Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 46 46 10 36 8 34 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.48 0.56 0.37 0.37 0.34 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1691 879 278 1366 1283 1583 V/C Ratio 0.93 0.32 0.43 0.98 0.34 0.23 V/S Ratio Prot 0.44 0.02 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.15 0.13 0.36 0.12 0.23 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 16.8 7.1 14.7 21.3 16.6 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 99.00 Incr. Delay, d2 7.0 0.1 0.7 14.0 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 23.7 7.1 15.4 35.3 15.1 0.0 LOS C B C D C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.80 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 23.1 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road 2 E1 3 �, 4 T 6 147 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 SUPPLEMENT Technical Memorandum To: Dan Jeakins,AIA—HKS,Inc. From: DeShazo,Tang&Associates, Inc. Date: July 14, 1998 Re: Traffic Impact Analysis for the Propose"Road Runner" Site in Westlake,Texas;(DT&A No. 98122) REVISIONS As noted in the original Traffic Impact Analysis submitted by DT&A on July 13, 1998, Table 3. indicated that the intersection of the eastbound Service Road of SH-114 and Kirkwood Boulevard experiences a Level-of-Service E during the 2020 AM peak hour of traffic. Upon further examination, it was determined that by changing the lane operation of the exclusive eastbound right- turn lane to a"free-right"condition, the LOS improves from E to A (no changes to the PM LOS of B result from the modification). Printouts of the results of this analysis are attached. This modification achieves acceptable conditions(LOS D)or better for each peak hour conditions END- Attachments DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 1. Map -Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 13, 1998 SN 114 W,3 Service Road SH 114 EB Service Road B SN 1 p` 1q lye v o S!y Se�Li°e c 114 Fg Road ' r �n'ice mo ° v Road o C U Krkevar d , N 1 Wood Boul � Y ce Road / r I 1 j4 WB Seryi 'Road Runner, Bi SN FB Sem ad Id 8oulevartl Ro B ce ad 9 N O O O L U E Nn Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH &SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 \\Dta-51dta5-c1DT&A198122 Road Runner TIA1p3am-50.sy5 Timing Plan: Default SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues 1❑ © a 41- a N F ® F11 H1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 9900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 3725 1583 0 0 0 0 3457 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 3725 1583 0 0 0 0 3457 1583 1770 3725 0 Volume (vph) 0 158 511 0 0 0 0 180 333 0 1959 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 174 538 0 0 0 0 401 193 0 2165 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 42 42 68 68 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.59 0.59 0.59 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1321 561 2043 935 2201 V/C Ratio 0.13 0.96 0.20 0.21 0.98 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.05 0.34 0.12 0.12 0.58 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 18.2 26.4 7.9 8.0 16.7 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.56 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 20.5 0.0 0.0 11.7 Webster's St Delay 18.3 46.9 4.4 4.5 25.8 LOS C E A A D Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.92 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.97 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 25.1 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 2 ,�, 4 T8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH&SES Page 1 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues 0 ® 51 ❑'` 0 a a 0 0 ® a 0 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r t r ttt r tt r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1863 1583 3539 1863 1583 1770 5588 1583 1770 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.578 0.921 0.069 0.490 Satd. Flow (perm) 2153 1863 1583 3431 1863 1583 129 5588 1583 913 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 16 10 6 361 118 171 47 326 150 293 1585 592 Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 11 6 391 124 180 49 377 158 308 1751 623 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 25 25 85 85 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 431 373 317 686 373 317 96 4166 1180 681 2777 1180 V/C Ratio 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.57 0.33 0.57 0.51 0.09 0.13 0.45 0.63 0.53 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.07 0.11 0.38 0.07 0.10 0.34 0.47 0.39 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 27.0 26.9 26.9 30.2 28.6 30.2 4.4 2.9 3.0 4.1 5.1 4.5 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.79 0.53 0.54 0.39 0.34 0.37 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.2 1.8 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 Webster's St Delay 27.0 26.9 26.9 31.0 28.8 32.0 7.0 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.1 2.0 LOS D D D D D D B A A A A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 - Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.58 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 7.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road 2 �, 4 F 6 T 8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues a ® 000aaM [A ® oo Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ot r ttt r tt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5443 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.974 0.950 0.950 0.543 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5443 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 1011 3725 0 Volume (vph) 172 152 667 0 0 0 0 256 288 337 954 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 375 702 0 0 0 0 296 303 355 1054 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 33 33 27 27 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2722 792 2235 633 404 1490 V/C Ratio 0.14 0.89 0.13 0.48 0.88 0.71 V/S Ratio Prot 0.07 V/S Ratio Perm 0.44 0.05 0.19 0.35 0.28 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.1 10.2 8.7 10.2 12.6 11.4 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.86 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 8.5 0.0 0.5 13.4 1.1 Webster's St Delay 6.1 18.7 8.7 10.6 24.6 10.9 LOS B C B B C B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 - Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.79 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 13.4 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road &Trophy Club Dr. 2 y4 ?7 �t Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH&SES Page 3 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues ® N] 41 H Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations ttT+ +Ttt )Vi r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 5471 0 0 5566 3539 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.842 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 5471 0 0 4705 3539 0 1583 Volume(vph) 278 46 126 1375 408 0 54 Lane Group Flow(vph) 375 0 0 1738 442 0 57 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 53 53 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.25 0.25 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3647 3137 897 401 V/C Ratio 0.10 0.55 0.49 0.14 V/S Ratio Prot 0.12 V/S Ratio Perm 0.07 0.37 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 3.4 5.0 18.1 16.5 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 Webster's St Delay 2.9 4.4 15.8 14.0 LOS A A C B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.49 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.54 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard &Sam School Road 2 8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 4 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues ® 5-41, F4 E N E M 3 ® F11 H1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r +tT +Ttt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5119 0 0 5527 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.698 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5119 0 0 3901 0 Volume (vph) 201 0 786 0 0 0 0 190 239 422 1459 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 112 111 827 0 0 0 0 497 0 0 2178 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Free Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 20 20 37 18 55 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.23 0.23 1.00 0.45 0.69 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 401 401 1583 2321 3030 V/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.52 0.21 0.72 V/S Ratio Prot 0.06 0.06 0.14 V/S Ratio Perm 0.52 0.10 0.35 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 18.2 18.2 0.0 9.4 4.4 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.81 0.58 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.6 Webster's St Delay 18.3 18.3 0.3 7.7 3.2 LOS C C A B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 3 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.42 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.44 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 4.0 Intersection LOS: A Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard 4 5" �P li . x 7 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues ® 0 0 0 ❑T. F] 0 0 ® 41 F1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 r t t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 0 0 0 1770 3576 1583 3539 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.960 0.247 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3576 1583 920 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 904 93 102 156 272 0 0 387 199 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 524 631 107 169 286 0 0 407 209 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 34 34 26 26 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 914 1848 818 353 714 714 607 V/C Ratio 0.57 0.34 0.13 0.48 0.40 0.57 0.34 V/S Ratio Prot 0.30 0.18 V/S Ratio Perm 0.07 0.18 0.15 0.22 0.13 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 7.5 6.5 5.7 10.6 10.2 11.1 10.0 Platoon Factor 0.76 0.76 0.76 1.11 1.10 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.8 0.1 Webster's St Delay 6.4 5.0 4.3 12.6 11.5 11.9 10.1 LOS B A A B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.51 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.57 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 8.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road &Trophy Club Dr. 4 010 1�u 0 „f ,8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 6 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues ® a H1 1fl A Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations +1t Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3562 3539 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.956 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 0 1770 3562 3539 0 0 Volume (vph) 0 0 1959 96 180 0 0 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 1134 1245 195 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 90 90 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.79 0.79 0.15 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1400 2817 547 V/C Ratio 0.81 0.44 0.36 V/S Ratio Prot 0.64 0.35 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.1 2.8 31.6 Platoon Factor 0.65 0.65 0.98 Incr. Delay, d2 2.6 0.1 0.2 Webster's St Delay 5.9 1.9 31.2 LOS B A D Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 110 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.70 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road 6 E•T 8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH&SES Page 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues 0 ® 0 0 0 0 0 T❑ 0 ® 0 Fq Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I +Tt r ttt ttt r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 0 0 0 1770 3547 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.952 0.400 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 0 0 1770 3547 1583 745 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1354 1 684 88 303 0 0 527 10 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 784 785 720 93 351 0 0 611 11 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 44 44 10 20 11 21 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.55 0.55 0.65 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 968 1939 1034 265 1267 1341 380 V/C Ratio 0.81 0.40 0.70 0.35 0.28 0.46 0.03 V/S Ratio Prot 0.44 0.22 0.07 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.38 0.05 0.06 0.11 0.01 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 10.5 7.5 5.7 18.0 18.2 18.5 16.6 Platoon Factor 0.83 0.83 0.38 0.64 0.63 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 3.7 0.1 1.4 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 Webster's St Delay 12.4 6.3 3.6 11.8 11.5 18.6 16.6 LOS B B A B B C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.60 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.68 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 10.1 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard E1 3 �, 4 6 T 8 7 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues 51- 0 FqT❑ 0 ® 0 Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r ttt r ttt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 3539 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.508 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 1893 5588 Volume (vph) 50 0 115 300 50 761 300 Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 0 121 348 53 825 348 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm PermPm+Ov Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split (s) 21 21 44 44 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.63 0.91 0.63 0.63 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 490 438 3525 1437 1194 3525 V/C Ratio 0.11 0.28 0.10 0.04 0.69 0.10 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.08 0.06 0.02 0.44 0.06 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 13.3 14.0 3.6 0.1 6.0 3.6 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 Webster's St Delay 11.3 12.0 3.0 0.1 6.3 3.0 LOS B B A A B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 65 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.51 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.3 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner"& 4 444 E 1 4 6 T 8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 9 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 AM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues fI ® 0 ❑ rfl ® 0 0 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r tt tt rr Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 1583 1770 3725 0 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.174 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 1583 324 3725 0 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 214 0 94 217 309 0 924 1046 Lane Group Flow (vph) 232 0 99 228 341 0 1022 1101 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Free Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 21 21 11 26 8 23 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.33 0.47 0.56 0.42 0.36 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1158 748 393 1558 1355 1583 V/C Ratio 0.20 0.13 0.58 0.22 0.75 0.70 V/S Ratio Prot 0.07 0.02 0.08 V/S Ratio Perm 0.04 0.24 0.09 0.27 0.70 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 10.1 5.0 4.6 7.8 11.7 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 99.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 1.7 0.9 Webster's St Delay 10.1 5.0 6.1 7.8 12.7 0.9 LOS B B B B B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.42 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.51 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 6.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road 2 *, 3 y 4 7 T8 Phase 3 AM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 Map -Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Levels of Service July 13, 1998 SH 114 WB Servic 1 e Road 0 SH 114 ES ServiceB Road Sy 114 a D B a 0 Sy 7 .Sen rce!� U W 14 Fe oad Seryo Ice CO Read o0 � 3 Kirkwood B m oulevarc Y / "Road Runner,, S H>>4 f IWood Boulevard B 0 0 W 0 0 U U) N Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% CLH &SES Data Date: 7/9/1998 \1Dta-51dta5-c\DT&A198122 Road Runner TIA1p3pm-50.sy5 Timing Plan: Default Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r M t r ' ttt r tt rr Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1863 1583 3539 1863 1583 1770 5588 1583 1770 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.720 0.542 0.239 0.100 Satd. Flow(perm) 2682 1863 1583 2019 1863 1583 445 5588 1583 186 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 160 96 64 199 33 280 13 2085 558 169 516 164 Lane Group Flow(vph) 173 101 67 215 35 295 14 2415 587 178 570 173 Perm or Prot? Pm+Pt Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Free Pm+Pt Pm+Ov Phase Number 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 8 23 8 23 8 51 14 57 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.29 0.21 0.26 0.29 0.21 0.32 0.50 0.50 1.00 0.56 0.56 0.61 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 827 388 412 668 388 511 292 2794 1583 286 2095 973 V/C Ratio 0.21 0.26 0.16 0.32 0.09 0.58 0.05 0.86 0.37 0.62 0.27 0.18 V/S Ratio Prot 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.01 V/S Ratio Perm 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.12 0.02 0.43 0.37 0.28 0.15 0.10 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 19.3 24.2 19.1 19.5 23.3 15.4 9.2 16.1 0.0 21.6 8.2 5.2 Platoon Factor 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.73 0.71 1.00 0.51 0.21 0.29 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.0 2.2 0.1 2.9 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 19.0 23.9 18.9 19.3 23.0 16.5 6.7 13.6 0.1 14.0 1.7 1.5 LOS C C C C C C B B A B A A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 96 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 12 - Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.63 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.73 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 11.1 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Precinct Line Road 2 E, 3 �, 4 4=, 57 . ^---- �-r -r_ - 14 J' 5 F 6 T 8 7 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLE& SES Page 2 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues ® D 41- H a [;i�] FT] A Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *Ttt r ttt r tt Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5421 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 1770 3725 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.970 0.950 0.950 0.115 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5421 1583 0 0 0 0 5588 1583 214 3725 0 Volume (vph) 157 101 239 0 0 0 0 974 1294 115 354 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 299 252 0 0 0 0 1128 1362 121 392 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 2 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 20 20 86 86 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 869 254 4376 1240 168 2917 V/C Ratio 0.34 0.99 0.26 1.10 0.72 0.13 V/S Ratio Prot 0.06 V/S Ratio Perm 0.16 0.20 0.86 0.57 0.11 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 30.0 33.8 2.4 8.7 4.4 2.1 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.75 0.31 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 41.4 0.0 53.0 9.4 0.0 Webster's St Delay 30.1 75.1 2.4 61.7 17.0 0.7 LOS D F A F C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 106 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 1.02 Intersection V/C Ratio: 1.08 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 32.9 Intersection LOS: D Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road &Trophy Club Dr. 2 G 4 T $ _ Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLE& SES Page 3 DESHAZ-P300 Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues ® 51 21 H [i;l a 5A Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations +tT +Ttt M r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 5381 0 0 5538 3539 0 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.682 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5381 0 0 3811 3539 0 1583 Volume (vph) 1565 512 71 338 62 0 103 Lane Group Flow (vph) 2405 0 0 475 67 0 108 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Prot Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 48 48 22 22 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.27 0.27 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 3459 2450 961 430 V/C Ratio 0.70 0.19 0.07 0.25 V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.45 0.12 0.07 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 6.1 3.9 14.4 15.1 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 Webster's St Delay 5.7 3.3 12.2 12.9 LOS B A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.52 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 5.7 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: Kirkwood Boulevard & Sam School Road 2 E- 6 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 4 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues 0 ® x 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® O 0 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 x1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5007 0 0 5409 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.835 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 1770 1583 0 0 0 0 5007 0 0 4666 0 Volume (vph) 59 0 94 0 0 0 0 646 1437 774 380 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 33 32 99 0 0 0 0 2412 0 0 1337 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Free Prot Perm Pm+Pt Phase Number 2 2 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 20 20 38 12 50 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.24 0.24 1.00 0.50 0.67 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 430 430 1583 2504 3228 V/C Ratio 0.08 0.07 0.06 2.34dr 2.69dl V/S Ratio Prot 0.02 0.02 0.05 V/S Ratio Perm 0.06 0.48 0.22 Critical LG? Yes Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 15.5 15.5 0.0 12.8 3.8 Platoon Factor 0.98 0.98 1.00 0.88 0.05 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.1 Webster's St Delay 15.3 15.3 0.0 19.4 0.2 LOS C C A C A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 9 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.55 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 12.3 Intersection LOS: B dl Defacto Left Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a left lane. dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. Splits and Phases: SH 114 EB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard z #7r Ts Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 5 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues a ® 041- H 0 0 0 0 ® 0 0 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I +Tt if M t t r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow(prot) 0 0 0 1770 3647 1583 3539 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.952 0.934 0.601 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 0 0 1773 3480 1583 2239 1863 0 0 1863 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 304 180 278 874 257 0 0 165 207 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 189 371 293 948 271 0 0 174 218 Perm or Prot? Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Phase Number 2 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 42 42 64 64 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 652 1280 582 1288 1072 1072 911 V/C Ratio 0.29 0.29 0.50 0.74 0.25 0.16 0.24 V/S Ratio Prot V/S Ratio Perm 0.11 0.11 0.19 0.42 0.15 0.09 0.14 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 18.0 18.0 19.7 12.6 8.5 8.0 8.4 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.84 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.6 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Webster's St Delay 18.1 18.0 20.3 12.0 7.2 8.0 8.4 LOS C C C B B B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 106 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 - Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.61 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.65 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 13.2 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road &Trophy Club Dr. 2 ,�, 4 F 6 �' 8 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLE& SES Page 6 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues © 5-fl Z a a M 3 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations +Tt M Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3610 3539 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.969 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3610 3539 0 0 Volume(vph) 0 0 664 185 594 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 385 599 644 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 66 66 30 30 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.28 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1162 2369 995 V/C Ratio 0.33 0.25 0.65 V/S Ratio Prot 0.22 0.17 0.18 V/S Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 5.5 5.2 23.0 Platoon Factor 0.81 0.81 1.26 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 1.0 Webster's St Delay 4.5 4.2 30.0 LOS A A D Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 96 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.40 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.43 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 14.5 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues oaooaooao ® F110 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I #Tt r ttt ttt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3554 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.954 0.200 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 0 0 1770 3554 1583 373 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 240 5 307 575 113 0 0 933 59 Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 0 0 139 145 323 605 131 0 0 1080 62 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 21 21 29 33 16 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.44 0.66 0.43 0.24 0.24 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 914 701 764 2395 1357 384 V/C Ratio 0.31 0.16 0.46 0.79 0.05 0.80 0.16 V/S Ratio Prot 0.08 0.04 0.09 0.29 V/S Ratio Perm 0.12 0.23 0.02 0.19 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 15.9 15.3 8.9 8.8 8.9 18.9 15.8 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.90 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.4 4.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 Webster's St Delay 16.0 15.3 9.2 8.3 8.0 21.3 15.9 LOS C C B B B C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 - Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.64 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 15.1 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard E1 3 �, 4 `ib rs 6 TMs Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues 41- H Fq D a LE U-1 Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r ttt r ttt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 3539 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.508 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 1893 5588 Volume (vph) 50 0 689 300 50 246 300 Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 0 725 348 53 267 348 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm PermPm+Ov Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 40 40 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.28 0.90 0.28 0.28 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1092 976 1583 1425 536 1583 V/C Ratio 0.05 0.74 0.22 0.04 0.50 0.22 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.46 0.06 0.01 0.14 0.06 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 3.5 6.2 12.5 0.1 13.6 12.5 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 Webster's St Delay 2.9 7.4 10.6 0.1 12.2 10.6 LOS A B B A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 60 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 - Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.60 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 9.0 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" &Trophy Club Dr. 4 6 '� 8 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH&SES Page 9 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/13/1998 Queues © Ffl ❑ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR NBL NBT SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M r tt tt r Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 0 1583 1770 3725 0 3725 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.284 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 0 1583 529 3725 0 3725 1583 Volume (vph) 1449 0 267 114 1206 0 396 343 Lane Group Flow(vph) 1571 0 281 120 1332 0 438 361 Perm or Prot? Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Free Phase Number 2 2 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split(s) 49 49 12 39 8 35 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.48 0.57 0.46 0.38 0.33 1.00 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1696 907 359 1397 1242 1583 V/C Ratio 0.93 0.31 0.33 0.95 0.35 0.23 V/S Ratio Prot 0.44 0.03 0.03 V/S Ratio Perm 0.15 0.12 0.36 0.12 0.23 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 17.8 7.0 11.5 22.2 18.4 0.0 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 99.00 Incr. Delay, d2 6.7 0.1 0.2 10.7 0.1 0.0 Webster's St Delay 24.5 7.1 11.7 32.8 14.8 0.0 LOS C B B D B A Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 96 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.80 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.85 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 22.5 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Precinct Line Road 2 E� 3 �, 4 7 8 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 10 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner"TIA in Westlake July 14, 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The services of DeShazo,Tang&Associates,Inc.were retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a proposed office development. The 311-acre site is located in Westlake, Texas, south of SH-114 west of Precinct Line Road. In accordance with the planned development program, a zoning change to a Planned Development for a 0.5 maximum FAR with permitted office uses is requested. Existing zoning permits office uses with a 0.25 maximum FAR and R-40 residential uses. Amendments to the existing Town of Westlake Thoroughfare Plan are also requested. Future roadway improvements planned in the area include upgrading SH-114 to a freeway(constructing controlled-access travel lanes) between the existing service road network; designating Precinct Line Road to a Farm-to-Market (FM) roadway and improving the cross-section to a multi-lane divided roadway; and, constructing an extension of Trophy Club Drive south of SH-114, to be known as Lake Turner Road. Site development was analyzed under three development scenarios: 600,000 GSF [0.04 FAR] (estimated buildout year 2000), 0.25 FAR (estimated buildout year 2003), and 0.50 FAR (estimated buildout year 2020). Peak hour trip generation values were calculated for the corresponding building programs using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation manual. Based upon the projected regional geographic distribution of households for year 2020 from the North Central Texas Council of Governments, a traffic distribution and assignment analysis was also conducted. Given these data, site- generated traffic was determined and added to the background traffic for the respective scenario. Using the Synchro V3.2 software package the peak hour traffic operational conditions were analyzed. Results of the analysis indicate that with a comprehensive series of intersection improvements, traffic impacts to the operational conditions attributed to the proposed maximum 0.5 FAR zoning can be mitigated to achieve acceptable operational conditions. The zoning change request is supported by the results of this analysis. DeShazo, Tang&Associates, Inc. SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7!9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/1011998 Queues © 0 0 0 0 0 ❑� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 9900 1900 9900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 1770 3610 3539 0 0 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.969 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 1770 3610 3539 0 0 Volume (vph) 0 0 664 185 594 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 385 599 644 0 0 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Prot Phase Number 6 6 8 8 Maximum Split(s) 61 61 29 29 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.64 0.64 0.29 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1141 2326 1022 V/C Ratio 0.34 0.26 0.63 V/S Ratio Prot 0.22 0.17 0.18 V/S Ratio Perm Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 5.5 5.2 21.1 Platoon Factor 0.87 0.87 0.69 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.9 Webster's St Delay 4.9 4.5 15.5 LOS A A C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.40 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.43 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 8.9 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Precinct Line Road - 6 �' 8 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH&SES Page 7 DESHAZ-P300 SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7/10/1998 Queues a © 0000000 © aa Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T? r +++ +++ r Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 1770 3554 1583 1770 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.950 0.954 0.200 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 1770 3554 1583 373 5588 0 0 5588 1583 Volume (vph) 0 0 0 240 5 307 575 113 0 0 933 59 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 139 145 323 605 131 0 0 1080 62 Perm or Prot? Prot Prot Pm+Ov Pm+Pt Pm+Pt Perm Phase Number 6 6 3 8 7 4 Maximum Split (s) 21 21 29 33 16 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.44 0.66 0.43 0.24 0.24 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 455 914 701 764 2395 1357 384 V/C Ratio 0.31 0.16 0.46 0.79 0.05 0.80 0.16 V/S Ratio Prot 0.08 0.04 0.09 0.29 V/S Ratio Perm 0.12 0.23 0.02 0 19 0.04 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, d1 15.9 15.3 8.9 8.8 8.9 18.9 15.8 Platoon Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.90 1.00 1.00 Incr. Delay, d2 0.1 0.0 0.4 4.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 Webster's St Delay 16.0 15.3 9.2 8.3 8.0 21.3 15.9 LOS C C B B B C C Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 70 Control Type: Actuated-Coordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.64 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 15.1 Intersection LOS: C Splits and Phases: SH 114 WB Service Road & Kirkwood Boulevard E1 3 , 4 q' 4 fl 6 7 lij 8 Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 8 DESHAZ-P300 "Road Runner" & Trophy Club Dr. Phase 3 PM Peak Hour 7/9/1998 Site w/0.50 FAR Plus Base Grown at 3% 7'10/1998 Queues 0 0 0 0 0 © 41 Lane Group WBL WBT WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r +tt tr ttt Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 First Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Last Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Right Turn on Reds Yes Yes Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 3539 5588 Flt Perm. 0.950 0.508 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 0 1583 5588 1583 1893 5588 Volume (vph) 50 0 689 300 50 246 300 Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 0 725 348 53 267 348 Perm or Prot? Prot Perm PermPm+Ov Perm Phase Number 6 6 8 4 Maximum Split(s) 35 35 20 20 Lost Time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 g/c Ratio 0.58 0.58 0.31 0.89 0.31 0.31 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1030 921 1727 1410 585 1727 V/C Ratio 0.05 0.79 0.20 0.04 0.46 0.20 V/S Ratio Prot 0.03 0.02 V/S Ratio Perm 0.46 0.06 0.01 0.14 0.06 Critical LG? Yes Yes Uniform Delay, dl 3.8 6.7 10.6 0.1 11.6 10.6 Platoon Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Incr. Delay, d2 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Webster's St Delay 3.2 8.9 9.0 0.1 10.3 9.0 LOS A B B A B B Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 55 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Lost Time: 6 Sum of Critical V/S Ratios: 0.60 Intersection V/C Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Webster Stopped Delay: 8.8 Intersection LOS: B Splits and Phases: "Road Runner" & Trophy Club Dr. 4 6 'r B Phase 3 PM Peak Hour Synchro Report CLH& SES Page 9 DESHAZ-P300